-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi I am currently running GNUPG version 1.4.9
(gpg (GnuPG) 1.4.9)

What I am looking for are plugins for two program
that I use quite frequently which are Forte Agent 4.2
and Microsoft Outlook 2007 so far I have been unable
to find any plugins to help with encrypt / decrypt / sign
messages.

Both plugins would need to support Windows XP.

Right now I am using a prgram called CryptoPhane 0.7.0
but in order for me to sign messages I have to copy
and past the message into CryptoPhane and then paste
the signed message back out again. Needless to say it
is kind of a pain in the butt a plugin to work in
both of these programs would be great and make it a
lot faster and easier.

If anyone knows of any can they please post them
here. I would greatly appreciate it.

Thank you for your help,

Jamie
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFIWEWInmjumEwVUKERApYmAJ9V63y/DQqFFrYpIqO0w77vpb0j2gCfQIot
CMlrcpe0uLwEul5wFEKJFPs=
=WG0x
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
My Public PGP Key: http://www.darkshado.ca/pgpkey.txt
Key ID: 4C1550A1
The email address in the header is a spamtrap.
email me at darkshad [at] darkshado [dot] ca

Jamie schrieb:
> Hi I am currently running GNUPG version 1.4.9
> (gpg (GnuPG) 1.4.9)
>
> What I am looking for are plugins for two program
> that I use quite frequently which are Forte Agent 4.2
> and Microsoft Outlook 2007 so far I have been unable
> to find any plugins to help with encrypt / decrypt / sign
> messages.
>
> Both plugins would need to support Windows XP.
>
> Right now I am using a prgram called CryptoPhane 0.7.0
> but in order for me to sign messages I have to copy
> and past the message into CryptoPhane and then paste
> the signed message back out again. Needless to say it
> is kind of a pain in the butt a plugin to work in
> both of these programs would be great and make it a
> lot faster and easier.
>
> If anyone knows of any can they please post them
> here. I would greatly appreciate it.
>
> Thank you for your help,
>
> Jamie

I use the Plugin "GPGol" which is in http://www.gpg4win.org/.
There is it not neccesary to make a copy and paste.
The Plug-in places two switches for "encrypt" and for "Sign".

It works also with the Microsoft Exchange server.

I test it with "Microsoft Outlook 2003" and "Office2003 Service Pack 3".
It works fine.

Regards
Andreas
--
yaze-ag 'at' Dipl.-Ing.(FH) Andreas Gerlich, University of Ulm, Germany
z80 'dot' open source project "Yet Another Z80 Emulator by AG":
de --> http://yaze-ag.de/ redirect to
--> http://www.mathematik.uni-ulm.de/users/ag/yaze-ag/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

well what ever plugins are for, but I am using winPT, here even the
portable version which is on my usb stick and it does all the job
automaticaly by the current windo feature like also unde pgp.
It works with both agent and outlook, no idea what one needs anything
else.


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) - WinPT 1.2.0

iQCVAwUBSFqS+/xEhYEy2jP5AQHEmgP/XYz56fTNhZ3YkxkIE6RkRZbr3kEV/XrX
pRWG+pNY9dBhXAnUoql1eT6qgas+DDcE3zABODGegpSpLt5Scz NuF97G0LHcohOI
xbfFvvzARGREgRSMy/fB5XXTP6UFlwQIVSNLSOV+taDStu+UupTO5raGqTrynHbJ
+bjaStmaYLk=
=YSz9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Otto Sykora wrote in
news:8k4l54pr67uul4mf55otqe2jl0fajf23v7@4ax.com:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> well what ever plugins are for, but I am using winPT, here even the
> portable version which is on my usb stick and it does all the job
> automaticaly by the current windo feature like also unde pgp.
> It works with both agent and outlook, no idea what one needs anything
> else.
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) - WinPT 1.2.0
>
> iQCVAwUBSFqS+/xEhYEy2jP5AQHEmgP/XYz56fTNhZ3YkxkIE6RkRZbr3kEV/XrX
> pRWG+pNY9dBhXAnUoql1eT6qgas+DDcE3zABODGegpSpLt5Scz NuF97G0LHcohOI
> xbfFvvzARGREgRSMy/fB5XXTP6UFlwQIVSNLSOV+taDStu+UupTO5raGqTrynHbJ
> +bjaStmaYLk=
> =YSz9
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>

Obviously you are having some kind of problem with WinPT because your
signature does not verify on your post.

