Re: Don't fret, Kanga, there's always the Paralympics! - OS2

This is a discussion on Re: Don't fret, Kanga, there's always the Paralympics! - OS2 ; On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 14:14:32 -0400, Eli Grubman, our dickless table dancer here, wrote: > On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:54:54 +0100, "Peter Hucker" > wrote: > >>On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 20:15:27 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote: >> >>> ...

+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 41 to 60 of 71

Thread: Re: Don't fret, Kanga, there's always the Paralympics!

  1. Re: Don't fret, Kanga, there's always the Paralympics!

    On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 14:14:32 -0400, Eli Grubman, our dickless table dancer
    here, wrote:

    > On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:54:54 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    > wrote:
    >
    >>On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 20:15:27 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>
    >>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 18:01:07 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>> wrote:
    >>>
    >>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:55:08 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:48:41 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>
    >>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 20:45:55 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:53:56 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:47:40 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 18:16:21 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 12:23:02 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 06:44:21 -0400, ah wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>> Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 07 Sep 2008 11:28:49 -0400, ah wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 06 Sep 2008 20:34:17 -0400, ah wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 06 Sep 2008 09:22:42 -0400, ah wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does each personality do something different, a"h?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From all indications.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why then is it referred to as a disorder, a"h?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, for starters, it's not in the original design specs.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Modifications and enhancements never are, a"h,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mmm-hmm.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> Version II is always better than Version I, a"h.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>> Ipso ne facto.
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> Note: foul language.
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>> Note is not foul language.
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> Unfamiliarity with Tholenisms noted.
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> So fouling what?
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> Fowl play!
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> The chicken consented.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as
    >>>>> expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.
    >>>>
    >>>> What do you want, the chicken's signature?
    >>>
    >>> Classic non sequitur, hucker.

    >>
    >>You askjed for substantiation.

    >
    > Classic pontification, hucker.


    Classic display of your well-known retardation and degeneration ...like
    every post of yours.

    F'up to alt.idiots

    --
    Rev. Richard Skull about Eli Grabmen: "Any sex act involving YOU is
    bestiality."

  2. Re: Don't fret, Kanga, there's always the Paralympics!

    On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:54:54 +0100, Peter Hucker, not the brightest bulb
    around, wrote:

    > On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 20:15:27 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >
    >> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 18:01:07 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >> wrote:
    >>
    >>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:55:08 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>
    >>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:48:41 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>> wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 20:45:55 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>
    >>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:53:56 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:47:40 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 18:16:21 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 12:23:02 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 06:44:21 -0400, ah wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 07 Sep 2008 11:28:49 -0400, ah wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 06 Sep 2008 20:34:17 -0400, ah wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 06 Sep 2008 09:22:42 -0400, ah wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does each personality do something different, a"h?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From all indications.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why then is it referred to as a disorder, a"h?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, for starters, it's not in the original design specs.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Modifications and enhancements never are, a"h,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> Mmm-hmm.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>> Version II is always better than Version I, a"h.
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> Ipso ne facto.
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>> Note: foul language.
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> Note is not foul language.
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> Unfamiliarity with Tholenisms noted.
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> So fouling what?
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> Fowl play!
    >>>>>
    >>>>> The chicken consented.
    >>>>
    >>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as
    >>>> expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.
    >>>
    >>> What do you want, the chicken's signature?

    >>
    >> Classic non sequitur, hucker.

    >
    > You askjed for substantiation.


    He actually "askjed" you to show everyone that you are demented enough to
    actually keep "talking" to a subnormal, degenerate swine like him!

  3. Re: Don't fret, Kanga, there's always the Paralympics!

    On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:18:38 +0100, Peter Hucker, not exactly the brightest
    bulb around, wrote:

    > On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:14:32 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >
    >> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:54:54 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >> wrote:
    >>
    >>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 20:15:27 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>
    >>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 18:01:07 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>> wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:55:08 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>
    >>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:48:41 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 20:45:55 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:53:56 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:47:40 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 18:16:21 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 12:23:02 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 06:44:21 -0400, ah wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 07 Sep 2008 11:28:49 -0400, ah wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 06 Sep 2008 20:34:17 -0400, ah wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 06 Sep 2008 09:22:42 -0400, ah wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does each personality do something different, a"h?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From all indications.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why then is it referred to as a disorder, a"h?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, for starters, it's not in the original design specs.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Modifications and enhancements never are, a"h,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mmm-hmm.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Version II is always better than Version I, a"h.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ipso ne facto.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>> Note: foul language.
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> Note is not foul language.
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>> Unfamiliarity with Tholenisms noted.
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> So fouling what?
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> Fowl play!
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> The chicken consented.
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as
    >>>>>> expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> What do you want, the chicken's signature?
    >>>>
    >>>> Classic non sequitur, hucker.
    >>>
    >>> You askjed for substantiation.

