tholen pontificaitoneth first with ambiuity, then with ambgiuity:
>
> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>
>
> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>
>
> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>
--
risto
This is a discussion on Re: Malloy digest, volume 2454316 - OS2 ; tholen pontificaitoneth first with ambiuity, then with ambgiuity: > > >> What does your question have to do with OS/2, Karttunen? > > Nothing, obviously. > > Then why did you post it to an OS/2 newsgroup, Karttunen? > To ...
tholen pontificaitoneth first with ambiuity, then with ambgiuity:
>
> >> What does your question have to do with OS/2, Karttunen?
> > Nothing, obviously.
>
> Then why did you post it to an OS/2 newsgroup, Karttunen?
>
To have some silly fun, remember?
>
> What does your question have to do with OS/2, Karttunen?
>
Nothing, obviously.
--
risto
tholen pontificaitoneth first with ambiuity, then with ambgiuity:
>
> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>
>
> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>
>
> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>
--
risto
Risto Karttunen writes:
> tholen pontificaitoneth first with ambiuity, then with ambgiuity:
Classic ambiguity.
>> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>
Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>
Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>
Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
Risto Karttunen writes:
> tholen pontificaitoneth first with ambiuity, then with ambgiuity:
Classic ambiguity.
>>>> What does your question have to do with OS/2, Karttunen?
>>> Nothing, obviously.
>> Then why did you post it to an OS/2 newsgroup, Karttunen?
> To have some silly fun, remember?
What does your "silly fun" have to do with OS/2, Karttunen?
>> What does your question have to do with OS/2, Karttunen?
> Nothing, obviously.
Then why did you post it to an OS/2 newsgroup, Karttunen?
tholen pontificaitoneth first with ambiuity, then with ambgiuity:
>
> What does your "silly fun" have to do with OS/2, Karttunen?
>
The OS/2 ng is obviously for silly fun nowadays, considering the other
recent postings into it, "DO YOU EAT MEAT?" etc.
--
risto
tholen pontificaitoneth first with ambiuity, then with ambgiuity:
>
> >> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>
> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>
>
> >> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>
> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>
>
> >> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>
> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>
--
risto
Risto Karttunen writes:
> tholen pontificaitoneth first with ambiuity, then with ambgiuity:
Classic ambiguity.
>> What does your "silly fun" have to do with OS/2, Karttunen?
> The OS/2 ng is obviously for silly fun nowadays,
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> considering the other recent postings into it, "DO YOU EAT MEAT?" etc.
What do the actions of your fellow kooks have to do with anything,
Karttunen?
Risto Karttunen writes:
> tholen pontificaitoneth first with ambiuity, then with ambgiuity:
Classic ambiguity.
>>>> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>>>
>> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>
Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>>>> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>>>
>> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>
Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>>>> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>>>
>> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>
Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
tholen pontificaitoneth first with ambiuity, then with ambgiuity:
>
> What do the actions of your fellow kooks have to do with anything,
> Karttunen?
>
I could offer only an opinion about that.
--
risto
tholen pontificaitoneth first with ambiuity, then with ambgiuity:
>
> >>>> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>
> >> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>
> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>
>
> >>>> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>
> >> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>
> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>
>
> >>>> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>
> >> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>
> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>
--
risto
Risto Karttunen writes:
> tholen pontificaitoneth first with ambiuity, then with ambgiuity:
Classic ambiguity.
>> What do the actions of your fellow kooks have to do with anything,
>> Karttunen?
> I could offer only an opinion about that.
So, you admit to being a kook, eh Karttunen?
Risto Karttunen writes:
> tholen pontificaitoneth first with ambiuity, then with ambgiuity:
Classic ambiguity.
>>>>>> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>>>>>
>>>> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>>>
>> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>
Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>>>>>> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>>>>>
>>>> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>>>
>> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>
Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>>>>>> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>>>>>
>>>> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>>>
>> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>
Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
tholen pontificaitoneth first with ambiuity, then with ambgiuity:
>
> So, you admit to being a kook, eh Karttunen?
>
Of course, in a discussion with you.
--
risto
tholen pontificaitoneth first with ambiuity, then with ambgiuity:
>
> >>>>>> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>
> >>>> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>
> >> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>
> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>
>
> >>>>>> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>
> >>>> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>
> >> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>
> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>
>
> >>>>>> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>
> >>>> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>
> >> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>
> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>
--
risto
Risto Karttunen writes:
> tholen pontificaitoneth first with ambiuity, then with ambgiuity:
Classic ambiguity.
>> So, you admit to being a kook, eh Karttunen?
> Of course,
Honesty makes cameo appearance.
> in a discussion with you.
I'm well aware that your admission to being a kook came during a
discussion with me, Karttunen. No need to tell me about it.
Risto Karttunen writes:
> tholen pontificaitoneth first with ambiuity, then with ambgiuity:
Classic ambiguity.
>>>>>>>> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>>>>>
>>>> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>>>
>> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>
Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>>>>>>>> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>>>>>
>>>> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>>>
>> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>
Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>>>>>>>> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>>>>>
>>>> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>>>
>> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>
Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
tholen pontificaitoneth first with ambiuity, then with ambgiuity:
>
> I'm well aware that your admission to being a kook came during a
> discussion with me, Karttunen.
>
Only with you. I never discuss like this with anybody else.
--
risto
tholen pontificaitoneth first with ambiuity, then with ambgiuity:
>
> >>>>>>>> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>
> >>>>>> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>
> >>>> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>
> >> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>
> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>
>
> >>>>>>>> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>
> >>>>>> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>
> >>>> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>
> >> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>
> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>
>
> >>>>>>>> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>
> >>>>>> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>
> >>>> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>
> >> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>
> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>
--
risto
Risto Karttunen writes:
> tholen pontificaitoneth first with ambiuity, then with ambgiuity:
Classic ambiguity.
>> I'm well aware that your admission to being a kook came during a
>> discussion with me, Karttunen.
> Only with you.
I'm well aware that you were only responding to me when you admitted
to being a kook, Karttunen. No need to tell me about it.
> I never discuss like this with anybody else.
Classic inconsistency.
Risto Karttunen writes:
> tholen pontificaitoneth first with ambiuity, then with ambgiuity:
>>>>>>>>>> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>>>>>
>>>> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>>>
>> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>
Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>>>>>>>>>> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>>>>>
>>>> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>>>
>> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>
Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>>>>>>>>>> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>>>>>
>>>> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>>>
>> Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?
>
Cat still got your tongue, Karttunen?