-- John

"John Wunderlich" wrote in message
news:Xns9AC27DCEAFE2Fwunderpsdrscray@138.126.254.2 10...
> Otto Sykora wrote in
> news:8k4l54pr67uul4mf55otqe2jl0fajf23v7@4ax.com:
>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

> Obviously you are having some kind of problem with WinPT because your
> signature does not verify on your post.

Hi John,

It does for me.

--
Thor Kottelin
http://www.anta.net/

Antivirus, firewall, parental control: http://www.anta.net/sw/norman/

On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 17:31:13 +0200, Andreas Gerlich
wrote:

>Jamie schrieb:
>> Hi I am currently running GNUPG version 1.4.9
>> (gpg (GnuPG) 1.4.9)
>>
>> What I am looking for are plugins for two program
>> that I use quite frequently which are Forte Agent 4.2
>> and Microsoft Outlook 2007 so far I have been unable
>> to find any plugins to help with encrypt / decrypt / sign
>> messages.
>>
>> Both plugins would need to support Windows XP.
>>
>> Right now I am using a prgram called CryptoPhane 0.7.0
>> but in order for me to sign messages I have to copy
>> and past the message into CryptoPhane and then paste
>> the signed message back out again. Needless to say it
>> is kind of a pain in the butt a plugin to work in
>> both of these programs would be great and make it a
>> lot faster and easier.
>>
>> If anyone knows of any can they please post them
>> here. I would greatly appreciate it.
>>
>> Thank you for your help,
>>
>> Jamie
>
>I use the Plugin "GPGol" which is in http://www.gpg4win.org/.
>There is it not neccesary to make a copy and paste.
>The Plug-in places two switches for "encrypt" and for "Sign".
>
>It works also with the Microsoft Exchange server.
>
>I test it with "Microsoft Outlook 2003" and "Office2003 Service Pack 3".
>It works fine.
>
>Regards
>Andreas


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hmm I saw that one but it says it is for only for 2003

http://www.gpg4win.org/
GPGol: A plugin for Microsoft Outlook 2003 (email encryption)

According to all the information I have seen this doesn't work
with Outlook 2007 yet.

http://www.g10code.com/p-gpgol.html

"This is a plugin for Microsoft Outlook 2003 to integrate GnuPG and
thus OpenPGP encryption and digital signatures. It has been written
more or less from scratch and aims to replace the old and unmaintained
plugin by G-DATA. It does not work with Outlook Express.

We are currently working on extending GpgOL to support S/MIME and
Outlook 2007."

Others have reported this program crashing with Outlook 2007

https://bugs.g10code.com/gnupg/issue830



Any other suggestions?


Thanks,

Jamie
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFIW/LqnmjumEwVUKERAhBNAJ9fae1sSsii2kJPA1Z5aRk+ncipuACb BuBR
ot6bOvQij4BSOfoAq1dxO+k=
=C1yQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 19:22:02 GMT, John Wunderlich
wrote:



>>
>
>Obviously you are having some kind of problem with WinPT because your
>signature does not verify on your post.
>
>-- John

John is right it doesn't verify for me either.

Jamie
--
My Public PGP Key: http://www.darkshado.ca/pgpkey.txt
Key ID: 4C1550A1
The email address in the header is a spamtrap.
email me at darkshad [at] darkshado [dot] ca

no idea, veryfies on my side with winpt and pgp711


Otto Sykora
bggbflxben@tzk.pu (ROT13)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Oh I can see where it does not ver.

On forte where the lines are set shorter then in the original signing
for example.

My pgp settings are in most installations set for line length of 74,
well 76 should be maximum, so it will work most time well.

Text based media like forte agent, have sometimes defoult setting of
70
chars per line.

So in one of my older installation of forte agent. All there was left
defoult and thus it will linewrap to 70 chars. Such content can no be
verfied with anythnig.