    >>
    >> Classic pontification, hucker.

    >
    > And?


    Simple: you are an ass, to say the least!

    F'up to alt.idiots

  4. Re: Don't fret, Kanga, there's always the Paralympics!

    On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:18:38 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    wrote:

    >On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:14:32 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >
    >> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:54:54 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >> wrote:
    >>
    >>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 20:15:27 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>
    >>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 18:01:07 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>> wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:55:08 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>
    >>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:48:41 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 20:45:55 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:53:56 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:47:40 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 18:16:21 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 12:23:02 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 06:44:21 -0400, ah wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 07 Sep 2008 11:28:49 -0400, ah wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 06 Sep 2008 20:34:17 -0400, ah wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 06 Sep 2008 09:22:42 -0400, ah wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does each personality do something different, a"h?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From all indications.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why then is it referred to as a disorder, a"h?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, for starters, it's not in the original design specs.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Modifications and enhancements never are, a"h,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mmm-hmm.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Version II is always better than Version I, a"h.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ipso ne facto.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>> Note: foul language.
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> Note is not foul language.
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>> Unfamiliarity with Tholenisms noted.
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> So fouling what?
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> Fowl play!
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> The chicken consented.
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as
    >>>>>> expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> What do you want, the chicken's signature?
    >>>>
    >>>> Classic non sequitur, hucker.
    >>>
    >>> You askjed for substantiation.

    >>
    >> Classic pontification, hucker.

    >
    >And?


    and what does your post have to do with OS/2, hucker?


  5. Re: Don't fret, Kanga, there's always the Paralympics!


    "Eli Grubman" wrote in message
    news:1k8hc4levq1g9jq7bg27f2phc008he8ra2@4ax.com...
    > On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:18:38 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    > wrote:
    >
    >>On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:14:32 +0100, Eli Grubman
    >> wrote:
    >>
    >>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:54:54 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>> wrote:
    >>>
    >>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 20:15:27 +0100, Eli Grubman
    >>>> wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 18:01:07 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>
    >>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:55:08 +0100, Eli Grubman
    >>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:48:41 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 20:45:55 +0100, Eli Grubman
    >>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:53:56 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:47:40 +0100, Eli Grubman
    >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 18:16:21 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 12:23:02 +0100, Eli Grubman
    >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 06:44:21 -0400, ah
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 07 Sep 2008 11:28:49 -0400, ah
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 06 Sep 2008 20:34:17 -0400, ah
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 06 Sep 2008 09:22:42 -0400, ah
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does each personality do something different, a"h?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From all indications.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why then is it referred to as a disorder, a"h?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, for starters, it's not in the original design
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> specs.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Modifications and enhancements never are, a"h,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mmm-hmm.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Version II is always better than Version I, a"h.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ipso ne facto.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> Note: foul language.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>> Note is not foul language.
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> Unfamiliarity with Tholenisms noted.
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>> So fouling what?
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> Fowl play!
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> The chicken consented.
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective,
    >>>>>>> as
    >>>>>>> expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> What do you want, the chicken's signature?
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Classic non sequitur, hucker.
    >>>>
    >>>> You askjed for substantiation.
    >>>
    >>> Classic pontification, hucker.

    >>
    >>And?

    >
    > and what does your post have to do with OS/2, hucker?


    There was a chap called Hucker,
    A silly little ...........
    >



  6. Re: Don't fret, Kanga, there's always the Paralympics!


    "B.H. Cramer"

