Re: Don't fret, Kanga, there's always the Paralympics! - OS2

This is a discussion on Re: Don't fret, Kanga, there's always the Paralympics! - OS2 ; On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 20:07:27 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote: > On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 18:41:26 +0100, "Peter Hucker" > wrote: > >> On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 09:33:33 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 23 Sep ...

+ Reply to Thread
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4
Results 61 to 71 of 71

Thread: Re: Don't fret, Kanga, there's always the Paralympics!

  1. Re: Don't fret, Kanga, there's always the Paralympics!

    On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 20:07:27 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:

    > On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 18:41:26 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    > wrote:
    >
    >> On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 09:33:33 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>
    >>> On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 19:09:21 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>> wrote:
    >>>
    >>>> On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 06:47:38 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>>> On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 18:57:41 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>
    >>>>>> On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 22:43:28 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>> On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 18:03:00 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 19:59:54 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 18:38:58 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 05:46:33 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:18:38 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:14:32 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:54:54 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 20:15:27 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 18:01:07 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:55:08 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:48:41 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 20:45:55 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:53:56 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:47:40 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unfamiliarity with Tholenisms noted.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So fouling what?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fowl play!
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The chicken consented.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What do you want, the chicken's signature?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic non sequitur, hucker.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> You askjed for substantiation.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic pontification, hucker.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>> And?
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> and what does your post have to do with OS/2, hucker?
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>> Work it out for yourself.
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous conclusion, hucker.
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> It was a request, not a conclusion.
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> Classic erroneous request, hucker.
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> So you admit you were wrong about the conclusion?
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Classic erroneous conclusion, hucker.
    >>>>
    >>>> Conclusions may not have a question mark.
    >>>
    >>> Questionable conclusions may.

    >>
    >> No they may not.

    >
    > I question your conclusion.


    I dispute your unreasoned question.

    --
    http://www.petersparrots.com http://www.insanevideoclips.com http://www.petersphotos.com

    Wife to husband: "What's your excuse for coming home at this time of night?"
    Husband to wife: "Golfing with friends, my dear."
    Wife to husband: "What? At 2A.M.?!"
    Husband to wife: "Yes, We used night clubs."

  2. Re: Don't fret, Kanga, there's always the Paralympics!

    On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 19:02:51 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    wrote:

    >On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 20:07:27 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >
    >> On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 18:41:26 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >> wrote:
    >>
    >>> On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 09:33:33 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>
    >>>> On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 19:09:21 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>> wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>>> On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 06:47:38 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>
    >>>>>> On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 18:57:41 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>> On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 22:43:28 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 18:03:00 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 19:59:54 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 18:38:58 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 05:46:33 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:18:38 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:14:32 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:54:54 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 20:15:27 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 18:01:07 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:55:08 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:48:41 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 20:45:55 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:53:56 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:47:40 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unfamiliarity with Tholenisms noted.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So fouling what?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fowl play!
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The chicken consented.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What do you want, the chicken's signature?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic non sequitur, hucker.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You askjed for substantiation.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic pontification, hucker.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> And?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>> and what does your post have to do with OS/2, hucker?
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> Work it out for yourself.
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous conclusion, hucker.
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> It was a request, not a conclusion.
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> Classic erroneous request, hucker.
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> So you admit you were wrong about the conclusion?
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> Classic erroneous conclusion, hucker.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Conclusions may not have a question mark.
    >>>>
    >>>> Questionable conclusions may.
    >>>
    >>> No they may not.

    >>
    >> I question your conclusion.

    >
    >I dispute your unreasoned question.


    I question the rationale for your dispute.