Same is for example, if mails are sent via the old compuserve
mailsystem via their old HMI protokol. The mailserver will change the
format and thus add some line braks, such text will never be the same.

Thi is also problem with some mailservers, here in switzelrand,
bluewin
does change mailpackage so even 599 signed messages get bad sig when
arriving.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) - WinPT 1.2.0

iQCVAwUBSF4emfxEhYEy2jP5AQFY7gP/SQlmsSc2H7jx9yw2nUD0tLY8XQRaAXCc
/jZM36IaValp2ITdwt17zTD5q6mjXKrQsKggHXAt5pw8OXwUe/IrZ8sW3J5i7WfH
K8D9VzXTkjMLZIMan/3q7VFh9A8RTyA/oWSiRztUO8H5yHfJzh2OAhj5xIuafCA4
AbY+FOz+qwg=
=dAu2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Otto Sykora
bggbflxben@tzk.pu (ROT13)

Otto Sykora wrote:
> Oh I can see where it does not ver.
>
> On forte where the lines are set shorter then in the original signing
> for example.
>
> My pgp settings are in most installations set for line length of 74,
> well 76 should be maximum, so it will work most time well.
>
> Text based media like forte agent, have sometimes default setting of
> 70
> chars per line.
>
> So in one of my older installation of forte agent. All there was left
> default and thus it will line wrap to 70 chars. Such content can no be
> verified with anything.
>
> Same is for example, if mails are sent via the old Compuserve
> mail system via their old HMI protocol. The mail server will change the
> format and thus add some line breaks, such text will never be the same.
>
> This is also problem with some mail servers, here in Switzerland,
> bluewin
> does change mail package so even 599 signed messages get bad sig when
> arriving.
>

Hello Otto:

I also see a signature verification error. I am imagining that it's
probably what John and Jamie are seeing. I am using GnuPG 2.0.9 and I
agree with your line wrap theory sir. My error message reads in part:


"Error - signature verification failed"

"Indented message part (reply) was probably modified"


Best wishes.

--
1PW

@?6A62?FEH9E=6o2@=]4@> [r4o7t]

bggbflxben@gmx.ch (Otto Sykora) wrote in
news:485e1c8f.141690199@news.bluewin.ch:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> Oh I can see where it does not ver.
>
> On forte where the lines are set shorter then in the original
> signing for example.
>
> My pgp settings are in most installations set for line length of
> 74, well 76 should be maximum, so it will work most time well.
>
> Text based media like forte agent, have sometimes defoult setting
> of 70
> chars per line.
>
> So in one of my older installation of forte agent. All there was
> left defoult and thus it will linewrap to 70 chars. Such content
> can no be verfied with anythnig.
>
> Same is for example, if mails are sent via the old compuserve
> mailsystem via their old HMI protokol. The mailserver will change
> the format and thus add some line braks, such text will never be
> the same.
>
> Thi is also problem with some mailservers, here in switzelrand,
> bluewin
> does change mailpackage so even 599 signed messages get bad sig
> when arriving.
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) - WinPT 1.2.0
>
> iQCVAwUBSF4emfxEhYEy2jP5AQFY7gP/SQlmsSc2H7jx9yw2nUD0tLY8XQRaAXCc
> /jZM36IaValp2ITdwt17zTD5q6mjXKrQsKggHXAt5pw8OXwUe/IrZ8sW3J5i7WfH
> K8D9VzXTkjMLZIMan/3q7VFh9A8RTyA/oWSiRztUO8H5yHfJzh2OAhj5xIuafCA4
> AbY+FOz+qwg=
> =dAu2
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> Otto Sykora
> bggbflxben@tzk.pu (ROT13)

Confirmed!

In your original message, if you un-wrap the last word "else" to appear
at the end of the previous line, then the signature verifies.

In the message that I am replying to, similarly unwrapping the lines
with "70" and "bluewin" on them results in a successful verification.

You probably should reduce your line wrap setting in WinPT when posting
to newsgroups.