    wrote in message
    news:MYmdnVJKL5jtKFXVnZ2dnUVZ_u6dnZ2d@giganews.com ...
    >
    > "Eli Grubman"
    >
    > wrote in message
    > news:1k8hc4levq1g9jq7bg27f2phc008he8ra2@4ax.com...
    >> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008
    >> 19:18:38 +0100, "Peter
    >> Hucker"
    >> wrote:
    >>
    >>>On Wed, 10 Sep 2008
    >>>19:14:32 +0100, Eli Grubman
    >>>
    >>>wrote:
    >>>
    >>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008
    >>>> 18:54:54 +0100, "Peter
    >>>> Hucker"
    >>>> wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008
    >>>>> 20:15:27 +0100, Eli
    >>>>> Grubman
    >>>>>
    >>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>
    >>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008
    >>>>>> 18:01:07 +0100, "Peter
    >>>>>> Hucker"
    >>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008
    >>>>>>> 17:55:08 +0100, Eli
    >>>>>>> Grubman
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008
    >>>>>>>> 17:48:41 +0100,
    >>>>>>>> "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008
    >>>>>>>>> 20:45:55 +0100, Eli
    >>>>>>>>> Grubman
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008
    >>>>>>>>>> 19:53:56 +0100,
    >>>>>>>>>> "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep
    >>>>>>>>>>> 2008 19:47:40
    >>>>>>>>>>> +0100, Eli Grubman
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep
    >>>>>>>>>>>> 2008 18:16:21
    >>>>>>>>>>>> +0100, "Peter
    >>>>>>>>>>>> Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2008 12:23:02
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> +0100, Eli
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> Grubman
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2008
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 06:44:21 -0400,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Eli Grubman
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 07
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sep 2008
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 11:28:49 -0400,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Eli Grubman
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 06
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sep 2008
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 20:34:17 -0400,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Eli
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Grubman
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 06 Sep
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2008
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 09:22:42
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -0400, ah
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Eli
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Grubman
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> each
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> personality
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> different,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a"h?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From all
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> indications.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why then
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is it
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> referred
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to as a
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> disorder,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a"h?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, for
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> starters,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's not
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> original
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> design
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> specs.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Modifications
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enhancements
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> never are,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a"h,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mmm-hmm.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Version II is
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> always better
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than Version
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I, a"h.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ipso ne facto.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Note: foul
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> language.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> Note is not foul
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> language.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>> Unfamiliarity
    >>>>>>>>>>>> with Tholenisms
    >>>>>>>>>>>> noted.
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> So fouling what?
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>> Fowl play!
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> The chicken
    >>>>>>>>> consented.
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> Classic
    >>>>>>>> unsubstantiated and
    >>>>>>>> erroneous claim,
    >>>>>>>> laced with invective,
    >>>>>>>> as
    >>>>>>>> expected from someone
    >>>>>>>> who lacks a logical
    >>>>>>>> argument.
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> What do you want, the
    >>>>>>> chicken's signature?
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> Classic non sequitur,
    >>>>>> hucker.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> You askjed for
    >>>>> substantiation.
    >>>>
    >>>> Classic pontification,
    >>>> hucker.
    >>>
    >>>And?

    >>
    >> and what does your post
    >> have to do with OS/2,
    >> hucker?

    >
    > There was a chap called
    > Hucker,
    > A silly little ...........


    You must be a newbie to d.l
    for Peter has been known as
    Phucker for ages and ages. I
    suggest you read the FAQ'n
    Charter what I have just
    posted elsewhere. It is
    usually best to lurk awhile
    before posting.

    --
    Jane



  7. Re: Don't fret, Kanga, there's always the Paralympics!


    "Wim Jay" wrote in message
    news:Nfqdnd_TMP9ofFXVnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@giganews.com ...
    >
    > "B.H. Cramer" wrote in message
    > news:MYmdnVJKL5jtKFXVnZ2dnUVZ_u6dnZ2d@giganews.com ...
    >>
    >> "Eli Grubman" wrote in message
    >> news:1k8hc4levq1g9jq7bg27f2phc008he8ra2@4ax.com...
    >>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:18:38 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>> wrote:
    >>>
    >>>>On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:14:32 +0100, Eli Grubman
    >>>> wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:54:54 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>
    >>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 20:15:27 +0100, Eli Grubman
    >>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 18:01:07 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:55:08 +0100, Eli Grubman
    >>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:48:41 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 20:45:55 +0100, Eli Grubman
    >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:53:56 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:47:40 +0100, Eli Grubman
    >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 18:16:21 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 12:23:02 +0100, Eli Grubman
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 06:44:21 -0400, ah
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 07 Sep 2008 11:28:49 -0400, ah
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 06 Sep 2008 20:34:17 -0400, ah
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 06 Sep 2008 09:22:42 -0400, ah
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does each personality do something different, a"h?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From all indications.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why then is it referred to as a disorder, a"h?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, for starters, it's not in the original design
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> specs.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Modifications and enhancements never are, a"h,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mmm-hmm.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Version II is always better than Version I, a"h.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ipso ne facto.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Note: foul language.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Note is not foul language.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> Unfamiliarity with Tholenisms noted.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>> So fouling what?
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> Fowl play!
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>> The chicken consented.
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective,
    >>>>>>>>> as
    >>>>>>>>> expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> What do you want, the chicken's signature?
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> Classic non sequitur, hucker.
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> You askjed for substantiation.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Classic pontification, hucker.
    >>>>
    >>>>And?
    >>>
    >>> and what does your post have to do with OS/2, hucker?