    Eli


  3. Re: Don't fret, Kanga, there's always the Paralympics!

    On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 23:01:45 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:

    > On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 19:02:51 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    > wrote:
    >
    >> On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 20:07:27 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>
    >>> On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 18:41:26 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>> wrote:
    >>>
    >>>> On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 09:33:33 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>>> On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 19:09:21 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>
    >>>>>> On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 06:47:38 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>> On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 18:57:41 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 22:43:28 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 18:03:00 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 19:59:54 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 18:38:58 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 05:46:33 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:18:38 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:14:32 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:54:54 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 20:15:27 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 18:01:07 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:55:08 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:48:41 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 20:45:55 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:53:56 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:47:40 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unfamiliarity with Tholenisms noted.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So fouling what?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fowl play!
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The chicken consented.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What do you want, the chicken's signature?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic non sequitur, hucker.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You askjed for substantiation.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic pontification, hucker.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> And?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> and what does your post have to do with OS/2, hucker?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>> Work it out for yourself.
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous conclusion, hucker.
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>> It was a request, not a conclusion.
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous request, hucker.
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> So you admit you were wrong about the conclusion?
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> Classic erroneous conclusion, hucker.
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> Conclusions may not have a question mark.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Questionable conclusions may.
    >>>>
    >>>> No they may not.
    >>>
    >>> I question your conclusion.

    >>
    >> I dispute your unreasoned question.

    >
    > I question the rationale for your dispute.


    I scoff at your rationale.

    --
    http://www.petersparrots.com http://www.insanevideoclips.com http://www.petersphotos.com

    If you mated a bulldog and a ****su, would it be called a bull****?

  4. Re: Don't fret, Kanga, there's always the Paralympics!

    On Sat, 27 Sep 2008 19:31:50 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    wrote:

    >On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 23:01:45 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >
    >> On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 19:02:51 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >> wrote:
    >>
    >>> On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 20:07:27 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>
    >>>> On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 18:41:26 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>> wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>>> On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 09:33:33 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>
    >>>>>> On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 19:09:21 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>> On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 06:47:38 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 18:57:41 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 22:43:28 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 18:03:00 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 19:59:54 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 18:38:58 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 05:46:33 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:18:38 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:14:32 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:54:54 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 20:15:27 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 18:01:07 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:55:08 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:48:41 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 20:45:55 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:53:56 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:47:40 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unfamiliarity with Tholenisms noted.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So fouling what?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fowl play!
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The chicken consented.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What do you want, the chicken's signature?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic non sequitur, hucker.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You askjed for substantiation.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic pontification, hucker.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and what does your post have to do with OS/2, hucker?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> Work it out for yourself.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous conclusion, hucker.
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> It was a request, not a conclusion.
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous request, hucker.
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> So you admit you were wrong about the conclusion?
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> Classic erroneous conclusion, hucker.
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> Conclusions may not have a question mark.
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> Questionable conclusions may.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> No they may not.
    >>>>
    >>>> I question your conclusion.
    >>>
    >>> I dispute your unreasoned question.

    >>
    >> I question the rationale for your dispute.

    >
    >I scoff at your rationale.


    I mock your scoffing.

    Eli


  5. Re: Don't fret, Kanga, there's always the Paralympics!

    On Sun, 28 Sep 2008 13:14:26 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:

    > On Sat, 27 Sep 2008 19:31:50 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    > wrote:
    >
    >> On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 23:01:45 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>
    >>> On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 19:02:51 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>> wrote:
    >>>
    >>>> On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 20:07:27 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>>> On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 18:41:26 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>
    >>>>>> On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 09:33:33 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>> On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 19:09:21 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 06:47:38 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 18:57:41 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 22:43:28 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 18:03:00 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 19:59:54 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 18:38:58 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 05:46:33 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:18:38 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:14:32 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:54:54 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 20:15:27 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 18:01:07 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:55:08 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:48:41 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 20:45:55 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:53:56 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:47:40 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unfamiliarity with Tholenisms noted.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So fouling what?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fowl play!
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The chicken consented.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What do you want, the chicken's signature?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic non sequitur, hucker.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You askjed for substantiation.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic pontification, hucker.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and what does your post have to do with OS/2, hucker?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Work it out for yourself.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous conclusion, hucker.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>> It was a request, not a conclusion.
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous request, hucker.
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>> So you admit you were wrong about the conclusion?
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous conclusion, hucker.
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> Conclusions may not have a question mark.
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> Questionable conclusions may.
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> No they may not.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> I question your conclusion.
    >>>>
    >>>> I dispute your unreasoned question.
    >>>
    >>> I question the rationale for your dispute.

