Re: digest, volume 2454712 - OS2

This is a discussion on Re: digest, volume 2454712 - OS2 ; > Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky, > inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco? Classic evasion of the point. -- This space to let....

+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 60 of 124

Thread: Re: digest, volume 2454712

  1. Re: digest, volume 2454712

    > Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    > inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?


    Classic evasion of the point.

    --
    This space to let.

  2. Re: digest, volume 2454712

    > Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    > inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?


    Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

    --
    This space to let.

  3. Re: digest, volume 2454712

    > Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    > inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?


    Classic erroneous presupposition.

    --
    This space to let.

  4. Re: digest, volume 2454712

    > Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    > inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?


    Liar.

    --
    This space to let.

  5. Re: digest, volume 2454712

    > Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    > inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?


    Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical
    argument.

    --
    This space to let.

  6. Re: digest, volume 2454712

    > Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    > inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?


    Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical
    argument.

    --
    This space to let.

  7. Re: digest, volume 2454712

    > Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    > inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?


    Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

    --
    This space to let.

  8. Re: digest, volume 2454712

    > Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    > inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?


    Classic failure to comprehend the point.

    --
    This space to let.

  9. Re: digest, volume 2454712

    > Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    > inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?


    Classic inconsistency.

    --
    This space to let.

  10. Re: digest, volume 2454712

    > Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    > inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?


    How ironic.

    --
    This space to let.

  11. Re: digest, volume 2454712

    > Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    > inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?


    Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as
    expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.

    --
    This space to let.

  12. Re: digest, volume 2454712

    > Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    > inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?


    Classic evasion of the point.

    --
    This space to let.

  13. Re: digest, volume 2454712

    > Still afraid of having Google archive the evidence for your kooky,
    > inconsistent, and hypocritical behavior, Deco?


    Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

    --
    This space to let.

  14. Re: digest, volume 2454712

    > What does any of that have to do with OS/2, Deco?

    Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical
    argument.

    --
    This space to let.

  15. Re: digest, volume 2454712

    > Wow, a 51-post
    > kookdance from Art Deco, and that doesn't even include the "on-topic"
    > cascade that he obsessively started.


    Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

    --
    This space to let.

  16. Re: digest, volume 2454712

    > Must be responsible for a lot
    > of graffiti on buildings, rationalizing his behavior by claiming that
    > the buildings are abandoned, much in the same way that his "graffiti"
    > in newsgroups has been justified by calling the newsgroups dead.


    Classic inappropriate analogy.

    --
    This space to let.

  17. Re: digest, volume 2454712

    > Boilerplate spam from Art Deco, demonstrating that he still doesn't
    > understand what a signature is for.


    Irrelevant.

    --
    This space to let.

  18. Re: digest, volume 2454712

    > How hypocritical of him,
    > considering his own remarks.


    Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

    --
    This space to let.

  19. Re: digest, volume 2454712

    > Deco is still operating under the delusion that his family name is
    > Deco.


    Classic pontification.

    --
    This space to let.

  20. Re: digest, volume 2454712

    > Caught in a rather obvious lie, Deco has now started backpedalling.

    You're erroneously presupposing that it's a fact.

    --
    This space to let.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 ... LastLast