> because
> something had to be used to compile Plan 9 itself, etc and I figure it's
> not being done as a cross-compiler).
> --

ken thompson wrote a nice little C compiler.

cross-compilation is trivial: if 8c is the x86 compiler and qc is the power pc compiler, you get a cross
compiler from x86 to powerpc by compiling qc with 8c. unchanged. that's it.
no nest of peculiar configuration files just to make a given compiler into a cross-compiler.
to cross-compile the whole system for (say) PowerPC on any architecture, including itself, use
objtype=power mk install
on an x86, sparc, amd64, powerpc, ... . you can also build all of them in the same tree:
objtype=power mk install
objtype=386 mk install
objtype=arm mk install
and simultaneously. no peculiar `buildroot' environments. and so on.

the mkfiles are essentially configured for a target platform by /$objtype/mkfile.

here's /386/mkfile:


here's /power/mkfile:

and so on.

there are similarly a few lines of machine-specific includes in /$objtype/include and that's it: all of the system's
includes in /sys/include are completely portable.

wc -l /386/include/*.h
65 /386/include/u.h
25 /386/include/ureg.h
90 total

it's not just system source. if i include /sys/src/cmd/mkone in my own mkfile, and follow the
appropriate pattern, my own C software will build the same way. {mk installall} will build and install it
in my own bin directories, for all supported architectures.

it's complete cross-compilation not completely cross compilation