    >>
    >> There was a chap called Hucker,
    >> A silly little ...........

    >
    > You must be a newbie to d.l for Peter has been known as Phucker for ages
    > and ages. I suggest you read the FAQ'n Charter what I have just posted
    > elsewhere. It is usually best to lurk awhile before posting.


    He's been crossposting to alt.revisionism is all. I have no interest in
    continuing posting to your group.

    Wankers are a necessary ingredient in all societies. They make the rest of
    us look sane ;-)






  8. Re: Don't fret, Kanga, there's always the Paralympics!


    "B.H. Cramer"

    wrote in message
    news:8PWdnQsjmfXxdFXVnZ2dnUVZ_q7inZ2d@giganews.com ...
    >
    > "Wim Jay"
    >
    > wrote in message
    > news:Nfqdnd_TMP9ofFXVnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@giganews.com ...
    >>
    >> "B.H. Cramer"
    >>
    >> wrote in message
    >> news:MYmdnVJKL5jtKFXVnZ2dnUVZ_u6dnZ2d@giganews.com ...
    >>>
    >>> "Eli Grubman"
    >>>
    >>> wrote in message
    >>> news:1k8hc4levq1g9jq7bg27f2phc008he8ra2@4ax.com...
    >>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008
    >>>> 19:18:38 +0100, "Peter
    >>>> Hucker"
    >>>> wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>>>On Wed, 10 Sep 2008
    >>>>>19:14:32 +0100, Eli
    >>>>>Grubman
    >>>>>
    >>>>>wrote:
    >>>>>
    >>>>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008
    >>>>>> 18:54:54 +0100, "Peter
    >>>>>> Hucker"
    >>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008
    >>>>>>> 20:15:27 +0100, Eli
    >>>>>>> Grubman
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008
    >>>>>>>> 18:01:07 +0100,
    >>>>>>>> "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008
    >>>>>>>>> 17:55:08 +0100, Eli
    >>>>>>>>> Grubman
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008
    >>>>>>>>>> 17:48:41 +0100,
    >>>>>>>>>> "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep
    >>>>>>>>>>> 2008 20:45:55
    >>>>>>>>>>> +0100, Eli Grubman
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep
    >>>>>>>>>>>> 2008 19:53:56
    >>>>>>>>>>>> +0100, "Peter
    >>>>>>>>>>>> Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2008 19:47:40
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> +0100, Eli
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> Grubman
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2008 18:16:21
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> +0100, "Peter
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2008 12:23:02
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +0100, Eli
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Grubman
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sep 2008
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 06:44:21 -0400,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Eli Grubman
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 07
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sep 2008
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 11:28:49 -0400,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Eli
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Grubman
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 06 Sep
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2008
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 20:34:17
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -0400, ah
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Eli
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Grubman
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 06 Sep
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2008
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 09:22:42
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -0400,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Eli
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Grubman
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> each
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> personality
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> different,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a"h?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> indications.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then is
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> referred
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to as a
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> disorder,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a"h?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> starters,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's not
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> original
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> design
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> specs.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Modifications
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enhancements
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> never
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are, a"h,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mmm-hmm.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Version II
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is always
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> better than
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Version I,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a"h.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ipso ne
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> facto.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Note: foul
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> language.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Note is not
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> foul language.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unfamiliarity
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> with Tholenisms
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> noted.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> So fouling what?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>> Fowl play!
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> The chicken
    >>>>>>>>>>> consented.
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>> Classic
    >>>>>>>>>> unsubstantiated and
    >>>>>>>>>> erroneous claim,
    >>>>>>>>>> laced with
    >>>>>>>>>> invective, as
    >>>>>>>>>> expected from
    >>>>>>>>>> someone who lacks a
    >>>>>>>>>> logical argument.
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> What do you want,
    >>>>>>>>> the chicken's
    >>>>>>>>> signature?
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> Classic non sequitur,
    >>>>>>>> hucker.
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> You askjed for
    >>>>>>> substantiation.
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> Classic pontification,
    >>>>>> hucker.
    >>>>>
    >>>>>And?
    >>>>
    >>>> and what does your post
    >>>> have to do with OS/2,
    >>>> hucker?
    >>>
    >>> There was a chap called
    >>> Hucker,
    >>> A silly little ...........