Cheers,
John

Jamie wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 17:31:13 +0200, Andreas Gerlich
> wrote:
>
>> Jamie schrieb:
>>> Hi I am currently running GNUPG version 1.4.9
>>> (gpg (GnuPG) 1.4.9)
>>>
>>> What I am looking for are plugins for two program
>>> that I use quite frequently which are Forte Agent 4.2
>>> and Microsoft Outlook 2007 so far I have been unable
>>> to find any plugins to help with encrypt / decrypt / sign
>>> messages.
>>>
>>> Both plugins would need to support Windows XP.
>>>
>>> Right now I am using a prgram called CryptoPhane 0.7.0
>>> but in order for me to sign messages I have to copy
>>> and past the message into CryptoPhane and then paste
>>> the signed message back out again. Needless to say it
>>> is kind of a pain in the butt a plugin to work in
>>> both of these programs would be great and make it a
>>> lot faster and easier.
>>>
>>> If anyone knows of any can they please post them
>>> here. I would greatly appreciate it.
>>>
>>> Thank you for your help,
>>>
>>> Jamie
>> I use the Plugin "GPGol" which is in http://www.gpg4win.org/.
>> There is it not neccesary to make a copy and paste.
>> The Plug-in places two switches for "encrypt" and for "Sign".
>>
>> It works also with the Microsoft Exchange server.
>>
>> I test it with "Microsoft Outlook 2003" and "Office2003 Service Pack 3".
>> It works fine.
>>
>> Regards
>> Andreas
>
>
> Hmm I saw that one but it says it is for only for 2003
>
> http://www.gpg4win.org/
> GPGol: A plugin for Microsoft Outlook 2003 (email encryption)
>
> According to all the information I have seen this doesn't work
> with Outlook 2007 yet.
>
> http://www.g10code.com/p-gpgol.html
>
> "This is a plugin for Microsoft Outlook 2003 to integrate GnuPG and
> thus OpenPGP encryption and digital signatures. It has been written
> more or less from scratch and aims to replace the old and unmaintained
> plugin by G-DATA. It does not work with Outlook Express.
>
> We are currently working on extending GpgOL to support S/MIME and
> Outlook 2007."
>
> Others have reported this program crashing with Outlook 2007
>
> https://bugs.g10code.com/gnupg/issue830
>
>
>
> Any other suggestions?

You might want to look into your current PGP install it's popping errors
here;


Error - signature verification failed

gpg command line and output:
C:\\Program Files\\GNU\\GnuPG\\gpg.exe --charset utf8 --batch --no-tty
--status-fd 2 -d
gpg: Signature made 06/20/08 13:11:54 using DSA key ID 4C1550A1
gpg: BAD signature from "Jamie Baillie "


JustSomeGuy[sm]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 00:41:59 -0500, "JustSomeGuy[sm]" wrote:
>
>You might want to look into your current PGP install it's popping errors
>here;
>
>
>Error - signature verification failed
>
>gpg command line and output:
>C:\\Program Files\\GNU\\GnuPG\\gpg.exe --charset utf8 --batch --no-tty
>--status-fd 2 -d
>gpg: Signature made 06/20/08 13:11:54 using DSA key ID 4C1550A1
>gpg: BAD signature from "Jamie Baillie "
>
>
>JustSomeGuy[sm]

The problem is on your side the signature verifies just fine here.
it is something with your PGP setup if it is not verifying.

Because I can get the signature to verify here just fine.

Jamie
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFIYnz1nmjumEwVUKERAuJ9AKCF40WXVOKn681rX8yQM1 cJJF9vuQCfWmrO
SPZnbDuW4Ux6VbAPaJ87Z14=
=+ej8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
My Public PGP Key: http://www.darkshado.ca/pgpkey.txt
Key ID: 4C1550A1
The email address in the header is a spamtrap.
email me at darkshad [at] darkshado [dot] ca

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 19:18:26 GMT, John Wunderlich wrote:

>
>In your original message, if you un-wrap the last word "else" to appear
>at the end of the previous line, then the signature verifies.
>
>In the message that I am replying to, similarly unwrapping the lines
>with "70" and "bluewin" on them results in a successful verification.
>
>You probably should reduce your line wrap setting in WinPT when posting
>to newsgroups.
>
>Cheers,
> John


In Forte Agent 4.2 you can disable the Word Wrap as well
the option is located in Tools, Options, Compensition Window
then uncheck Word-wrap quoted-printable messages

I also set the Line Length a bit further down to 90

I have no problem my messages are verifying fine.

