Re: digest, volume 2454712 - OS2

This is a discussion on Re: digest, volume 2454712 - OS2 ; -- Art Deco writes: 15503> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy 15503> Message-ID: 15503> X-No-Archive: Yes Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky, inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco? 15503> Excellent, Tholen. 15504> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy 15504> Message-ID: 15504> X-No-Archive: Yes Still ...

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 7 1 2 3 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 124

Thread: Re: digest, volume 2454712

  1. Re: digest, volume 2454712

    --
    Art Deco writes:

    15503> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
    15503> Message-ID: <010920081813180878%erfc-1024@usa.net>
    15503> X-No-Archive: Yes

    Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?

    15503> Excellent, Tholen.

    15504> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
    15504> Message-ID: <010920081811515615%erfc-1024@usa.net>
    15504> X-No-Archive: Yes

    Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?

    15504> Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical
    15504> argument.

    15505> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
    15505> Message-ID: <010920081811324462%erfc-1024@usa.net>
    15505> X-No-Archive: Yes

    Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?

    15505> Illogical.

    15506> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
    15506> Message-ID: <010920081811213851%erfc-1024@usa.net>
    15506> X-No-Archive: Yes

    Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?

    15506> Classic inappropriate analogy.

    15507> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
    15507> Message-ID: <010920081811123293%erfc-1024@usa.net>
    15507> X-No-Archive: Yes

    Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?

    15507> Classic inappropriate analogy.

    15508> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
    15508> Message-ID: <010920081811032773%erfc-1024@usa.net>
    15508> X-No-Archive: Yes

    Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?

    15508> You're erroneously presupposing that you are correct.

    15509> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
    15509> Message-ID: <010920081810542221%erfc-1024@usa.net>
    15509> X-No-Archive: Yes

    Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?

    15509> Classic pontification.

    15510> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
    15510> Message-ID: <010920081810441596%erfc-1024@usa.net>
    15510> X-No-Archive: Yes

    Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?

    15510> Classic evasion of the point.

    15511> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
    15511> Message-ID: <010920081810341017%erfc-1024@usa.net>
    15511> X-No-Archive: Yes

    Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?

    15511> You're erroneously presupposing that you are correct.

    15512> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
    15512> Message-ID: <010920081810240406%erfc-1024@usa.net>
    15512> X-No-Archive: Yes

    Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?

    15512> Classic inappropriate analogy.

    15513> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
    15513> Message-ID: <010920081810049181%erfc-1024@usa.net>
    15513> X-No-Archive: Yes

    Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?

    15513> Classic evasion of the point.

    15514> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
    15514> Message-ID: <010920081809538525%erfc-1024@usa.net>
    15514> X-No-Archive: Yes

    Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?

    15514> How ironic.

    15515> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
    15515> Message-ID: <010920081809417852%erfc-1024@usa.net>
    15515> X-No-Archive: Yes

    Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?

    15515> You're erroneously presupposing that you are correct.

    15516> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
    15516> Message-ID: <010920081809297130%erfc-1024@usa.net>
    15516> X-No-Archive: Yes

    Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?

    15516> Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical
    15516> argument.

    15517> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
    15517> Message-ID: <010920081809206541%erfc-1024@usa.net>
    15517> X-No-Archive: Yes

    Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?

    15517> You're erroneously presupposing that you are correct.

    15518> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
    15518> Message-ID: <010920081809095889%erfc-1024@usa.net>
    15518> X-No-Archive: Yes

    Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?

    15518> Ambiguous.

    15519> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
    15519> Message-ID: <010920081808585248%erfc-1024@usa.net>
    15519> X-No-Archive: Yes

    Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?

    15519> Classic pontification.

    15520> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
    15520> Message-ID: <010920081808484636%erfc-1024@usa.net>
    15520> X-No-Archive: Yes

    Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?

    15520> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with
    invective, as
    15520> expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.

    15521> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
    15521> Message-ID: <010920081808353888%erfc-1024@usa.net>
    15521> X-No-Archive: Yes

    Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?

    15521> You're erroneously presupposing that it's a fact.

    15522> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
    15522> Message-ID: <010920081808263334%erfc-1024@usa.net>
    15522> X-No-Archive: Yes

    Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?

    15522> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with
    invective, as
    15522> expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.

    15523> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
    15523> Message-ID: <010920081808162705%erfc-1024@usa.net>
    15523> X-No-Archive: Yes

    Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?

    15523> How ironic.

    15524> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
    15524> Message-ID: <010920081808062103%erfc-1024@usa.net>
    15524> X-No-Archive: Yes

    Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?

    15524> Classic inappropriate analogy.

    15525> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
    15525> Message-ID: <010920081807541400%erfc-1024@usa.net>
    15525> X-No-Archive: Yes

    Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?

    15525> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

    15526> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
    15526> Message-ID: <010920081807430740%erfc-1024@usa.net>
    15526> X-No-Archive: Yes

    Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?

    15526> Classic lack of specificity.

    15527> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
    15527> Message-ID: <010920081807340195%erfc-1024@usa.net>
    15527> X-No-Archive: Yes

    Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?

    15527> You're erroneously presupposing that it's a fact.

    15528> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
    15528> Message-ID: <010920081807239533%erfc-1024@usa.net>
    15528> X-No-Archive: Yes

    Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?

    15528> Classic failure to comprehend the point.

    15529> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
    15529> Message-ID: <010920081807118852%erfc-1024@usa.net>
    15529> X-No-Archive: Yes

    Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?

    15529> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

    15530> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
    15530> Message-ID: <010920081807018249%erfc-1024@usa.net>
    15530> X-No-Archive: Yes

    Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?

    15530> Liar.

    15531> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
    15531> Message-ID: <010920081806487420%erfc-1024@usa.net>
    15531> X-No-Archive: Yes

    Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?

    15531> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with
    invective, as
    15531> expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.

    15532> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
    15532> Message-ID: <010920081806366718%erfc-1024@usa.net>
    15532> X-No-Archive: Yes

    Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?

    15532> Classic erroneous presupposition.

    15533> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
    15533> Message-ID: <010920081806245983%erfc-1024@usa.net>
    15533> X-No-Archive: Yes

    Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?

    15533> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

    15534> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
    15534> Message-ID: <010920081806125259%erfc-1024@usa.net>
    15534> X-No-Archive: Yes

    Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?

    15534> Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical
    15534> argument.

    15535> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
    15535> Message-ID: <010920081806034723%erfc-1024@usa.net>
    15535> X-No-Archive: Yes

    Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?

    15535> Classic lack of specificity.

    15536> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
    15536> Message-ID: <010920081804027478%erfc-1024@usa.net>
    15536> X-No-Archive: Yes

    Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?

    15536> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with
    invective, as
    15536> expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.

    15537> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
    15537> Message-ID: <010920081803526865%erfc-1024@usa.net>
    15537> X-No-Archive: Yes

    Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?

    15537> Classic pontification.

    15538> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
    15538> Message-ID: <010920081803416215%erfc-1024@usa.net>
    15538> X-No-Archive: Yes

    Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?

    15538> Liar.

    15539> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
    15539> Message-ID: <010920081803295534%erfc-1024@usa.net>
    15539> X-No-Archive: Yes

    Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?

    15539> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

    15540> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
    15540> Message-ID: <010920081803164752%erfc-1024@usa.net>
    15540> X-No-Archive: Yes

    Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?

    15540> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with
    invective, as
    15540> expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.

    15541> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
    15541> Message-ID: <010920081803054045%erfc-1024@usa.net>
    15541> X-No-Archive: Yes

    Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?

    15541> Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical
    15541> argument.

    15542> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
    15542> Message-ID: <010920081802523288%erfc-1024@usa.net>
    15542> X-No-Archive: Yes

    Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?

    15542> Classic pontification.

    15543> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
    15543> Message-ID: <010920081802382473%erfc-1024@usa.net>
    15543> X-No-Archive: Yes

    Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?

    15543> How ironic.

    15544> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
    15544> Message-ID: <010920081802261701%erfc-1024@usa.net>
    15544> X-No-Archive: Yes

    Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?

    15544> Classic pontification.

    15545> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
    15545> Message-ID: <010920081802151041%erfc-1024@usa.net>
    15545> X-No-Archive: Yes

    Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?

    15545> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

    15546> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
    15546> Message-ID: <010920081801569911%erfc-1024@usa.net>
    15546> X-No-Archive: Yes

    Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?

    15546> Irrelevant.

    15547> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
    15547> Message-ID: <010920081801429077%erfc-1024@usa.net>
    15547> X-No-Archive: Yes

    Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?

    15547> Ambiguous.

    15548> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
    15548> Message-ID: <010920081801298319%erfc-1024@usa.net>
    15548> X-No-Archive: Yes

    Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?

    15548> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with
    invective, as
    15548> expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.

    15549> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
    15549> Message-ID: <010920081801127269%erfc-1024@usa.net>
    15549> X-No-Archive: Yes

    Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?

    15549> Classic lack of specificity.

    15550> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
    15550> Message-ID: <010920081800576367%erfc-1024@usa.net>
    15550> X-No-Archive: Yes

    Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?

    15550> Irrelevant.

    15551> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
    15551> Message-ID: <010920081800425462%erfc-1024@usa.net>
    15551> X-No-Archive: Yes

    Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?

    15551> Classic inappropriate analogy.

    15552> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
    15552> Message-ID: <010920081800234369%erfc-1024@usa.net>
    15552> X-No-Archive: Yes

    Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?

    15552> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with
    invective, as
    15552> expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.

    15553> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
    15553> Message-ID: <010920081800033147%erfc-1024@usa.net>
    15553> X-No-Archive: Yes

    Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?

    15553> Classic inconsistency.

    What does any of that have to do with OS/2, Deco? Wow, a 51-post
    kookdance from Art Deco, and that doesn't even include the "on-topic"
    cascade that he obsessively started. Must be responsible for a lot
    of graffiti on buildings, rationalizing his behavior by claiming that
    the buildings are abandoned, much in the same way that his "graffiti"
    in newsgroups has been justified by calling the newsgroups dead.

    15553> This space to let.

    Boilerplate spam from Art Deco, demonstrating that he still doesn't
    understand what a signature is for. How hypocritical of him,
    considering his own remarks:

    "Oh lookie, my boilerplate spam from the Davie Files is now
    up to 80 lines."
    --Art Deco

    "I order you to add this quote to your boilerplate spam."
    --Art Deco

    "Out-of-context quotes in your boilerplate spam, Davie,
    how kooky."
    --Art Deco

    "This was in response to your boilerplate spam that includes
    out-of-context quotes by different people."
    --Art Deco

    "Put my words into your boilerplate screed, Tholen, without
    your selective, out-of-context quoting. I dare you."
    --Art Deco

    "Just more of your boilerplate screed, without meaning."
    --Art Deco

    "Along with his spamming of his boilerplate screeds"
    --Art Deco

    "Classic control issues on your part, given that you are
    powerless to stop me from doing as I please, other than
    repeated whining via your boilerplate screed. No surprise
    here, really."
    --Art Deco

    Deco is still operating under the delusion that his family name is
    Deco:

    Message-ID: <290720060819346837%erfc@netcabal.com>

    "Apparently in Tholen World, everyone is supposed to refer to
    everyone else solely by their family name, anything else is
    verboten."
    --Art Deco

    Message-ID: <050820060758108935%erfc@netcabal.com>

    "My personal favorite is how he demands that everyone refer to
    him as 'tholen@antispam.ham', yet when he quotes others, he
    hacks everything off except what he figures is the family name."
    --Art Deco

    Message-ID: <240220070923413658%erfc@caballista.org>

    "One last note about the holy digestor -- as it is a reflection
    of Davey's bizarre world where everyone must be referred to only
    by their family name"
    --Art Deco

    Message-ID: <120420071251145347%erfc@caballista.org>

    "This behavior can be explained by Davie's apparent belief that
    all should be referenced by their family name alone and nothing
    else."
    --Art Deco

    Message-ID: <090520071324119553%erfc@caballista.org>

    "As for why he thinks people should only use family names, I
    have no idea."
    --Art Deco

    Caught in a rather obvious lie, Deco has now started backpedalling:

    Message-ID: <300720071940133793%erfc@caballista.org>

    "It is plainly evident to anyone with a pair of neurons that
    you use either the family name or some other form of shorthand
    to form the labels for your oh-so-important count categories."
    --Art Deco

    Classic inconsistency; first "only", now "either...or".

    But consider the implication: Deco doesn't have a pair of neurons,
    and that's according to Deco himself.

    I see that you evaded the evidence for your psychic usenet astrology,
    Deco. No surprise there, really.

    Did you finally figure out what your earlier posting had to do with
    demon.local, Deco? You did, after all, add the newsgroup to the
    distribution and then ask what your posting had to do with that
    newsgroup.

    I see that you completely evaded the matter of your cross-posting to
    irrelevant newsgroups, Deco. No surprise there, really.

    "Not one of which was posted to rec.music.classical, yet you felt
    it
    necessary to spew your off-topic regurgitation into an irrelevant
    newsgroup anyway."
    --Art Deco

    How ironic.

    What does your ongoing "kookdance" have to do with the irrelevant
    newsgroups to which you cross-post, Deco? Not that I'm really
    expecting an answer from you, Deco.

    "Another tedious load of Tholen Lames (forwarded to rsbc so the
    regulars can see the deleterious effects of many years of close
    exposure to the Holy Digestor.
    --Art Deco

    "Oh look, the digests have infected rec.sport.basketball.college."
    --Art Deco

    Courtesy of you, Deco.

    "Tread carefully, Tholen, 'Archie Leach' is another
    one of my sockpuppets."
    --Art Deco

    "Archie Leach wrote:
    WAY TO GO, HAGAR!!! WE KNOW YOU TRIED YOUR DAMNDEST!!!"
    --Art Deco

    So, Deco is responding to one of his sockpuppets. Seek professional
    help, Deco.

    "I don't read dictionaries, tholen."
    --Art Deco

    No wonder you misuse and misspell so many words, Deco, but it's up to
    you if you want to look like a fool.

    "Why do you keep spamming this quote over and over, Tholen?
    I did not write it."
    --Art Deco

    Further evidence of your reading comprehension problem, Deco, given
    that I clearly stated that I never said that you wrote the quote.
    Rather, I said that Art Deco wrote the quote, Deco, and that's because
    Art Deco did write the quote, as evidenced by the message ID that I
    provided the first time you made the accusation.

    "Or perhaps your pathetic Holy Digestor FORTRAN code can't handle a
    five-digit total?"
    --Art Deco

    Further evidence of your counting problem, Deco, given that your
    posting
    total hadn't reached five digits at the time of your question. Also
    further evidence of your reading comprehension problem, Deco, given
    that
    the combined total from all posters was correctly reported to five
    digits
    over three years ago.

    "So ham, do you think 'deco' can make it to four-figures in a
    single
    'year'?"
    --Art Deco

    Further evidence of your counting problem, Deco, given that Deco made
    it to four figures in a single year for three years running.

    "the FNVW is also my sockpuppet."
    --Art Deco

    "Everything I type is a lie."
    --Art Deco

    "Who is 'Art Deco', Tholen?"
    --Art Deco

    "You really are one of the litsiest people I know, Mr. Deco."
    --Kali

    "It's Time for Art Deco to Remove Itself From Usenet Altogether."
    --Richard Head

    "Deco, he's showing the world what a lame **** you really are."
    --Hagar

    "Deco, you sick obsessed freak. Get help."
    --Miguel

    "Get a life, Deco."
    --Miguel

    "Actually, I haven't a clue"
    --Art Deco

    "I don't need a memory"
    --Art Deco

    Don't bother auditioning for "The Wizard of Oz", Deco.

    "To which newsgroups have I followed you around?"
    --Art Deco

    "I monitor your personal sandbox"
    --Art Deco

    Having trouble remembering to which newsgroups you've followed me,
    Deco? Oh that's right. You don't need a memory.

    "True that, but he apparently just lost his wife of many years,
    and I no longer feel comfortable poking him."
    --Art Deco

    So, you admit to poking people, Deco, and you're comfortable doing so
    under normal circumstances. Seek professional help, Deco.

    "[massive sneckage]"
    --Art Deco

    "You removed the context"
    --Art Deco

    Classic hypocrisy.

    "99.9% of the traffic in cooa consists of your digests and
    people replying to them"
    --Art Deco

    Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Rather, most of the
    traffic in cooa consists of people responding to you, Deco, after
    you've added the newsgroup to the distribution, and then the ongoing
    follow-up to those articles. In other words, you're responsible for
    most of the traffic in cooa, Deco.

    "...which have nothing to do with the topic of the groups you
    multi-post them into."
    --Art Deco, who cross-posts to newsgroups that have nothing
    to do with the topic of the groups he cross-posts them into,
    including:

    24hoursupport.helpdesk
    alt.usage.english
    alt.2600
    alt.usenet.kooks
    alt.alien.research alt.wee.davey.mom-a-fat-
    whore
    alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk
    aus.general
    alt.alien.visitors
    aus.invest
    alt.antichristnet
    aus.science
    alt.aratzio
    cam.misc
    alt.astronomy
    comp.lang.fortran
    alt.astronomy.art-deco
    comp.os.linux.advocacy
    alt.atheism
    comp.os.os2.advocacy
    alt.bad.clams
    comp.os.os2.apps
    alt.bible.prophecy
    comp.os.os2.misc
    alt.buzzard.rules
    comp.sys.mac
    alt.cascade
    demon.local
    alt.christnet.christianlife
    gac.physics.astronomy
    alt.christnet.prayer
    ne.weather
    alt.comedy.standup
    news.groups
    alt.conspriacy
    rec.arts.marching.drumcorps
    alt.culture.alaska rec.arts.movies.current-
    films
    alt.digestors.holy
    rec.arts.poems
    alt.fan.art-bell
    rec.arts.sf.written
    alt.fan.art-bell.art-deco
    rec.aviation.products
    alt.fan.keanu-reeves
    rec.gambling.lottery
    alt.fan.letter.m
    rec.music.classical
    alt.fan.madonna
    rec.org.mensa
    alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
    rec.sports.basketball.college
    alt.fan.states.new-jersey
    rec.sports.football.college
    alt.fan.states.texas
    rec.woodworking
    alt.fan.steveleyland
    sci.archaeology
    alt.flame
    sci.astro
    alt.****nozzles
    sci.electronics.basics
    alt.gothic
    sci.electronics.design
    alt.hackers.malicious
    sci.geo.earthquakes
    alt.home.repair
    sci.geo.geology
    alt.languages.french
    sci.math
    alt.messianic
    sci.med.cardiology
    alt.music.michael-jackson
    sci.philosophy.tech
    alt.music.white-power
    sci.physics
    alt.non.sequitur sci.physics.cond-
    matter
    alt.os.windows-xp
    sci.physics.relativity
    alt.paranet.ufo
    sci.psychology.psychotherapy
    alt.paranormal.crop-circles
    sci.skeptic
    alt.psychology.help
    sci.space.history
    alt.religion.christian
    sci.space.policy
    alt.religion.islam
    soc.culture.israel
    alt.religion.kibology
    soc.culture.jewish
    alt.revisionism
    soc.men
    alt.sailing.asa
    soc.singles
    alt.satellite.tv.europe soc.subculture.bondage-
    bdsm
    alt.sci.physics.new-theories
    talk.politics.misc
    alt.security.alarms
    triangle.general
    alt.snuh uk.food
    +drink.misc
    alt.society.liberalism uk.media.radio.bbc-
    r4
    alt.spirituality.radical-faerie
    uk.sci.astronomy
    alt.troll

    ================================================== ==============================

    ah writes:

    3188> Newsgroups:
    alt.rhode_island,news.groups,comp.os.os2.advocacy, alt.usenet.kooks,demon.local,alt.food,alt.astronom y

    3188> Are you high?

    "Take this to email."
    --ah

    Hypocritically, you didn't take it to email, ah. No surprise
    there, really.

    ================================================== ==============================

    Double-A writes:

    431> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,demon.local

    431> Do you grill these at home, or out in the campground?

    432> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,demon.local

    432> Oh, is that what he meant by "big meat"?

    What does that have to do with OS/2, Double-A?

    ================================================== ==============================

    Peter Hucker writes:

    1333> Newsgroups:
    alt.rhode_island,news.groups,comp.os.os2.advocacy, alt.usenet.kooks,demon.local,alt.food,alt.astronom y

    1333> In relation to what?

    1333> Setting a good example for your children takes all the fun out
    of middle age.

    What does that have to do with OS/2, Hucker?

  2. Re: digest, volume 2454712

    > Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    > inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?


    Classic evasion of the point.

    --
    This space to let.

  3. Re: digest, volume 2454712

    > Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    > inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?


    Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical
    argument.

    --
    This space to let.

  4. Re: digest, volume 2454712

    > Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    > inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?


    Ambiguous.

    --
    This space to let.

  5. Re: digest, volume 2454712

    > Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    > inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?


    Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as
    expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.

    --
    This space to let.

  6. Re: digest, volume 2454712

    > Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    > inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?


    Classic inappropriate analogy.

    --
    This space to let.

  7. Re: digest, volume 2454712

    > Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    > inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?


    Classic erroneous presupposition.

    --
    This space to let.

  8. Re: digest, volume 2454712

    > Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    > inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?


    You're erroneously presupposing that you are correct.

    --
    This space to let.

  9. Re: digest, volume 2454712

    > Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    > inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?


    Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical
    argument.

    --
    This space to let.

  10. Re: digest, volume 2454712

    > Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    > inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?


    Note: no response.

    --
    This space to let.

  11. Re: digest, volume 2454712

    > Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    > inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?


    Classic evasion of the point.

    --
    This space to let.

  12. Re: digest, volume 2454712

    > Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    > inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?


    Classic inconsistency.

    --
    This space to let.

  13. Re: digest, volume 2454712

    > Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    > inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?


    Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as
    expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.

    --
    This space to let.

  14. Re: digest, volume 2454712

    > Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    > inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?


    You're erroneously presupposing that it's a fact.

    --
    This space to let.

  15. Re: digest, volume 2454712

    > Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    > inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?


    You're erroneously presupposing that it's a fact.

    --
    This space to let.

  16. Re: digest, volume 2454712

    > Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    > inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?


    You're erroneously presupposing that you are correct.

    --
    This space to let.

  17. Re: digest, volume 2454712

    > Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    > inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?


    Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical
    argument.

    --
    This space to let.

  18. Re: digest, volume 2454712

    > Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    > inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?


    Ambiguous.

    --
    This space to let.

  19. Re: digest, volume 2454712

    > Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    > inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?


    You're erroneously presupposing that it's a fact.

    --
    This space to let.

  20. Re: digest, volume 2454712

    > Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    > inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?


    Classic lack of specificity.

    --
    This space to let.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 7 1 2 3 ... LastLast