    >>
    >> You must be a newbie to d.l
    >> for Peter has been known as
    >> Phucker for ages and ages.
    >> I suggest you read the
    >> FAQ'n Charter what I have
    >> just posted elsewhere. It
    >> is usually best to lurk
    >> awhile before posting.

    >
    > He's been crossposting to
    > alt.revisionism is all. I
    > have no interest in
    > continuing posting to your
    > group.
    >
    > Wankers are a necessary
    > ingredient in all societies.
    > They make the rest of us
    > look sane ;-)


    Why have you lengthened my
    lines? This has broke my
    Calliopic Muse Mood and I am
    no longer capable of writing
    this day. I shall return.

    --
    Jane



  9. Re: Don't fret, Kanga, there's always the Paralympics!

    Wim Jay wrote:
    > "B.H. Cramer"
    >
    > wrote in message
    > news:8PWdnQsjmfXxdFXVnZ2dnUVZ_q7inZ2d@giganews.com ...
    >> "Wim Jay"
    >>
    >> wrote in message
    >> news:Nfqdnd_TMP9ofFXVnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@giganews.com ...
    >>> "B.H. Cramer"
    >>>
    >>> wrote in message
    >>> news:MYmdnVJKL5jtKFXVnZ2dnUVZ_u6dnZ2d@giganews.com ...
    >>>> "Eli Grubman"
    >>>>
    >>>> wrote in message
    >>>> news:1k8hc4levq1g9jq7bg27f2phc008he8ra2@4ax.com...
    >>>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008
    >>>>> 19:18:38 +0100, "Peter
    >>>>> Hucker"
    >>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>
    >>>>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008
    >>>>>> 19:14:32 +0100, Eli
    >>>>>> Grubman
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008
    >>>>>>> 18:54:54 +0100, "Peter
    >>>>>>> Hucker"
    >>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008
    >>>>>>>> 20:15:27 +0100, Eli
    >>>>>>>> Grubman
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008
    >>>>>>>>> 18:01:07 +0100,
    >>>>>>>>> "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008
    >>>>>>>>>> 17:55:08 +0100, Eli
    >>>>>>>>>> Grubman
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008
    >>>>>>>>>>> 17:48:41 +0100,
    >>>>>>>>>>> "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep
    >>>>>>>>>>>> 2008 20:45:55
    >>>>>>>>>>>> +0100, Eli Grubman
    >>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2008 19:53:56
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> +0100, "Peter
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2008 19:47:40
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> +0100, Eli
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Grubman
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2008 18:16:21
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +0100, "Peter
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2008 12:23:02
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +0100, Eli
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Grubman
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sep 2008
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 06:44:21 -0400,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Eli Grubman
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 07
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sep 2008
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 11:28:49 -0400,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Eli
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Grubman
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 06 Sep
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2008
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 20:34:17
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -0400, ah
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Eli
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Grubman
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 06 Sep
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2008
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 09:22:42
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -0400,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Eli
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Grubman
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> each
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> personality
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> different,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a"h?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> indications.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then is
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> referred
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to as a
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> disorder,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a"h?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> starters,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's not
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> original
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> design
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> specs.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Modifications
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enhancements
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> never
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are, a"h,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mmm-hmm.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Version II
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is always
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> better than
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Version I,
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a"h.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ipso ne
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> facto.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Note: foul
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> language.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Note is not
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> foul language.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unfamiliarity
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with Tholenisms
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> noted.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> So fouling what?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> Fowl play!
    >>>>>>>>>>>> The chicken
    >>>>>>>>>>>> consented.
    >>>>>>>>>>> Classic
    >>>>>>>>>>> unsubstantiated and
    >>>>>>>>>>> erroneous claim,
    >>>>>>>>>>> laced with
    >>>>>>>>>>> invective, as
    >>>>>>>>>>> expected from
    >>>>>>>>>>> someone who lacks a
    >>>>>>>>>>> logical argument.
    >>>>>>>>>> What do you want,
    >>>>>>>>>> the chicken's
    >>>>>>>>>> signature?
    >>>>>>>>> Classic non sequitur,
    >>>>>>>>> hucker.
    >>>>>>>> You askjed for
    >>>>>>>> substantiation.
    >>>>>>> Classic pontification,
    >>>>>>> hucker.
    >>>>>> And?
    >>>>> and what does your post
    >>>>> have to do with OS/2,
    >>>>> hucker?
    >>>> There was a chap called
    >>>> Hucker,
    >>>> A silly little ...........
    >>> You must be a newbie to d.l
    >>> for Peter has been known as
    >>> Phucker for ages and ages.
    >>> I suggest you read the
    >>> FAQ'n Charter what I have
    >>> just posted elsewhere. It
    >>> is usually best to lurk
    >>> awhile before posting.