Jamie
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFIYn4inmjumEwVUKERAkPLAJ97XUhsszqRu69H5fdHrk G/vni33gCfUxvR
b7g9/B21hgkGpDwamuI5O2w=
=3i+G
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
My Public PGP Key: http://www.darkshado.ca/pgpkey.txt
Key ID: 4C1550A1
The email address in the header is a spamtrap.
email me at darkshad [at] darkshado [dot] ca

Note FU.

Jamie wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 00:41:59 -0500, "JustSomeGuy[sm]" wrote:
>> You might want to look into your current PGP install it's popping errors
>> here;
>
>
>> Error - signature verification failed
>
>> gpg command line and output:
>> C:\\Program Files\\GNU\\GnuPG\\gpg.exe --charset utf8 --batch --no-tty
>> --status-fd 2 -d
>> gpg: Signature made 06/20/08 13:11:54 using DSA key ID 4C1550A1
>> gpg: BAD signature from "Jamie Baillie "
>
>
>> JustSomeGuy[sm]
>
> The problem is on your side the signature verifies just fine here.
> it is something with your PGP setup if it is not verifying.
>
> Because I can get the signature to verify here just fine.

Sorry... I appears to have come over the wire garbled in the case I was
quoting. Intermittent, but still appears to be an issue.


JustSomeGuy[sm]

On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 13:14:41 -0400, Jamie
wrote:

>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 00:41:59 -0500, "JustSomeGuy[sm]" wrote:
>>
>>You might want to look into your current PGP install it's popping errors
>>here;
>>
>>
>>Error - signature verification failed
>>
>>gpg command line and output:
>>C:\\Program Files\\GNU\\GnuPG\\gpg.exe --charset utf8 --batch --no-tty
>>--status-fd 2 -d
>>gpg: Signature made 06/20/08 13:11:54 using DSA key ID 4C1550A1
>>gpg: BAD signature from "Jamie Baillie "
>>
>>
>>JustSomeGuy[sm]
>
>The problem is on your side the signature verifies just fine here.
>it is something with your PGP setup if it is not verifying.
>
>Because I can get the signature to verify here just fine.
>
>Jamie
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
>
>iD8DBQFIYnz1nmjumEwVUKERAuJ9AKCF40WXVOKn681rX8yQM1 cJJF9vuQCfWmrO
>SPZnbDuW4Ux6VbAPaJ87Z14=
>=+ej8
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

It has to be your end Jamie. When your sig verifies as good it does so
on all machines I check it on (PGP and GnuPG). The same applies when
it is bad, it's bad on all machines.

--
User

On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 08:54:29 +0800, user@invalid.invalid wrote:

>On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 13:14:41 -0400, Jamie
>wrote:
>
>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>Hash: SHA1
>>
>>On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 00:41:59 -0500, "JustSomeGuy[sm]" wrote:
>>>
>>>You might want to look into your current PGP install it's popping errors
>>>here;
>>>
>>>
>>>Error - signature verification failed
>>>
>>>gpg command line and output:
>>>C:\\Program Files\\GNU\\GnuPG\\gpg.exe --charset utf8 --batch --no-tty
>>>--status-fd 2 -d
>>>gpg: Signature made 06/20/08 13:11:54 using DSA key ID 4C1550A1
>>>gpg: BAD signature from "Jamie Baillie "
>>>
>>>
>>>JustSomeGuy[sm]
>>
>>The problem is on your side the signature verifies just fine here.
>>it is something with your PGP setup if it is not verifying.
>>
>>Because I can get the signature to verify here just fine.
>>
>>Jamie
>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
>>
>>iD8DBQFIYnz1nmjumEwVUKERAuJ9AKCF40WXVOKn681rX8yQM1 cJJF9vuQCfWmrO
>>SPZnbDuW4Ux6VbAPaJ87Z14=
>>=+ej8
>>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>It has to be your end Jamie. When your sig verifies as good it does so
>on all machines I check it on (PGP and GnuPG). The same applies when
>it is bad, it's bad on all machines.