    >>
    >> I scoff at your rationale.

    >
    > I mock your scoffing.


    I protesteth your mocking, which is just another word for scoffing anyway.


    --
    http://www.petersparrots.com http://www.insanevideoclips.com http://www.petersphotos.com

    "It is generally inadvisable to eject directly over the area you just bombed." - U.S. Air Force Pilot training manual

  6. Re: Don't fret, Kanga, there's always the Paralympics!

    Peter Hucker wrote:
    > On Sun, 28 Sep 2008 13:14:26 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >
    >> On Sat, 27 Sep 2008 19:31:50 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >> wrote:
    >>
    >>> On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 23:01:45 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>
    >>>> On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 19:02:51 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>> wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>>> On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 20:07:27 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>
    >>>>>> On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 18:41:26 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>> On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 09:33:33 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 19:09:21 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 06:47:38 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 18:57:41 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 22:43:28 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 18:03:00 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 19:59:54 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 18:38:58 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 05:46:33 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:18:38 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:14:32 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:54:54 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 20:15:27 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 18:01:07 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:55:08 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:48:41 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 20:45:55 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:53:56 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:47:40 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unfamiliarity with Tholenisms noted.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So fouling what?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fowl play!
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The chicken consented.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What do you want, the chicken's signature?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic non sequitur, hucker.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You askjed for substantiation.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic pontification, hucker.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and what does your post have to do with OS/2, hucker?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Work it out for yourself.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous conclusion, hucker.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> It was a request, not a conclusion.
    >>>>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous request, hucker.
    >>>>>>>>>>> So you admit you were wrong about the conclusion?
    >>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous conclusion, hucker.
    >>>>>>>>> Conclusions may not have a question mark.
    >>>>>>>> Questionable conclusions may.
    >>>>>>> No they may not.
    >>>>>> I question your conclusion.
    >>>>> I dispute your unreasoned question.
    >>>> I question the rationale for your dispute.
    >>> I scoff at your rationale.

    >> I mock your scoffing.

    >
    > I protesteth your mocking, which is just another word for scoffing anyway.
    >
    >

    Scoffing has been banned in DL and any perpetrators found guilty
    will be admonished.

    Gonad

  7. Re: Don't fret, Kanga, there's always the Paralympics!

    On Mon, 29 Sep 2008 19:39:50 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    wrote:

    >On Sun, 28 Sep 2008 13:14:26 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >
    >> On Sat, 27 Sep 2008 19:31:50 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >> wrote:
    >>
    >>> On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 23:01:45 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>
    >>>> On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 19:02:51 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>> wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>>> On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 20:07:27 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>
    >>>>>> On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 18:41:26 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>> On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 09:33:33 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 19:09:21 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 06:47:38 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 18:57:41 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 22:43:28 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 18:03:00 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 19:59:54 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 18:38:58 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 05:46:33 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:18:38 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:14:32 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:54:54 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 20:15:27 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 18:01:07 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:55:08 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:48:41 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 20:45:55 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:53:56 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:47:40 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unfamiliarity with Tholenisms noted.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So fouling what?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fowl play!
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The chicken consented.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What do you want, the chicken's signature?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic non sequitur, hucker.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You askjed for substantiation.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic pontification, hucker.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and what does your post have to do with OS/2, hucker?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Work it out for yourself.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous conclusion, hucker.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> It was a request, not a conclusion.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous request, hucker.
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> So you admit you were wrong about the conclusion?
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous conclusion, hucker.
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> Conclusions may not have a question mark.
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> Questionable conclusions may.
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> No they may not.
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> I question your conclusion.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> I dispute your unreasoned question.
    >>>>
    >>>> I question the rationale for your dispute.
    >>>
    >>> I scoff at your rationale.

    >>
    >> I mock your scoffing.

    >
    >I protesteth your mocking, which is just another word for scoffing anyway.


    I sneer at your protesting.


  8. Re: Don't fret, Kanga, there's always the Paralympics!

    On Mon, 29 Sep 2008 21:22:47 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:

    > On Mon, 29 Sep 2008 19:39:50 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    > wrote:
    >
    >> On Sun, 28 Sep 2008 13:14:26 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>
    >>> On Sat, 27 Sep 2008 19:31:50 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>> wrote:
    >>>
    >>>> On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 23:01:45 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>>> On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 19:02:51 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>
    >>>>>> On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 20:07:27 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>> On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 18:41:26 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 09:33:33 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 19:09:21 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 06:47:38 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 18:57:41 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 22:43:28 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 18:03:00 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 19:59:54 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 18:38:58 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 05:46:33 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:18:38 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:14:32 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:54:54 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 20:15:27 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 18:01:07 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:55:08 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:48:41 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 20:45:55 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:53:56 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:47:40 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unfamiliarity with Tholenisms noted.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So fouling what?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fowl play!
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The chicken consented.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What do you want, the chicken's signature?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic non sequitur, hucker.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You askjed for substantiation.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic pontification, hucker.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and what does your post have to do with OS/2, hucker?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Work it out for yourself.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous conclusion, hucker.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It was a request, not a conclusion.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous request, hucker.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>> So you admit you were wrong about the conclusion?
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous conclusion, hucker.
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>> Conclusions may not have a question mark.
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> Questionable conclusions may.
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> No they may not.
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> I question your conclusion.
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> I dispute your unreasoned question.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> I question the rationale for your dispute.
    >>>>
    >>>> I scoff at your rationale.
    >>>
    >>> I mock your scoffing.

    >>
    >> I protesteth your mocking, which is just another word for scoffing anyway.

    >
    > I sneer at your protesting.


    Sneer has been used too. You are not very good at this are you?

    --
    http://www.petersparrots.com http://www.insanevideoclips.com http://www.petersphotos.com

    A lady come home and caught her husband in the act of cheating on her.
    The rural housewife went to the back of the house and returned with the family's .22 caliber rifle.
    Aiming the weapon at her husband's balls she said, "I'm gonna turn a bull into a steer, Jon!"
    "No no!" pleaded Jon. "Not like this! C'mon, Judi, give me a sporting chance, darlin'!"
    "All right. I will. You can set 'em to swinging . . . "

  9. Re: Don't fret, Kanga, there's always the Paralympics!

    Peter Hucker wrote:
    > On Mon, 29 Sep 2008 21:22:47 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >
    >> On Mon, 29 Sep 2008 19:39:50 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >> wrote:
    >>
    >>> On Sun, 28 Sep 2008 13:14:26 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>
    >>>> On Sat, 27 Sep 2008 19:31:50 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>> wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>>> On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 23:01:45 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>
    >>>>>> On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 19:02:51 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>> On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 20:07:27 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 18:41:26 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 09:33:33 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 19:09:21 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 06:47:38 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 18:57:41 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 22:43:28 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 18:03:00 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 19:59:54 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 18:38:58 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 05:46:33 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:18:38 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:14:32 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:54:54 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 20:15:27 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 18:01:07 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:55:08 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:48:41 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 20:45:55 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:53:56 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:47:40 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unfamiliarity with Tholenisms noted.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So fouling what?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fowl play!
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The chicken consented.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What do you want, the chicken's signature?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic non sequitur, hucker.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You askjed for substantiation.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic pontification, hucker.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and what does your post have to do with OS/2, hucker?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Work it out for yourself.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous conclusion, hucker.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It was a request, not a conclusion.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous request, hucker.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> So you admit you were wrong about the conclusion?
    >>>>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous conclusion, hucker.
    >>>>>>>>>>> Conclusions may not have a question mark.
    >>>>>>>>>> Questionable conclusions may.
    >>>>>>>>> No they may not.
    >>>>>>>> I question your conclusion.
    >>>>>>> I dispute your unreasoned question.
    >>>>>> I question the rationale for your dispute.
    >>>>> I scoff at your rationale.
    >>>> I mock your scoffing.
    >>> I protesteth your mocking, which is just another word for scoffing anyway.

    >> I sneer at your protesting.

    >
    > Sneer has been used too. You are not very good at this are you?
    >


    I snarl at sneering then.

    Gonad

  10. Re: Don't fret, Kanga, there's always the Paralympics!

    On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 19:10:39 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    wrote:

    >On Mon, 29 Sep 2008 21:22:47 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >
    >> On Mon, 29 Sep 2008 19:39:50 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >> wrote:
    >>
    >>> On Sun, 28 Sep 2008 13:14:26 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>
    >>>> On Sat, 27 Sep 2008 19:31:50 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>> wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>>> On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 23:01:45 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>
    >>>>>> On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 19:02:51 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>> On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 20:07:27 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 18:41:26 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 09:33:33 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 19:09:21 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 06:47:38 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 18:57:41 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 22:43:28 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 18:03:00 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 19:59:54 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 18:38:58 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 05:46:33 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:18:38 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:14:32 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:54:54 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 20:15:27 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 18:01:07 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:55:08 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:48:41 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 20:45:55 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:53:56 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:47:40 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unfamiliarity with Tholenisms noted.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So fouling what?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fowl play!
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The chicken consented.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What do you want, the chicken's signature?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic non sequitur, hucker.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You askjed for substantiation.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic pontification, hucker.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and what does your post have to do with OS/2, hucker?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Work it out for yourself.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous conclusion, hucker.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It was a request, not a conclusion.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous request, hucker.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> So you admit you were wrong about the conclusion?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous conclusion, hucker.
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> Conclusions may not have a question mark.
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>> Questionable conclusions may.
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> No they may not.
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> I question your conclusion.
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> I dispute your unreasoned question.
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> I question the rationale for your dispute.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> I scoff at your rationale.
    >>>>
    >>>> I mock your scoffing.
    >>>
    >>> I protesteth your mocking, which is just another word for scoffing anyway.

    >>
    >> I sneer at your protesting.

    >
    >Sneer has been used too. You are not very good at this are you?


    I ridicule your assertion.


  11. Re: Don't fret, Kanga, there's always the Paralympics!

    On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 20:59:14 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:

    > On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 19:10:39 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    > wrote:
    >
    >> On Mon, 29 Sep 2008 21:22:47 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>
    >>> On Mon, 29 Sep 2008 19:39:50 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>> wrote:
    >>>
    >>>> On Sun, 28 Sep 2008 13:14:26 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>>> On Sat, 27 Sep 2008 19:31:50 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>
    >>>>>> On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 23:01:45 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>> On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 19:02:51 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 20:07:27 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 18:41:26 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 09:33:33 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> Questionable conclusions may.
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>> No they may not.
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> I question your conclusion.
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> I dispute your unreasoned question.
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> I question the rationale for your dispute.
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> I scoff at your rationale.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> I mock your scoffing.
    >>>>
    >>>> I protesteth your mocking, which is just another word for scoffing anyway.
    >>>
    >>> I sneer at your protesting.

    >>
    >> Sneer has been used too. You are not very good at this are you?

    >
    > I ridicule your assertion.


    I squeeze the pimple on your ridicule.

    --
    http://www.petersparrots.com http://www.insanevideoclips.com http://www.petersphotos.com

    /\
    / )
    ( ))
    \|/
    |`-'-'|
    | |
    |..-''|
    | |
    |..-''|
    | |
    |..-''|
    | |
    |..-''|
    _|_____|_
    / . \
    | .-. |
    | |#| |
    |---|#|---|
    )~~|#|~~(
    /---|#|---\
    /~~~~|#|~~~~\
    (-----|#|-----)
    \ (###) /
    `, ,'
    \_____/

+ Reply to Thread
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4