    >> He's been crossposting to
    >> alt.revisionism is all. I
    >> have no interest in
    >> continuing posting to your
    >> group.
    >>
    >> Wankers are a necessary
    >> ingredient in all societies.
    >> They make the rest of us
    >> look sane ;-)

    >
    > Why have you lengthened my
    > lines? This has broke my
    > Calliopic Muse Mood and I am
    > no longer capable of writing
    > this day. I shall return.
    >


    Unfortunately!

    Gonad

  10. Don't fret, Kanga, there's always the Paralympics!

    Congratulations to this thread for coming in first in demon.local for
    this past week with 335 posts, or 14.9%.


  11. Re: Don't fret, Kanga, there's always the Paralympics!

    On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 05:46:33 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:

    > On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:18:38 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    > wrote:
    >
    >> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:14:32 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>
    >>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:54:54 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>> wrote:
    >>>
    >>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 20:15:27 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 18:01:07 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>
    >>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:55:08 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:48:41 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 20:45:55 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:53:56 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:47:40 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> Unfamiliarity with Tholenisms noted.
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>> So fouling what?
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> Fowl play!
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> The chicken consented.
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as
    >>>>>>> expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> What do you want, the chicken's signature?
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Classic non sequitur, hucker.
    >>>>
    >>>> You askjed for substantiation.
    >>>
    >>> Classic pontification, hucker.

    >>
    >> And?

    >
    > and what does your post have to do with OS/2, hucker?


    Work it out for yourself.


    --
    http://www.petersparrots.com http://www.insanevideoclips.com http://www.petersphotos.com

    Computers can never replace human stupidity.

  12. Re: Don't fret, Kanga, there's always the Paralympics!

    On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 18:38:58 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    wrote:

    >On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 05:46:33 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >
    >> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:18:38 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >> wrote:
    >>
    >>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:14:32 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>
    >>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:54:54 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>> wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 20:15:27 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>
    >>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 18:01:07 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:55:08 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:48:41 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 20:45:55 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:53:56 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:47:40 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>> Unfamiliarity with Tholenisms noted.
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> So fouling what?
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>> Fowl play!
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> The chicken consented.
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as
    >>>>>>>> expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> What do you want, the chicken's signature?
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> Classic non sequitur, hucker.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> You askjed for substantiation.
    >>>>
    >>>> Classic pontification, hucker.
    >>>
    >>> And?

    >>
    >> and what does your post have to do with OS/2, hucker?

    >
    >Work it out for yourself.


    Classic erroneous conclusion, hucker.


  13. Re: Don't fret, Kanga, there's always the Paralympics!

    On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 19:59:54 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:

    > On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 18:38:58 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    > wrote:
    >
    >> On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 05:46:33 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>
    >>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:18:38 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>> wrote:
    >>>
    >>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:14:32 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:54:54 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>
    >>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 20:15:27 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 18:01:07 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:55:08 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:48:41 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 20:45:55 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:53:56 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:47:40 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> Unfamiliarity with Tholenisms noted.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>> So fouling what?
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> Fowl play!
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>> The chicken consented.
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as
    >>>>>>>>> expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> What do you want, the chicken's signature?
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> Classic non sequitur, hucker.
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> You askjed for substantiation.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Classic pontification, hucker.
    >>>>
    >>>> And?
    >>>
    >>> and what does your post have to do with OS/2, hucker?

    >>
    >> Work it out for yourself.

    >
    > Classic erroneous conclusion, hucker.


    It was a request, not a conclusion.

    --
    http://www.petersparrots.com http://www.insanevideoclips.com http://www.petersphotos.com

    Barber: "Your hair is getting gray."
    Customer: "Try cutting a little faster."