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

no it isn't the messages sign just fine. The problem is on
YOUR END fix your PGP setup.

http://img95.imageshack.us/img95/534...erifiedis7.jpg

Messages that you claim don't sign right sign perfectly here
so the problem is on YOUR END so FIX it and stop spamming
the newsgroups with the same thing over and over again.

Jamie
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFIY4mRnmjumEwVUKERAtSXAJ0VDdQU9R/AFLrmYB55NpDqIAmAJACeNny9
2P2FE6ABCX/xW1SjY4Rx86k=
=c76y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
My Public PGP Key: http://www.darkshado.ca/pgpkey.txt
Key ID: 4C1550A1
The email address in the header is a spamtrap.
email me at darkshad [at] darkshado [dot] ca

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

Jamie wrote:

> no it isn't the messages sign just fine
>

It is true that four of the five messages you signed in
this thread do verify correctly.


$ nntpx -s news.local:120 -c "article <485845bf$1@news.darkshado.ca>" | gpg >nul
gpg: Signature made 06/17/08 18:15:20 using DSA key ID 4C1550A1
gpg: Good signature from "Jamie Baillie "
gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner.
Primary key fingerprint: F62B 95B1 7282 32B6 F807 6014 9E68 EE98 4C15 50A1

$ nntpx -s news.local:120 -c "article <485bf2f5$1@news.darkshado.ca>" | gpg >nul
gpg: Signature made 06/20/08 13:11:54 using DSA key ID 4C1550A1
gpg: BAD signature from "Jamie Baillie "

$ nntpx -s news.local:120 -c "article <48627cf5$1@news.darkshado.ca>" | gpg >nul
gpg: Signature made 06/25/08 12:14:29 using DSA key ID 4C1550A1
gpg: Good signature from "Jamie Baillie "
gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner.
Primary key fingerprint: F62B 95B1 7282 32B6 F807 6014 9E68 EE98 4C15 50A1

$ nntpx -s news.local:120 -c "article <48627e20$1@news.darkshado.ca>" | gpg >nul
gpg: Signature made 06/25/08 12:19:30 using DSA key ID 4C1550A1
gpg: Good signature from "Jamie Baillie "
gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner.
Primary key fingerprint: F62B 95B1 7282 32B6 F807 6014 9E68 EE98 4C15 50A1

$ nntpx -s news.local:120 -c "article <4863899f$1@news.darkshado.ca>" | gpg >nul
gpg: Signature made 06/26/08 07:20:33 using DSA key ID 4C1550A1
gpg: Good signature from "Jamie Baillie "
gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner.
Primary key fingerprint: F62B 95B1 7282 32B6 F807 6014 9E68 EE98 4C15 50A1

$

- --
OpenPGP: id=18795161E22D3905; preference=signencrypt;
url=http://guysalias.fateback.com/pgpkeys.txt
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEVAgUBSGOTDRh5UWHiLTkFAQOmIAf/SCGNnG9/HeHafwuvBHpdWtW3bxNratHr
We6crioo4sguVCwO8f/23uwrnpDy6CwBxmAIFTQWpGtPjJidvK4SCByt3/+1lL1D
waSUK/8lgOiDjZKVyrzTzCOL0Yk8vXwV0sdZpEoWa3qNM3ZGMNjbbDSl ua9TqHC5
grpOvadv+XXs1l1r6IjumgL5beZY4uXqqHIi9W2heEheF4aN8N NKTDeq3lE6K6PD
1mVcwvwlhHf/J6jr+o80g9vvYGKxCwes5ItIgxhuxMiEjKX61wMBSzgOlFjf3W pD
lC1qZxOsvXLf2qoeCFu2ISJGjk1HPytyGjcieU7nT+O1hd7w30 65gg==
=Eg/a
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Yes, the whole thing is I am operating number of installtions,
different versions of OS, forte agent, different settings there and
here, so not all is under controll all the time.

While I often do extensive testing with mainly used mailclients, the
number of news readers I have around me gets forgotten sometimes.