  14. Re: Don't fret, Kanga, there's always the Paralympics!

    On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 18:03:00 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    wrote:

    >On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 19:59:54 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >
    >> On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 18:38:58 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >> wrote:
    >>
    >>> On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 05:46:33 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>
    >>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:18:38 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>> wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:14:32 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>
    >>>>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:54:54 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 20:15:27 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 18:01:07 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:55:08 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:48:41 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 20:45:55 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:53:56 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:47:40 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unfamiliarity with Tholenisms noted.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> So fouling what?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>> Fowl play!
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> The chicken consented.
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as
    >>>>>>>>>> expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> What do you want, the chicken's signature?
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> Classic non sequitur, hucker.
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> You askjed for substantiation.
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> Classic pontification, hucker.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> And?
    >>>>
    >>>> and what does your post have to do with OS/2, hucker?
    >>>
    >>> Work it out for yourself.

    >>
    >> Classic erroneous conclusion, hucker.

    >
    >It was a request, not a conclusion.


    Classic erroneous request, hucker.


  15. Re: Don't fret, Kanga, there's always the Paralympics!

    On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 22:43:28 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:

    > On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 18:03:00 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    > wrote:
    >
    >> On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 19:59:54 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>
    >>> On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 18:38:58 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>> wrote:
    >>>
    >>>> On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 05:46:33 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:18:38 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>
    >>>>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:14:32 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:54:54 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 20:15:27 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 18:01:07 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:55:08 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:48:41 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 20:45:55 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:53:56 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:47:40 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unfamiliarity with Tholenisms noted.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> So fouling what?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> Fowl play!
    >>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>> The chicken consented.
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as
    >>>>>>>>>>> expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>> What do you want, the chicken's signature?
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> Classic non sequitur, hucker.
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> You askjed for substantiation.
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> Classic pontification, hucker.
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> And?
    >>>>>
    >>>>> and what does your post have to do with OS/2, hucker?
    >>>>
    >>>> Work it out for yourself.
    >>>
    >>> Classic erroneous conclusion, hucker.

    >>
    >> It was a request, not a conclusion.

    >
    > Classic erroneous request, hucker.


    So you admit you were wrong about the conclusion?


    --
    http://www.petersparrots.com http://www.insanevideoclips.com http://www.petersphotos.com

    There are 10 kinds of people in the world: Those who understand binary, and those who don't.

  16. Re: Don't fret, Kanga, there's always the Paralympics!

    On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 18:57:41 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    wrote:

    >On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 22:43:28 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >
    >> On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 18:03:00 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >> wrote:
    >>
    >>> On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 19:59:54 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>
    >>>> On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 18:38:58 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>> wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>>> On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 05:46:33 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>
    >>>>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:18:38 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:14:32 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:54:54 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 20:15:27 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 18:01:07 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:55:08 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:48:41 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 20:45:55 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:53:56 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:47:40 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unfamiliarity with Tholenisms noted.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So fouling what?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fowl play!
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> The chicken consented.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as
    >>>>>>>>>>>> expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> What do you want, the chicken's signature?
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>> Classic non sequitur, hucker.
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> You askjed for substantiation.
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> Classic pontification, hucker.
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> And?
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> and what does your post have to do with OS/2, hucker?
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Work it out for yourself.
    >>>>
    >>>> Classic erroneous conclusion, hucker.
    >>>
    >>> It was a request, not a conclusion.

    >>
    >> Classic erroneous request, hucker.

    >
    >So you admit you were wrong about the conclusion?


    Classic erroneous conclusion, hucker.

    Eli


  17. Re: Don't fret, Kanga, there's always the Paralympics!

    On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 06:47:38 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:

    > On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 18:57:41 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    > wrote:
    >
    >> On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 22:43:28 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>
    >>> On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 18:03:00 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>> wrote:
    >>>
    >>>> On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 19:59:54 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>>> On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 18:38:58 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>
    >>>>>> On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 05:46:33 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:18:38 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:14:32 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:54:54 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 20:15:27 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 18:01:07 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:55:08 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:48:41 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 20:45:55 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:53:56 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:47:40 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unfamiliarity with Tholenisms noted.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So fouling what?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fowl play!
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The chicken consented.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>> What do you want, the chicken's signature?
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> Classic non sequitur, hucker.
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>> You askjed for substantiation.
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> Classic pontification, hucker.
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> And?
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> and what does your post have to do with OS/2, hucker?
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> Work it out for yourself.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Classic erroneous conclusion, hucker.
    >>>>
    >>>> It was a request, not a conclusion.
    >>>
    >>> Classic erroneous request, hucker.

    >>
    >> So you admit you were wrong about the conclusion?

    >
    > Classic erroneous conclusion, hucker.


    Conclusions may not have a question mark.


    --
    http://www.petersparrots.com http://www.insanevideoclips.com http://www.petersphotos.com

    "Th on my k yboard has stopp d working"

  18. Re: Don't fret, Kanga, there's always the Paralympics!

    On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 19:09:21 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    wrote:

    >On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 06:47:38 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >
    >> On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 18:57:41 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >> wrote:
    >>
    >>> On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 22:43:28 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>
    >>>> On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 18:03:00 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>> wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>>> On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 19:59:54 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>
    >>>>>> On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 18:38:58 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>> On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 05:46:33 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:18:38 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:14:32 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:54:54 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 20:15:27 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 18:01:07 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:55:08 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:48:41 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 20:45:55 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:53:56 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:47:40 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unfamiliarity with Tholenisms noted.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So fouling what?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fowl play!
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The chicken consented.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> What do you want, the chicken's signature?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>> Classic non sequitur, hucker.
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> You askjed for substantiation.
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>> Classic pontification, hucker.
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> And?
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> and what does your post have to do with OS/2, hucker?
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> Work it out for yourself.
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> Classic erroneous conclusion, hucker.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> It was a request, not a conclusion.
    >>>>
    >>>> Classic erroneous request, hucker.
    >>>
    >>> So you admit you were wrong about the conclusion?

    >>
    >> Classic erroneous conclusion, hucker.

    >
    >Conclusions may not have a question mark.


    Questionable conclusions may.

    Eli


  19. Re: Don't fret, Kanga, there's always the Paralympics!

    On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 09:33:33 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:

    > On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 19:09:21 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    > wrote:
    >
    >> On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 06:47:38 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>
    >>> On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 18:57:41 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>> wrote:
    >>>
    >>>> On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 22:43:28 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>>> On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 18:03:00 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>
    >>>>>> On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 19:59:54 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>> On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 18:38:58 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 05:46:33 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:18:38 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:14:32 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:54:54 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 20:15:27 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 18:01:07 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:55:08 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:48:41 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 20:45:55 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:53:56 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:47:40 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unfamiliarity with Tholenisms noted.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So fouling what?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fowl play!
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The chicken consented.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> What do you want, the chicken's signature?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic non sequitur, hucker.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>> You askjed for substantiation.
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> Classic pontification, hucker.
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>> And?
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> and what does your post have to do with OS/2, hucker?
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> Work it out for yourself.
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> Classic erroneous conclusion, hucker.
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> It was a request, not a conclusion.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Classic erroneous request, hucker.
    >>>>
    >>>> So you admit you were wrong about the conclusion?
    >>>
    >>> Classic erroneous conclusion, hucker.

    >>
    >> Conclusions may not have a question mark.

    >
    > Questionable conclusions may.


    No they may not.


    --
    http://www.petersparrots.com http://www.insanevideoclips.com http://www.petersphotos.com

    Mistress: Something between a mister and a mattress.

  20. Re: Don't fret, Kanga, there's always the Paralympics!

    On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 18:41:26 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    wrote:

    >On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 09:33:33 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >
    >> On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 19:09:21 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >> wrote:
    >>
    >>> On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 06:47:38 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>
    >>>> On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 18:57:41 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>> wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>>> On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 22:43:28 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>
    >>>>>> On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 18:03:00 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>> On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 19:59:54 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 18:38:58 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 05:46:33 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:18:38 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:14:32 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:54:54 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 20:15:27 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 18:01:07 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:55:08 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:48:41 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 20:45:55 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:53:56 +0100, "Peter Hucker"
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:47:40 +0100, Eli Grubman wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unfamiliarity with Tholenisms noted.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So fouling what?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fowl play!
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The chicken consented.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What do you want, the chicken's signature?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic non sequitur, hucker.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>>> You askjed for substantiation.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>>> Classic pontification, hucker.
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> And?
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>> and what does your post have to do with OS/2, hucker?
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> Work it out for yourself.
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> Classic erroneous conclusion, hucker.
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> It was a request, not a conclusion.
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> Classic erroneous request, hucker.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> So you admit you were wrong about the conclusion?
    >>>>
    >>>> Classic erroneous conclusion, hucker.
    >>>
    >>> Conclusions may not have a question mark.

    >>
    >> Questionable conclusions may.

    >
    >No they may not.


    I question your conclusion.


+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast