jtpmalloy wrote:

>Art Deco wrote:
>
>>>> Who is "nelohT", Malloy? There is nobody in this newsgroup using
>>>> that alias.
>
>>> And yet Tholen responds nonetheless, nelohT; QED, Tholen. Heel, Tholen!
>>> Now play dead, Tholen! Good boy, Tholen!
>
>> Tholen|nelohT demands that you identify him/her/it as "Tholen";
>> anything else, such as a pet nickname, indicates that you are suffering
>> from the fatal illness known as "attribution problems."
>
>Heh. It's so easy to yank Tholen|nelohT's chain and watch him spew!

I really like how he claims that other people are responsible for his
posts, it's my all-time favorite Tholen|nelohT lame excuse.

--
"Classic erroneous presupposition."
-- David Tholen

:nelohT Double email

>15452> Here's a hint for you, Tholen, you multi-post your off-topic**
>digests
>15452> into three different newsgroups.
>15452> See if you can sort it out.
>
>Classic erroneous presupposition.

I didn't think for a nanosecond that you would be able to sort out the
clue, Tholen.

>15451> Another 23 kbytes of multi-posted Tholen lames.
>
>Classic erroneous presupposition. Still suffering from reading
>comprehension
>problems, Deco? The self-described "lames" are yours, Deco.

Classic lie, Tholen, those 23 kbytes of lames are your words, not mine.
I'll go ahead and assume that you won't be posting any Message-IDs to
back up your latest desperate attempt to hide your obvious tracks.

>15457> I have never claimed that anyone forces me to post anything,
>15457> and I'll be waiting for you provide a single Message-ID that
>indicates
>15457> otherwise.
>
>Sure thing, Deco, just as soon as you produce a single Message-ID that
>indicates where I allegedly claimed that anyone forces me to post
>anything.

Sure thing, Tholen, here it is:

From: "tholen@antispam.ham"
Message-ID:


| "Oh look, the digests have infected rec.sport.basketball.college."
| --Art Deco
|
|Courtesy of you, Deco.

Repeated over and over and over again, you state that I'm responsible
for the posts you send. Yet they are your posts, and that truth will
not change regardless of the amount of illogic and blanket denials that
you throw up into air.

>Rather hypocritical of you to demand the sort of evidence
>that you are unwilling to provide for your own claims, Deco.

Your decision to blind yourself to the plainly evident truth with
"classic erroneous presuppositions" and blanket denials isn't my
problem, Tholen. I've presented the evidence: "Courtesy of you,
Deco."

>However,
>I have over 15000 Message-IDs that demonstrate how you are forced to
>post something, Deco,

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahah

All carefully sorted, cataloged, indexed, and available for future
reference, no doubt. Only you, Tholen, could make such an absurd leap
from your post counting to believing that it somehow indicates I'm
forced. I can assure you, Tholen, my posts are all quite voluntary.

>quite independently of any self-proclamation
>from you.

And then right in the same sentence you admit that you have no evidence
for your whacky claim. Well done, Tholen, hahahahahahahahahahahahaha.

Since I've called your "single Message-ID" bluff, Tholen, it looks like
you need to post all 15,000 Message-IDs now.

At this point you should be asking yourself why you care so much about
what I post that you need to file *15000* Message-IDs. Think about it.

>15457> 1) CEP lie
>15457> 2) CEP deny
>15457> 3) IKYABWAI
>15457> 4) grammar/typo pounce
>15457> 5) 'tard lame
>15457> 6) "you did it too"
>15457> 7) snip-n-run
>
>Resorting to projection once again, eh Deco?

Another 'tard lame, Tholen. And I like that lits, it looks good in the
..sig file.

--
Teh Way of Teh Tholen|nelohT:

* lie
* deny
* IKYABWAI
* grammar/typo pounce
* 'tard lame
* "you did it too"
* snip-n-run

:nelohT Double email

>alias # today total year 5 year 4 year 3 year 2
>year 1
>-------------- ------- ----- ------ ------ ------ ------
>------
>deco 7 518 3989 4393 3722
>2268 0

Next lits, Tholen. You know the drill, I'm forcing you to post.

--
Teh Way of Teh Tholen|nelohT:

* lie
* deny
* IKYABWAI
* grammar/typo pounce
* 'tard lame
* "you did it too"
* snip-n-run

:nelohT Double email

>-- Art Deco writes: Still suffering from attribution
>problems, Deco? Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>Classic erroneous presupposition.Still suffering from
>reading comprehension problems, Deco?The self-described
>"lames" are yours, Deco. Classic erroneous presupposition.
>Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? Classic
>unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Classic unsubstantiated
>and erroneous claim coupled with a classic erroneous
>presupposition. Classic erroneous presupposition. Classic
>erroneous presupposition coupled with a classic
>unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Classic erroneous
>presupposition. Still suffering from attribution problems,
>Deco? Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Non
>sequitur. Classic erroneous presupposition. Classic
>erroneous presupposition. Classic erroneous presupposition.
>Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? Classic
>unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Classic unsubstantiated
>and erroneous claim. Classic erroneous presupposition. Still
>suffering from reading comprehension problems, Deco?It had
>nothing to do with comp.os.os2.advocacy. Who is
>"Tholen|nelohT", Deco?There is nobody in this newsgroup
>using that alias. Classic erroneous presupposition. Still
>suffering from attribution problems, Deco? Classic
>unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Classic unsubstantiated
>and erroneous claim.Still suffering from counting problems,
>Deco?One posting to a newsgroup does not constitute a
>multi-post, Deco. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous
>claim.Still suffering from counting problems, Deco?One
>posting to a newsgroup does not constitute a multi-post,
>Deco. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.Still
>suffering from counting problems, Deco?One posting to a
>newsgroup does not constitute a multi-post, Deco. Classic
>unsubstantiated and erroneous claim on your part, Deco. Sure
>thing, Deco, just as soon as you produce a single Message-ID
>that indicates where I allegedly claimed that anyone forces
>me to post anything.Rather hypocritical of you to demand the
>sort of evidence that you are unwilling to provide for your
>own claims, Deco.However, I have over 15000 Message-IDs that
>demonstrate how you are forced to post something, Deco,
>quite independently of any self-proclamation from you.
>Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Classic
>unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Classic erroneous
>presupposition. Resorting to projection once again, eh Deco?
>Classic ambiguity. Classic erroneous presupposition.
>Boilerplate spam from Art Deco, demonstrating that he still
>doesn't understand what a signature is for.How hypocritical
>of him, considering his own remarks: Deco is still operating
>under the delusion that his family name is Deco: Caught in a
>rather obvious lie, Deco has now started backpedalling:
>Classic inconsistency; first "only", now "either...or". But
>consider the implicationeco doesn't have a pair of
>neurons, and that's according to Deco himself. I see that
>you evaded the evidence for your psychic usenet astrology,
>Deco.No surprise there, really. Did you finally figure out
>what your earlier posting had to do with demon.local,
>Deco?You did, after all, add the newsgroup to the
>distribution and then ask what your posting had to do with
>that newsgroup. I see that you completely evaded the matter
>of your cross-posting to irrelevant newsgroups, Deco.No
>surprise there, really. How ironic. What does your ongoing
>"kookdance" have to do with the irrelevant newsgroups to
>which you cross-post, Deco?Not that I'm really expecting an
>answer from you, Deco. Courtesy of you, Deco. So, Deco is
>responding to one of his sockpuppets.Seek professional help,
>Deco. No wonder you misuse and misspell so many words, Deco,
>but it's up to you if you want to look like a fool. Further
>evidence of your reading comprehension problem, Deco, given
>that I clearly stated that I never said that you wrote the
>quote. Rather, I said that Art Deco wrote the quote, Deco,
>and that's because Art Deco did write the quote, as
>evidenced by the message ID that I provided the first time
>you made the accusation. Further evidence of your counting
>problem, Deco, given that your posting total hadn't reached
>five digits at the time of your question.Also further
>evidence of your reading comprehension problem, Deco, given
>that the combined total from all posters was correctly
>reported to five digits over three years ago. Further
>evidence of your counting problem, Deco, given that Deco
>made it to four figures in a single year for three years
>running. Don't bother auditioning for "The Wizard of Oz",
>Deco. Having trouble remembering to which newsgroups you've
>followed me, Deco?Oh that's right.You don't need a memory.
>So, you admit to poking people, Deco, and you're comfortable
>doing so under normal circumstances.Seek professional help,
>Deco. Classic hypocrisy. Classic unsubstantiated and
>erroneous claim.Rather, most of the traffic in cooa consists
>of people responding to you, Deco, after you've added the
>newsgroup to the distribution, and then the ongoing
>follow-up to those articles.In other words, you're
>responsible for most of the traffic in cooa, Deco.
>24hoursupport.helpdesk alt.usage.english alt.2600
>alt.usenet.kooks alt.alien.researchalt.wee.davey.mom-a-fat-
>whore alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk aus.general
>alt.alien.visitors aus.invest alt.antichristnet aus.science
>alt.aratzio cam.misc alt.astronomy comp.lang.fortran
>alt.astronomy.art-deco comp.os.linux.advocacy alt.atheism
>comp.os.os2.advocacy alt.bad.clams comp.os.os2.apps
>alt.bible.prophecy comp.os.os2.misc alt.buzzard.rules
>comp.sys.mac alt.cascade demon.local
>alt.christnet.christianlife gac.physics.astronomy
>alt.christnet.prayer ne.weather alt.comedy.standup
>news.groups alt.conspriacy rec.arts.marching.drumcorps
>alt.culture.alaskarec.arts.movies.current- films
>alt.digestors.holy rec.arts.poems alt.fan.art-bell
>rec.arts.sf.written alt.fan.art-bell.art-deco
>rec.aviation.products alt.fan.keanu-reeves
>rec.gambling.lottery alt.fan.letter.m rec.music.classical
>alt.fan.madonna rec.org.mensa alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
>rec.sports.basketball.college alt.fan.states.new-jersey
>rec.sports.football.college alt.fan.states.texas
>rec.woodworking alt.fan.steveleyland sci.archaeology
>alt.flame sci.astro alt.****nozzles sci.electronics.basics
>alt.gothic sci.electronics.design alt.hackers.malicious
>sci.geo.earthquakes alt.home.repair sci.geo.geology
>alt.languages.french sci.math alt.messianic
>sci.med.cardiology alt.music.michael-jackson
>sci.philosophy.tech alt.music.white-power sci.physics
>alt.non.sequitursci.physics.cond- matter alt.os.windows-xp
>sci.physics.relativity alt.paranet.ufo
>sci.psychology.psychotherapy alt.paranormal.crop-circles
>sci.skeptic alt.psychology.help sci.space.history
>alt.religion.christian sci.space.policy alt.religion.islam
>soc.culture.israel alt.religion.kibology soc.culture.jewish
>alt.revisionism soc.men alt.sailing.asa soc.singles
>alt.satellite.tv.europe soc.subculture.bondage- bdsm
>alt.sci.physics.new-theories talk.politics.misc
>alt.security.alarms triangle.general alt.snuhuk.food
>+drink.misc alt.society.liberalismuk.media.radio.bbc- r4
>alt.spirituality.radical-faerie uk.sci.astronomy alt.troll
>TheBookman writes: What does that have to do with OS/2,
>TheBookman? Henry Schmidt writes: What does any of that have
>to do with OS/2, Schmidt? -- Art Deco writes: Still
>suffering from attribution problems, Deco? Classic
>unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Classic erroneous
>presupposition.Still suffering from reading comprehension
>problems, Deco?The self-described "lames" are yours, Deco.
>Classic erroneous presupposition. Still suffering from
>attribution problems, Deco? Classic unsubstantiated and
>erroneous claim. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim
>coupled with a classic erroneous presupposition. Classic
>erroneous presupposition. Classic erroneous presupposition
>coupled with a classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>Classic erroneous presupposition. Still suffering from
>attribution problems, Deco? Classic unsubstantiated and
>erroneous claim. Non sequitur. Classic erroneous
>presupposition. Classic erroneous presupposition. Classic
>erroneous presupposition. Still suffering from attribution
>problems, Deco? Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Classic
>erroneous presupposition. Still suffering from reading
>comprehension problems, Deco?It had nothing to do with
>comp.os.os2.advocacy. Who is "Tholen|nelohT", Deco?There is
>nobody in this newsgroup using that alias. Classic erroneous
>presupposition. Still suffering from attribution problems,
>Deco? Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Classic
>unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.Still suffering from
>counting problems, Deco?One posting to a newsgroup does not
>constitute a multi-post, Deco. Classic unsubstantiated and
>erroneous claim.Still suffering from counting problems,
>Deco?One posting to a newsgroup does not constitute a
>multi-post, Deco. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous
>claim.Still suffering from counting problems, Deco?One
>posting to a newsgroup does not constitute a multi-post,
>Deco. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim on your
>part, Deco. Sure thing, Deco, just as soon as you produce a
>single Message-ID that indicates where I allegedly claimed
>that anyone forces me to post anything.Rather hypocritical
>of you to demand the sort of evidence that you are unwilling
>to provide for your own claims, Deco.However, I have over
>15000 Message-IDs that demonstrate how you are forced to
>post something, Deco, quite independently of any
>self-proclamation from you. Classic unsubstantiated and
>erroneous claim. Classic erroneous presupposition. Resorting
>to projection once again, eh Deco? Classic ambiguity.
>Classic erroneous presupposition. Boilerplate spam from Art
>Deco, demonstrating that he still doesn't understand what a
>signature is for.How hypocritical of him, considering his
>own remarks: Deco is still operating under the delusion that
>his family name is Deco: Caught in a rather obvious lie,
>Deco has now started backpedalling: Classic inconsistency;
>first "only", now "either...or". But consider the
>implicationeco doesn't have a pair of neurons, and that's
>according to Deco himself. I see that you evaded the
>evidence for your psychic usenet astrology, Deco.No surprise
>there, really. Did you finally figure out what your earlier
>posting had to do with demon.local, Deco?You did, after all,
>add the newsgroup to the distribution and then ask what your
>posting had to do with that newsgroup. I see that you
>completely evaded the matter of your cross-posting to
>irrelevant newsgroups, Deco.No surprise there, really. How
>ironic. What does your ongoing "kookdance" have to do with
>the irrelevant newsgroups to which you cross-post, Deco?Not
>that I'm really expecting an answer from you, Deco. Courtesy
>of you, Deco. So, Deco is responding to one of his
>sockpuppets.Seek professional help, Deco. No wonder you
>misuse and misspell so many words, Deco, but it's up to you
>if you want to look like a fool. Further evidence of your
>reading comprehension problem, Deco, given that I clearly
>stated that I never said that you wrote the quote. Rather, I
>said that Art Deco wrote the quote, Deco, and that's because
>Art Deco did write the quote, as evidenced by the message ID
>that I provided the first time you made the accusation.
>Further evidence of your counting problem, Deco, given that
>your posting total hadn't reached five digits at the time of
>your question.Also further evidence of your reading
>comprehension problem, Deco, given that the combined total
>from all posters was correctly reported to five digits over
>three years ago. Further evidence of your counting problem,
>Deco, given that Deco made it to four figures in a single
>year for three years running. Don't bother auditioning for
>"The Wizard of Oz", Deco. Having trouble remembering to
>which newsgroups you've followed me, Deco?Oh that's
>right.You don't need a memory. So, you admit to poking
>people, Deco, and you're comfortable doing so under normal
>circumstances.Seek professional help, Deco. Classic
>hypocrisy. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous
>claim.Rather, most of the traffic in cooa consists of people
>responding to you, Deco, after you've added the newsgroup to
>the distribution, and then the ongoing follow-up to those
>articles.In other words, you're responsible for most of the
>traffic in cooa, Deco. 24hoursupport.helpdesk
>alt.usage.english alt.2600 alt.usenet.kooks
>alt.alien.researchalt.wee.davey.mom-a-fat- whore
>alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk aus.general
>alt.alien.visitors aus.invest alt.antichristnet aus.science
>alt.aratzio cam.misc alt.astronomy comp.lang.fortran
>alt.astronomy.art-deco comp.os.linux.advocacy alt.atheism
>comp.os.os2.advocacy alt.bad.clams comp.os.os2.apps
>alt.bible.prophecy comp.os.os2.misc alt.buzzard.rules
>comp.sys.mac alt.cascade demon.local
>alt.christnet.christianlife gac.physics.astronomy
>alt.christnet.prayer ne.weather alt.comedy.standup
>news.groups alt.conspriacy rec.arts.marching.drumcorps
>alt.culture.alaskarec.arts.movies.current- films
>alt.digestors.holy rec.arts.poems alt.fan.art-bell
>rec.arts.sf.written alt.fan.art-bell.art-deco
>rec.aviation.products alt.fan.keanu-reeves
>rec.gambling.lottery alt.fan.letter.m rec.music.classical
>alt.fan.madonna rec.org.mensa alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
>rec.sports.basketball.college alt.fan.states.new-jersey
>rec.sports.football.college alt.fan.states.texas
>rec.woodworking alt.fan.steveleyland sci.archaeology
>alt.flame sci.astro alt.****nozzles sci.electronics.basics
>alt.gothic sci.electronics.design alt.hackers.malicious
>sci.geo.earthquakes alt.home.repair sci.geo.geology
>alt.languages.french sci.math alt.messianic
>sci.med.cardiology alt.music.michael-jackson
>sci.philosophy.tech alt.music.white-power sci.physics
>alt.non.sequitursci.physics.cond- matter alt.os.windows-xp
>sci.physics.relativity alt.paranet.ufo
>sci.psychology.psychotherapy alt.paranormal.crop-circles
>sci.skeptic alt.psychology.help sci.space.history
>alt.religion.christian sci.space.policy alt.religion.islam
>soc.culture.israel alt.religion.kibology soc.culture.jewish
>alt.revisionism soc.men alt.sailing.asa soc.singles
>alt.satellite.tv.europe soc.subculture.bondage- bdsm
>alt.sci.physics.new-theories talk.politics.misc
>alt.security.alarms triangle.general alt.snuhuk.food
>+drink.misc alt.society.liberalismuk.media.radio.bbc- r4
>alt.spirituality.radical-faerie uk.sci.astronomy alt.troll
>alias# today total year 5 year 4 year 3 year 2 year 1
>-------------- ------- ----- ------ ------ ------ ------
>------ deco 7 518 3989 4393 3722 22680 ****brain 143520445
>90 00 ah 108 1122669320 1120 snarky6501030 00
>nobuyout3255950 00 homintern 26050 00 yardwork19000 00
>goat15030 00 meow14011 40 demon 100 60 11 00 bisectional6 43
>33154 3770 smart3000 00 harding2310 00 pinku140 24 20
>plastic1000 00 pluto1 4480 00 riffuceus1000 00
>-------------- ------- -------------------- ------ ------ 17
>7 965117441135911687 910010033 -- Art Deco writes: Still
>suffering from attribution problems, Deco? Classic
>unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Classic erroneous
>presupposition.Still suffering from reading comprehension
>problems, Deco?The self-described "lames" are yours, Deco.
>Classic erroneous presupposition. Still suffering from
>attribution problems, Deco? Classic unsubstantiated and
>erroneous claim. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim
>coupled with a classic erroneous presupposition. Classic
>erroneous presupposition. Classic erroneous presupposition
>coupled with a classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>Classic erroneous presupposition. Still suffering from
>attribution problems, Deco? Classic unsubstantiated and
>erroneous claim. Non sequitur. Classic erroneous
>presupposition. Classic erroneous presupposition. Classic
>erroneous presupposition. Still suffering from attribution
>problems, Deco? Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Classic
>erroneous presupposition. Still suffering from reading
>comprehension problems, Deco?It had nothing to do with
>comp.os.os2.advocacy. Who is "Tholen|nelohT", Deco?There is
>nobody in this newsgroup using that alias. Classic erroneous
>presupposition. Still suffering from attribution problems,
>Deco? Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Classic
>unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.Still suffering from
>counting problems, Deco?One posting to a newsgroup does not
>constitute a multi-post, Deco. Classic unsubstantiated and
>erroneous claim.Still suffering from counting problems,
>Deco?One posting to a newsgroup does not constitute a
>multi-post, Deco. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous
>claim.Still suffering from counting problems, Deco?One
>posting to a newsgroup does not constitute a multi-post,
>Deco. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim on your
>part, Deco. Sure thing, Deco, just as soon as you produce a
>single Message-ID that indicates where I allegedly claimed
>that anyone forces me to post anything.Rather hypocritical
>of you to demand the sort of evidence that you are unwilling
>to provide for your own claims, Deco.However, I have over
>15000 Message-IDs that demonstrate how you are forced to
>post something, Deco, quite independently of any
>self-proclamation from you. Classic unsubstantiated and
>erroneous claim. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous
>claim. Classic erroneous presupposition. Resorting to
>projection once again, eh Deco? Classic ambiguity. Classic
>erroneous presupposition. Boilerplate spam from Art Deco,
>demonstrating that he still doesn't understand what a
>signature is for.How hypocritical of him, considering his
>own remarks: Deco is still operating under the delusion that
>his family name is Deco: Caught in a rather obvious lie,
>Deco has now started backpedalling: Classic inconsistency;
>first "only", now "either...or". But consider the
>implicationeco doesn't have a pair of neurons, and that's
>according to Deco himself. I see that you evaded the
>evidence for your psychic usenet astrology, Deco.No surprise
>there, really. Did you finally figure out what your earlier
>posting had to do with demon.local, Deco?You did, after all,
>add the newsgroup to the distribution and then ask what your
>posting had to do with that newsgroup. I see that you
>completely evaded the matter of your cross-posting to
>irrelevant newsgroups, Deco.No surprise there, really. How
>ironic. What does your ongoing "kookdance" have to do with
>the irrelevant newsgroups to which you cross-post, Deco?Not
>that I'm really expecting an answer from you, Deco. Courtesy
>of you, Deco. So, Deco is responding to one of his
>sockpuppets.Seek professional help, Deco. No wonder you
>misuse and misspell so many words, Deco, but it's up to you
>if you want to look like a fool. Further evidence of your
>reading comprehension problem, Deco, given that I clearly
>stated that I never said that you wrote the quote. Rather, I
>said that Art Deco wrote the quote, Deco, and that's because
>Art Deco did write the quote, as evidenced by the message ID
>that I provided the first time you made the accusation.
>Further evidence of your counting problem, Deco, given that
>your posting total hadn't reached five digits at the time of
>your question.Also further evidence of your reading
>comprehension problem, Deco, given that the combined total
>from all posters was correctly reported to five digits over
>three years ago. Further evidence of your counting problem,
>Deco, given that Deco made it to four figures in a single
>year for three years running. Don't bother auditioning for
>"The Wizard of Oz", Deco. Having trouble remembering to
>which newsgroups you've followed me, Deco?Oh that's
>right.You don't need a memory. So, you admit to poking
>people, Deco, and you're comfortable doing so under normal
>circumstances.Seek professional help, Deco. Classic
>hypocrisy. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous
>claim.Rather, most of the traffic in cooa consists of people
>responding to you, Deco, after you've added the newsgroup to
>the distribution, and then the ongoing follow-up to those
>articles.In other words, you're responsible for most of the
>traffic in cooa, Deco. 24hoursupport.helpdesk
>alt.usage.english alt.2600 alt.usenet.kooks
>alt.alien.researchalt.wee.davey.mom-a-fat- whore
>alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk aus.general
>alt.alien.visitors aus.invest alt.antichristnet aus.science
>alt.aratzio cam.misc alt.astronomy comp.lang.fortran
>alt.astronomy.art-deco comp.os.linux.advocacy alt.atheism
>comp.os.os2.advocacy alt.bad.clams comp.os.os2.apps
>alt.bible.prophecy comp.os.os2.misc alt.buzzard.rules
>comp.sys.mac alt.cascade demon.local
>alt.christnet.christianlife gac.physics.astronomy
>alt.christnet.prayer ne.weather alt.comedy.standup
>news.groups alt.conspriacy rec.arts.marching.drumcorps
>alt.culture.alaskarec.arts.movies.current- films
>alt.digestors.holy rec.arts.poems alt.fan.art-bell
>rec.arts.sf.written alt.fan.art-bell.art-deco
>rec.aviation.products alt.fan.keanu-reeves
>rec.gambling.lottery alt.fan.letter.m rec.music.classical
>alt.fan.madonna rec.org.mensa alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
>rec.sports.basketball.college alt.fan.states.new-jersey
>rec.sports.football.college alt.fan.states.texas
>rec.woodworking alt.fan.steveleyland sci.archaeology
>alt.flame sci.astro alt.****nozzles sci.electronics.basics
>alt.gothic sci.electronics.design alt.hackers.malicious
>sci.geo.earthquakes alt.home.repair sci.geo.geology
>alt.languages.french sci.math alt.messianic
>sci.med.cardiology alt.music.michael-jackson
>sci.philosophy.tech alt.music.white-power sci.physics
>alt.non.sequitursci.physics.cond- matter alt.os.windows-xp
>sci.physics.relativity alt.paranet.ufo
>sci.psychology.psychotherapy alt.paranormal.crop-circles
>sci.skeptic alt.psychology.help sci.space.history
>alt.religion.christian sci.space.policy alt.religion.islam
>soc.culture.israel alt.religion.kibology soc.culture.jewish
>alt.revisionism soc.men alt.sailing.asa soc.singles
>alt.satellite.tv.europe soc.subculture.bondage- bdsm
>alt.sci.physics.new-theories talk.politics.misc
>alt.security.alarms triangle.general alt.snuhuk.food
>+drink.misc alt.society.liberalismuk.media.radio.bbc- r4
>alt.spirituality.radical-faerie uk.sci.astronomy alt.troll
>TheBookman writes: What does that have to do with college
>basketball, TheBookman? Henry Schmidt writes: What does any
>of that have to do with college basketball, Schmidt?

2,700 words of lamery that you posted separately to three different
newsgroups, Tholen.

--
Teh Way of Teh Tholen|nelohT:

* lie
* deny
* IKYABWAI
* grammar/typo pounce
* 'tard lame
* "you did it too"
* snip-n-run

Right on cue, "Totally unorganized", "total flake", "totally off the
wall" Joseph Malloy writes:

403> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy

403> Heh. It's so easy to yank Tholen|nelohT's chain and watch him
spew!

Who is "Tholen|nelohT", Malloy? There is nobody in this newsgroup
using
that alias.

At least this time you didn't stupidly deny having written "Tholeln"
in a subject line prior to a particular date, Malloy. Of course,
you're the one who likes to portray himself as someone who doesn't
know what he's talking about:

"me: 'Do you have Os/2?'

them: 'What's ohh-esstu, dude?'

me: 'Beats me.'"
--Joe Malloy

You also like to portray yourself as an astrologer by altering
subject lines:

] Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2007 16:11:26 -0500
] From: jmalloy
] User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207)
] Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
] Subject: Re: Tholen's waste of electrons digest, volume 2454133
] Message-ID: <45c64bfe$0$28131$4c368faf@roadrunner.com>

"Especially since the astrologer doesn't realize that electrons
are re-used."
--Joe Malloy, astrologer

"My true motivation is to expose Tholen as a waster of electrons"
--Joe Malloy, astrologer (2007 Dec 11)

Still waiting for a response to:

Q: Who was ignored for the better part of two years but continued to
harass the person ignoring him, going to the extent of seeking out
postings made by that person in other newsgroups for purposes of
exporting that harassment to those other newsgroups?

A: Malloy.

Q: Who is a non-OS/2 user harassing an OS/2 user in an OS/2
newsgroup?

A: Malloy.

Q: Who keeps alleged "terabytes" of alleged "foolishness" for
reference
purposes?

A: "In fact, I've *terabytes* of your foolishness!"
--Joe Malloy

Obsession: thy name is Malloy.

193 postings from Deco, and not a peep from Malloy about them.
Classic
inconsistency.

Also rather hypocritical of you to waste electrons by posting, Malloy.

I see that you didn't bother to answer several questions, Malloy. No
surprise there, really.

"Man sagt: Sie sind ein Misanthrop!"
--Joe Malloy, plagiarist

Message-ID:

"No wonder he's trying to be a kook like Tholen!"
--Joe Malloy

Message-ID:

"Meanwhile, we've seen your posts many, many, oh-so-often many
times
before, you kook."
--Joe Malloy

"It takes a kook to recognize another kook, Tholen."
--Joe Malloy

Ergo, Joe Malloy must believe that Joe Malloy is a kook.

[N.B.: Malloy won't include the above when he pretends to respond
because he's too embarrassed by them!]

And another prediction came true.

:nelohT Double email

>Who is "Tholen|nelohT", Malloy? There is nobody in this newsgroup
>using
>that alias.

I see that you are still incapable of wrapping text correctly, Tholen.

--
Teh Way of Teh Tholen|nelohT:

* lie
* deny
* IKYABWAI
* grammar/typo pounce
* 'tard lame
* "you did it too"
* snip-n-run

--
Art Deco writes:

15458> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy

15458> :nelohT

Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?

15458> Double email

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

15458> I didn't think for a nanosecond that you would be able to sort
out the
15458> clue, Tholen.

Classic erroneous presupposition.

15458> Classic lie, Tholen,

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

15458> those 23 kbytes of lames are your words, not mine.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Still suffering from
reading comprehension problems, Deco?

15458> I'll go ahead and assume that you won't be posting any Message-
IDs to
15458> back up your latest desperate attempt to hide your obvious
tracks.

Classic erroneous presupposition.

15458> Sure thing, Tholen, here it is:

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Still suffering from
reading comprehension problems, Deco? There is no claim from me in
the text that you quoted stating that I'm being forced to post by you.
There is, however, text that notes the fact that you started
cross-posting your replies to rec.sport.basketball.college, even
though the articles to which you were replying weren't posted there
in the first place. Among your replies that you started cross-posting
to rec.sport.basketball.college were replies to digests, thus you were
responsible for infecting rec.sport.basketball.college with the
digests.
How you somehow managed to twist that into some claim that I'm being
forced to post by you demonstrates just how twisted your mind has
become,
Deco.

demon.local is also infested with the digests, Deco, courtesy of you.
Take, for example, Message-ID <070620081604116672%erfc-1024@usa.net>,
which is "digest, volume 2454618" and appears in demon.local, but I
didn't put it there, Deco. You did.

Cue the spin doctoring by Deco.

15458> Repeated over and over and over again, you state that I'm
responsible
15458> for the posts you send.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Still suffering from
reading comprehension problems, Deco?

15458> Yet they are your posts,

Irrelevant, given that I never claimed that my posts aren't my posts,
Deco. Of course, your posts are your posts, Deco. So are your
cross-posts, Deco. Next tautology.

15458> and that truth will
15458> not change regardless of the amount of illogic and blanket
denials that
15458> you throw up into air.

Classic erroneous presupposition.

15458> Your decision to blind yourself to the plainly evident truth
with
15458> "classic erroneous presuppositions" and blanket denials isn't
my
15458> problem, Tholen.

Classic erroneous presupposition. Your reading comprehension problem
is your problem, Deco.

15458> I've presented the evidence:

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Still suffering from
reading comprehension problems, Deco?

15458> Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahah

What does your amusement with your reading comprehension problem have
to do with OS/2, Deco?

15458> All carefully sorted, cataloged, indexed, and available for
future
15458> reference, no doubt.

If that's your description for Google's archiving, Deco, so be it.

15458> Only you, Tholen, could make such an absurd leap
15458> from your post counting to believing that it somehow indicates
I'm
15458> forced.

Classic erroneous presupposition. You clearly haven't comprehended
the nature of an obsession like yours, Deco.

15458> I can assure you, Tholen, my posts are all quite voluntary.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. You clearly haven't
comprehended the nature of an obsession like yours, Deco.

15458> And then right in the same sentence you admit that you have no
evidence
15458> for your whacky claim.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Still suffering from
reading comprehension problems, Deco? There is no such admission
from me.

15458> Well done, Tholen, hahahahahahahahahahahahaha.

What does your amusement with your reading comprehension problem have
to do with OS/2, Deco?

15458> Since I've called your "single Message-ID" bluff, Tholen,

Classic erroneous presuppositions. Yep, that's plural, Deco. Your
first presupposition is that I was bluffing. Your second
presupposition
is that you've satisfied the terms, when in fact you've done no such
thing, thanks to your reading comprehension problem.

15458> it looks like you need to post all 15,000 Message-IDs now.

Classic hallucination on your part, Deco.

15458> At this point you should be asking yourself why you care so
much about
15458> what I post that you need to file *15000* Message-IDs.

Classic erroneous presupposition.

15458> Think about it.

Practice what you preach, Deco. Think about what caused you to jump
to yet another erroneous presupposition.

15458> Another 'tard lame, Tholen.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

15458> And I like that lits, it looks good in the ..sig file.

Classic ambiguity.

15459> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy

15459> :nelohT

Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?

15459> Double email

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

15459> Next lits, Tholen.

Classic ambiguity.

15459> You know the drill, I'm forcing you to post.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Rather ironic, coming
from someone whose obsession with me forced him to post multiple
times in response to the same posting.

15460> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy

15460> :nelohT

Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?

15460> Double email

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

15460> 2,700 words of lamery

Interesting that your regard your quoted text as "lamery", Deco.

15460> that you posted separately to three different
15460> newsgroups, Tholen.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

15461> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy

15461> I really like how he claims that other people are responsible
for his
15461> posts,

Classic erroneous presupposition.

15461> it's my all-time favorite Tholen|nelohT lame excuse.

Who is "Tholen|nelohT", Deco? There is nobody in this newsgroup using
that alias.

15462> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy

15462> :nelohT

Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?

15462> Double email

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

15462> I see that you are still incapable of wrapping text correctly,
Tholen.

Classic hallucination on your part, Deco.

15462> Teh Way of Teh Tholen|nelohT:

Who is "Tholen|nelohT", Deco? There is nobody in this newsgroup using
that alias.

15462> * lie
15462> * deny
15462> * IKYABWAI
15462> * grammar/typo pounce
15462> * 'tard lame
15462> * "you did it too"
15462> * snip-n-run

Boilerplate spam from Art Deco, demonstrating that he still doesn't
understand what a signature is for. How hypocritical of him,
considering his own remarks:

"Oh lookie, my boilerplate spam from the Davie Files is now
up to 80 lines."
--Art Deco

"I order you to add this quote to your boilerplate spam."
--Art Deco

"Out-of-context quotes in your boilerplate spam, Davie,
how kooky."
--Art Deco

"This was in response to your boilerplate spam that includes
out-of-context quotes by different people."
--Art Deco

"Put my words into your boilerplate screed, Tholen, without
your selective, out-of-context quoting. I dare you."
--Art Deco

"Just more of your boilerplate screed, without meaning."
--Art Deco

"Along with his spamming of his boilerplate screeds"
--Art Deco

"Classic control issues on your part, given that you are
powerless to stop me from doing as I please, other than
repeated whining via your boilerplate screed. No surprise
here, really."
--Art Deco

Deco is still operating under the delusion that his family name is
Deco:

Message-ID: <290720060819346837%erfc@netcabal.com>

"Apparently in Tholen World, everyone is supposed to refer to
everyone else solely by their family name, anything else is
verboten."
--Art Deco

Message-ID: <050820060758108935%erfc@netcabal.com>

"My personal favorite is how he demands that everyone refer to
him as 'tholen@antispam.ham', yet when he quotes others, he
hacks everything off except what he figures is the family name."
--Art Deco

Message-ID: <240220070923413658%erfc@caballista.org>

"One last note about the holy digestor -- as it is a reflection
of Davey's bizarre world where everyone must be referred to only
by their family name"
--Art Deco

Message-ID: <120420071251145347%erfc@caballista.org>

"This behavior can be explained by Davie's apparent belief that
all should be referenced by their family name alone and nothing
else."
--Art Deco

Message-ID: <090520071324119553%erfc@caballista.org>

"As for why he thinks people should only use family names, I
have no idea."
--Art Deco

Caught in a rather obvious lie, Deco has now started backpedalling:

Message-ID: <300720071940133793%erfc@caballista.org>

"It is plainly evident to anyone with a pair of neurons that
you use either the family name or some other form of shorthand
to form the labels for your oh-so-important count categories."
--Art Deco

Classic inconsistency; first "only", now "either...or".

But consider the implication: Deco doesn't have a pair of neurons,
and that's according to Deco himself.

I see that you evaded the evidence for your psychic usenet astrology,
Deco. No surprise there, really.

Did you finally figure out what your earlier posting had to do with
demon.local, Deco? You did, after all, add the newsgroup to the
distribution and then ask what your posting had to do with that
newsgroup.

I see that you completely evaded the matter of your cross-posting to
irrelevant newsgroups, Deco. No surprise there, really.

"Not one of which was posted to rec.music.classical, yet you felt
it
necessary to spew your off-topic regurgitation into an irrelevant
newsgroup anyway."
--Art Deco

How ironic.

What does your ongoing "kookdance" have to do with the irrelevant
newsgroups to which you cross-post, Deco? Not that I'm really
expecting an answer from you, Deco.

"Another tedious load of Tholen Lames (forwarded to rsbc so the
regulars can see the deleterious effects of many years of close
exposure to the Holy Digestor.
--Art Deco

"Oh look, the digests have infected rec.sport.basketball.college."
--Art Deco

Courtesy of you, Deco.

"Tread carefully, Tholen, 'Archie Leach' is another
one of my sockpuppets."
--Art Deco

"Archie Leach wrote:
WAY TO GO, HAGAR!!! WE KNOW YOU TRIED YOUR DAMNDEST!!!"
--Art Deco

So, Deco is responding to one of his sockpuppets. Seek professional
help, Deco.

"I don't read dictionaries, tholen."
--Art Deco

No wonder you misuse and misspell so many words, Deco, but it's up to
you if you want to look like a fool.

"Why do you keep spamming this quote over and over, Tholen?
I did not write it."
--Art Deco

Further evidence of your reading comprehension problem, Deco, given
that I clearly stated that I never said that you wrote the quote.
Rather, I said that Art Deco wrote the quote, Deco, and that's because
Art Deco did write the quote, as evidenced by the message ID that I
provided the first time you made the accusation.

"Or perhaps your pathetic Holy Digestor FORTRAN code can't handle a
five-digit total?"
--Art Deco

Further evidence of your counting problem, Deco, given that your
posting
total hadn't reached five digits at the time of your question. Also
further evidence of your reading comprehension problem, Deco, given
that
the combined total from all posters was correctly reported to five
digits
over three years ago.

"So ham, do you think 'deco' can make it to four-figures in a
single
'year'?"
--Art Deco

Further evidence of your counting problem, Deco, given that Deco made
it to four figures in a single year for three years running.

"the FNVW is also my sockpuppet."
--Art Deco

"Everything I type is a lie."
--Art Deco

"Who is 'Art Deco', Tholen?"
--Art Deco

"You really are one of the litsiest people I know, Mr. Deco."
--Kali

"It's Time for Art Deco to Remove Itself From Usenet Altogether."
--Richard Head

"Deco, he's showing the world what a lame **** you really are."
--Hagar

"Deco, you sick obsessed freak. Get help."
--Miguel

"Get a life, Deco."
--Miguel

"Actually, I haven't a clue"
--Art Deco

"I don't need a memory"
--Art Deco

Don't bother auditioning for "The Wizard of Oz", Deco.

"To which newsgroups have I followed you around?"
--Art Deco

"I monitor your personal sandbox"
--Art Deco

Having trouble remembering to which newsgroups you've followed me,
Deco? Oh that's right. You don't need a memory.

"True that, but he apparently just lost his wife of many years,
and I no longer feel comfortable poking him."
--Art Deco

So, you admit to poking people, Deco, and you're comfortable doing so
under normal circumstances. Seek professional help, Deco.

"[massive sneckage]"
--Art Deco

"You removed the context"
--Art Deco

Classic hypocrisy.

"99.9% of the traffic in cooa consists of your digests and
people replying to them"
--Art Deco

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Rather, most of the
traffic in cooa consists of people responding to you, Deco, after
you've added the newsgroup to the distribution, and then the ongoing
follow-up to those articles. In other words, you're responsible for
most of the traffic in cooa, Deco.

"...which have nothing to do with the topic of the groups you
multi-post them into."
--Art Deco, who cross-posts to newsgroups that have nothing
to do with the topic of the groups he cross-posts them into,
including:

24hoursupport.helpdesk
alt.usage.english
alt.2600
alt.usenet.kooks
alt.alien.research alt.wee.davey.mom-a-fat-
whore
alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk
aus.general
alt.alien.visitors
aus.invest
alt.antichristnet
aus.science
alt.aratzio
cam.misc
alt.astronomy
comp.lang.fortran
alt.astronomy.art-deco
comp.os.linux.advocacy
alt.atheism
comp.os.os2.advocacy
alt.bad.clams
comp.os.os2.apps
alt.bible.prophecy
comp.os.os2.misc
alt.buzzard.rules
comp.sys.mac
alt.cascade
demon.local
alt.christnet.christianlife
gac.physics.astronomy
alt.christnet.prayer
ne.weather
alt.comedy.standup
news.groups
alt.conspriacy
rec.arts.marching.drumcorps
alt.culture.alaska rec.arts.movies.current-
films
alt.digestors.holy
rec.arts.poems
alt.fan.art-bell
rec.arts.sf.written
alt.fan.art-bell.art-deco
rec.aviation.products
alt.fan.keanu-reeves
rec.gambling.lottery
alt.fan.letter.m
rec.music.classical
alt.fan.madonna
rec.org.mensa
alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
rec.sports.basketball.college
alt.fan.states.new-jersey
rec.sports.football.college
alt.fan.states.texas
rec.woodworking
alt.fan.steveleyland
sci.archaeology
alt.flame
sci.astro
alt.****nozzles
sci.electronics.basics
alt.gothic
sci.electronics.design
alt.hackers.malicious
sci.geo.earthquakes
alt.home.repair
sci.geo.geology
alt.languages.french
sci.math
alt.messianic
sci.med.cardiology
alt.music.michael-jackson
sci.philosophy.tech
alt.music.white-power
sci.physics
alt.non.sequitur sci.physics.cond-
matter
alt.os.windows-xp
sci.physics.relativity
alt.paranet.ufo
sci.psychology.psychotherapy
alt.paranormal.crop-circles
sci.skeptic
alt.psychology.help
sci.space.history
alt.religion.christian
sci.space.policy
alt.religion.islam
soc.culture.israel
alt.religion.kibology
soc.culture.jewish
alt.revisionism
soc.men
alt.sailing.asa
soc.singles
alt.satellite.tv.europe soc.subculture.bondage-
bdsm
alt.sci.physics.new-theories
talk.politics.misc
alt.security.alarms
triangle.general
alt.snuh uk.food
+drink.misc
alt.society.liberalism uk.media.radio.bbc-
r4
alt.spirituality.radical-faerie
uk.sci.astronomy
alt.troll

================================================== ==============================

"A [Temporary] Dog" writes:

19> Newsgroups:
rec.sport.basketball.college,alt.usenet.kooks,news .admin.net-
abuse.usenet

19> [....]

19> They have a gift; they have a calling, and they laugh about having
19> reduced you to the level of a bot.

20> Newsgroups:
rec.sport.basketball.college,alt.usenet.kooks,news .admin.net-
abuse.usenet

20> Rather then displaying your ignorance, Dr Robotnic
20> , you could take five minutes and cure it:

20> Or you could continue to look like a fool.

20> Even the slowest of children pick up on the concept of nicknames,
Dr
20> Robotnic , but I can see you're extra
special.

21> Newsgroups:
rec.sport.basketball.college,alt.usenet.kooks,news .admin.net-
abuse.usenet

21> Does that metaphor make a whoosing sound as it flys over your
pointy
21> little head, Dr Robotnic?

21> Unmarked sneckage restored:

21> Not erroneous at all, Dr Robotnic. Rather
then
21> click on a single Wikipedia link, you are choosing to remain
ignorant
21> and that is the fools choice.

21> What problems would those be, Dr Robotnic?
Would
21> it help your comprehension problems if I put together a list of
your
21> nicknames, similar to the list we used to have for the late,
lamented
21> Joself Bartlo?

22> Newsgroups:
rec.sport.basketball.college,rec.music.classical,a lt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy,alt.religion. kibology

22> So hows that Google account working out for you, Dr
22> Robotnik?

What does that have to do with OS/2, Dog?

:nelohT

>15458> those 23 kbytes of lames are your words, not mine.
>
>Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Still suffering from
>reading comprehension problems, Deco?

Not one of those words was preceded by a number and a > at the start of
the line in which they appear.

Ergo they were typed by you.
>
>15458> I'll go ahead and assume that you won't be posting any Message-
>IDs to
>15458> back up your latest desperate attempt to hide your obvious
>tracks.
>
>Classic erroneous presupposition.

Still no message IDs from Tholen indicating that I ever claimed to be
forced to post by anyone.
>
>15458> Sure thing, Tholen, here it is:
>
>Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Still suffering from
>reading comprehension problems, Deco? There is no claim from me in
>the text that you quoted stating that I'm being forced to post by you.

"Courtesy of you, Deco."

>There is, however, text that notes the fact that you started
>cross-posting your replies to rec.sport.basketball.college, even
>though the articles to which you were replying weren't posted there
>in the first place. Among your replies that you started cross-posting
>to rec.sport.basketball.college were replies to digests,

This is correct, I did cross-post *replies* to your frothy digests. It
produced a huge chain of Tholen cascades cross-posted all across
usenet. Most entertaining.

>thus you were
>responsible for infecting rec.sport.basketball.college with the
>digests.

So the current Tholen excuse is revealed -- as long as he replies to
another reply, his hands are clean. After all, he "did not choose the
newsgroup distribution."

Let's check to see how honest Tholen is. Here is today's r.m.c version
of the multi-posted digest:

>From: "tholen@antispam.ham"
>Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.college
>Subject: Re: digest, volume 2454689
>Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 12:55:03 -0700 (PDT)
>Organization: http://groups.google.com
>Lines: 725
>Message-ID:
><2e43de48-2949-40cd-972b-ba190906e52e@l33g2000pri.googlegroups.com>
>References: <040820081854435649%wgh@neff.c0m>
>
> <050820081828325526%erfc-1024@usa.net>
>
> <090820081800064045%erfc-1024@usa.net>

The date is today, and the newsgroup is rec.sport.basketball.college.
Opening the last link in the References chain, one finds:

>Subject: Re: digest, volume 2454688
>Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2008 18:00:06 -0600
>From: Art Deco
>Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
>Message-ID: <090820081800064045%erfc-1024@usa.net>

Oh look, Tholen replied to a post in cooa, and decided that his reply
needed to be seen by the folks in rsbc. So much for his standard lame
excuse about not choosing "newsgroup distribution." So much for his
line that I'm responsible for his posts to rsbc.

>How you somehow managed to twist that into some claim that I'm being
>forced to post by you demonstrates just how twisted your mind has
>become,
>Deco.

Another of your famous 'tard lames, Tholen.
>
>demon.local is also infested with the digests, Deco, courtesy of you.
>Take, for example, Message-ID <070620081604116672%erfc-1024@usa.net>,
>which is "digest, volume 2454618" and appears in demon.local, but I
>didn't put it there, Deco. You did.

Yeah, I cross-posted my reply to demon.local. Big deal, so sue me.

You are also in error here, Tholen, the subject header is actually
"Subject: Re: digest, volume 2454618". I won't accuse you of
dishonestly leaving the "Re:" part out on purpose.
>
>Cue the spin doctoring by Deco.

Not necessary, as you do exactly same into rec.sport.basketball.college
and rec.music.classical.
>
>15458> Repeated over and over and over again, you state that I'm
>responsible
>15458> for the posts you send.
>
>Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Still suffering from
>reading comprehension problems, Deco?

"Courtesy of you, Deco."
>
>15458> Yet they are your posts,
>
>Irrelevant, given that I never claimed that my posts aren't my posts,
>Deco. Of course, your posts are your posts, Deco. So are your
>cross-posts, Deco. Next tautology.

As are your multi-posts that are replies to messages in other
newsgroups.

Nice rant though, Tholen. It's been awhile since you've generated one
so frothy. I also was greatly amused when you let your pants down and
finally admitted the existence of the enemies and antagonists files.
How many years do they go back? 1989?

--
Teh Way of Teh Tholen|nelohT:

* lie
* deny
* IKYABWAI
* grammar/typo pounce
* 'tard lame
* "you did it too"
* snip-n-run

:nelohT Double email, in rec.music.classical

>alias # today total year 5 year 4 year 3 year 2
>year 1
>-------------- ------- ----- ------ ------ ------ ------
>------
>deco 5 523 3989 4393 3722
>2268 0

Litsed again, thanks, Tholen.

--
Teh Way of Teh Tholen|nelohT:

* lie
* deny
* IKYABWAI
* grammar/typo pounce
* 'tard lame
* "you did it too"
* snip-n-run

:nelohT Double email

>-- Art Deco writes: Still suffering from attribution
>problems, Deco? Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>Classic erroneous presupposition. Classic unsubstantiated
>and erroneous claim. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous
>claim.Still suffering from reading comprehension problems,
>Deco? Classic erroneous presupposition. Classic
>unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.Still suffering from
>reading comprehension problems, Deco?There is no claim from
>me in the text that you quoted stating that I'm being forced
>to post by you. There is, however, text that notes the fact
>that you started cross-posting your replies to
>rec.sport.basketball.college, even though the articles to
>which you were replying weren't posted there in the first
>place.Among your replies that you started cross-posting to
>rec.sport.basketball.college were replies to digests, thus
>you were responsible for infecting
>rec.sport.basketball.college with the digests. How you
>somehow managed to twist that into some claim that I'm being
>forced to post by you demonstrates just how twisted your
>mind has become, Deco. demon.local is also infested with the
>digests, Deco, courtesy of you. Take, for example,
>Message-ID <070620081604116672%erfc-1024@usa.net>, which is
>"digest, volume 2454618" and appears in demon.local, but I
>didn't put it there, Deco.You did. Cue the spin doctoring by
>Deco. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.Still
>suffering from reading comprehension problems, Deco?
>Irrelevant, given that I never claimed that my posts aren't
>my posts, Deco.Of course, your posts are your posts, Deco.So
>are your cross-posts, Deco.Next tautology. Classic erroneous
>presupposition. Classic erroneous presupposition.Your
>reading comprehension problem is your problem, Deco. Classic
>unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.Still suffering from
>reading comprehension problems, Deco? What does your
>amusement with your reading comprehension problem have to do
>with OS/2, Deco? If that's your description for Google's
>archiving, Deco, so be it. Classic erroneous
>presupposition.You clearly haven't comprehended the nature
>of an obsession like yours, Deco. Classic unsubstantiated
>and erroneous claim.You clearly haven't comprehended the
>nature of an obsession like yours, Deco. Classic
>unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.Still suffering from
>reading comprehension problems, Deco?There is no such
>admission from me. What does your amusement with your
>reading comprehension problem have to do with OS/2, Deco?
>Classic erroneous presuppositions.Yep, that's plural,
>Deco.Your first presupposition is that I was bluffing.Your
>second presupposition is that you've satisfied the terms,
>when in fact you've done no such thing, thanks to your
>reading comprehension problem. Classic hallucination on your
>part, Deco. Classic erroneous presupposition. Practice what
>you preach, Deco.Think about what caused you to jump to yet
>another erroneous presupposition. Classic unsubstantiated
>and erroneous claim. Classic ambiguity. Still suffering from
>attribution problems, Deco? Classic unsubstantiated and
>erroneous claim. Classic ambiguity. Classic unsubstantiated
>and erroneous claim.Rather ironic, coming from someone whose
>obsession with me forced him to post multiple times in
>response to the same posting. Still suffering from
>attribution problems, Deco? Classic unsubstantiated and
>erroneous claim. Interesting that your regard your quoted
>text as "lamery", Deco. Classic unsubstantiated and
>erroneous claim. Classic erroneous presupposition. Who is
>"Tholen|nelohT", Deco?There is nobody in this newsgroup
>using that alias. Still suffering from attribution problems,
>Deco? Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Classic
>hallucination on your part, Deco. Who is "Tholen|nelohT",
>Deco?There is nobody in this newsgroup using that alias.
>Boilerplate spam from Art Deco, demonstrating that he still
>doesn't understand what a signature is for.How hypocritical
>of him, considering his own remarks: Deco is still operating
>under the delusion that his family name is Deco: Caught in a
>rather obvious lie, Deco has now started backpedalling:
>Classic inconsistency; first "only", now "either...or". But
>consider the implicationeco doesn't have a pair of
>neurons, and that's according to Deco himself. I see that
>you evaded the evidence for your psychic usenet astrology,
>Deco.No surprise there, really. Did you finally figure out
>what your earlier posting had to do with demon.local,
>Deco?You did, after all, add the newsgroup to the
>distribution and then ask what your posting had to do with
>that newsgroup. I see that you completely evaded the matter
>of your cross-posting to irrelevant newsgroups, Deco.No
>surprise there, really. How ironic. What does your ongoing
>"kookdance" have to do with the irrelevant newsgroups to
>which you cross-post, Deco?Not that I'm really expecting an
>answer from you, Deco. Courtesy of you, Deco. So, Deco is
>responding to one of his sockpuppets.Seek professional help,
>Deco. No wonder you misuse and misspell so many words, Deco,
>but it's up to you if you want to look like a fool. Further
>evidence of your reading comprehension problem, Deco, given
>that I clearly stated that I never said that you wrote the
>quote. Rather, I said that Art Deco wrote the quote, Deco,
>and that's because Art Deco did write the quote, as
>evidenced by the message ID that I provided the first time
>you made the accusation. Further evidence of your counting
>problem, Deco, given that your posting total hadn't reached
>five digits at the time of your question.Also further
>evidence of your reading comprehension problem, Deco, given
>that the combined total from all posters was correctly
>reported to five digits over three years ago. Further
>evidence of your counting problem, Deco, given that Deco
>made it to four figures in a single year for three years
>running. Don't bother auditioning for "The Wizard of Oz",
>Deco. Having trouble remembering to which newsgroups you've
>followed me, Deco?Oh that's right.You don't need a memory.
>So, you admit to poking people, Deco, and you're comfortable
>doing so under normal circumstances.Seek professional help,
>Deco. Classic hypocrisy. Classic unsubstantiated and
>erroneous claim.Rather, most of the traffic in cooa consists
>of people responding to you, Deco, after you've added the
>newsgroup to the distribution, and then the ongoing
>follow-up to those articles.In other words, you're
>responsible for most of the traffic in cooa, Deco.
>24hoursupport.helpdesk alt.usage.english alt.2600
>alt.usenet.kooks alt.alien.researchalt.wee.davey.mom-a-fat-
>whore alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk aus.general
>alt.alien.visitors aus.invest alt.antichristnet aus.science
>alt.aratzio cam.misc alt.astronomy comp.lang.fortran
>alt.astronomy.art-deco comp.os.linux.advocacy alt.atheism
>comp.os.os2.advocacy alt.bad.clams comp.os.os2.apps
>alt.bible.prophecy comp.os.os2.misc alt.buzzard.rules
>comp.sys.mac alt.cascade demon.local
>alt.christnet.christianlife gac.physics.astronomy
>alt.christnet.prayer ne.weather alt.comedy.standup
>news.groups alt.conspriacy rec.arts.marching.drumcorps
>alt.culture.alaskarec.arts.movies.current- films
>alt.digestors.holy rec.arts.poems alt.fan.art-bell
>rec.arts.sf.written alt.fan.art-bell.art-deco
>rec.aviation.products alt.fan.keanu-reeves
>rec.gambling.lottery alt.fan.letter.m rec.music.classical
>alt.fan.madonna rec.org.mensa alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
>rec.sports.basketball.college alt.fan.states.new-jersey
>rec.sports.football.college alt.fan.states.texas
>rec.woodworking alt.fan.steveleyland sci.archaeology
>alt.flame sci.astro alt.****nozzles sci.electronics.basics
>alt.gothic sci.electronics.design alt.hackers.malicious
>sci.geo.earthquakes alt.home.repair sci.geo.geology
>alt.languages.french sci.math alt.messianic
>sci.med.cardiology alt.music.michael-jackson
>sci.philosophy.tech alt.music.white-power sci.physics
>alt.non.sequitur sci.physics.cond- matter alt.os.windows-xp
>sci.physics.relativity alt.paranet.ufo
>sci.psychology.psychotherapy alt.paranormal.crop-circles
>sci.skeptic alt.psychology.help sci.space.history
>alt.religion.christian sci.space.policy alt.religion.islam
>soc.culture.israel alt.religion.kibology soc.culture.jewish
>alt.revisionism soc.men alt.sailing.asa soc.singles
>alt.satellite.tv.europe soc.subculture.bondage- bdsm
>alt.sci.physics.new-theories talk.politics.misc
>alt.security.alarms triangle.general alt.snuhuk.food
>+drink.misc alt.society.liberalismuk.media.radio.bbc- r4
>alt.spirituality.radical-faerie uk.sci.astronomy alt.troll
>"A [Temporary] Dog" writes:
>What does that have to do with OS/2, Dog? -- Art Deco
>writes: Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Classic
>erroneous presupposition. Classic unsubstantiated and
>erroneous claim. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous
>claim.Still suffering from reading comprehension problems,
>Deco? Classic erroneous presupposition. Classic
>unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.Still suffering from
>reading comprehension problems, Deco?There is no claim from
>me in the text that you quoted stating that I'm being forced
>to post by you. There is, however, text that notes the fact
>that you started cross-posting your replies to
>rec.sport.basketball.college, even though the articles to
>which you were replying weren't posted there in the first
>place.Among your replies that you started cross-posting to
>rec.sport.basketball.college were replies to digests, thus
>you were responsible for infecting
>rec.sport.basketball.college with the digests. How you
>somehow managed to twist that into some claim that I'm being
>forced to post by you demonstrates just how twisted your
>mind has become, Deco. demon.local is also infested with the
>digests, Deco, courtesy of you. Take, for example,
>Message-ID <070620081604116672%erfc-1024@usa.net>, which is
>"digest, volume 2454618" and appears in demon.local, but I
>didn't put it there, Deco.You did. Cue the spin doctoring by
>Deco. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.Still
>suffering from reading comprehension problems, Deco?
>Irrelevant, given that I never claimed that my posts aren't
>my posts, Deco.Of course, your posts are your posts, Deco.So
>are your cross-posts, Deco.Next tautology. Classic erroneous
>presupposition. Classic erroneous presupposition.Your
>reading comprehension problem is your problem, Deco. Classic
>unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.Still suffering from
>reading comprehension problems, Deco? What does your
>amusement with your reading comprehension problem have to do
>with OS/2, Deco? If that's your description for Google's
>archiving, Deco, so be it. Classic erroneous
>presupposition.You clearly haven't comprehended the nature
>of an obsession like yours, Deco. Classic unsubstantiated
>and erroneous claim.You clearly haven't comprehended the
>nature of an obsession like yours, Deco. Classic
>unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.Still suffering from
>reading comprehension problems, Deco?There is no such
>admission from me. What does your amusement with your
>reading comprehension problem have to do with OS/2, Deco?
>Classic erroneous presuppositions.Yep, that's plural,
>Deco.Your first presupposition is that I was bluffing.Your
>second presupposition is that you've satisfied the terms,
>when in fact you've done no such thing, thanks to your
>reading comprehension problem. Classic hallucination on your
>part, Deco. Classic erroneous presupposition. Practice what
>you preach, Deco.Think about what caused you to jump to yet
>another erroneous presupposition. Classic unsubstantiated
>and erroneous claim. Classic ambiguity. Still suffering from
>attribution problems, Deco? Classic unsubstantiated and
>erroneous claim. Classic ambiguity. Classic unsubstantiated
>and erroneous claim.Rather ironic, coming from someone whose
>obsession with me forced him to post multiple times in
>response to the same posting. Still suffering from
>attribution problems, Deco? Classic unsubstantiated and
>erroneous claim. Interesting that your regard your quoted
>text as "lamery", Deco. Classic unsubstantiated and
>erroneous claim. Classic erroneous presupposition. Who is
>"Tholen|nelohT", Deco?There is nobody in this newsgroup
>using that alias. Still suffering from attribution problems,
>Deco? Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Classic
>hallucination on your part, Deco. Who is "Tholen|nelohT",
>Deco?There is nobody in this newsgroup using that alias.
>Boilerplate spam from Art Deco, demonstrating that he still
>doesn't understand what a signature is for.How hypocritical
>of him, considering his own remarks: Deco is still operating
>under the delusion that his family name is Deco: Caught in a
>rather obvious lie, Deco has now started backpedalling:
>Classic inconsistency; first "only", now "either...or". But
>consider the implicationeco doesn't have a pair of
>neurons, and that's according to Deco himself. I see that
>you evaded the evidence for your psychic usenet astrology,
>Deco.No surprise there, really. Did you finally figure out
>what your earlier posting had to do with demon.local,
>Deco?You did, after all, add the newsgroup to the
>distribution and then ask what your posting had to do with
>that newsgroup. I see that you completely evaded the matter
>of your cross-posting to irrelevant newsgroups, Deco.No
>surprise there, really. How ironic. What does your ongoing
>"kookdance" have to do with the irrelevant newsgroups to
>which you cross-post, Deco?Not that I'm really expecting an
>answer from you, Deco. Courtesy of you, Deco. So, Deco is
>responding to one of his sockpuppets.Seek professional help,
>Deco. No wonder you misuse and misspell so many words, Deco,
>but it's up to you if you want to look like a fool. Further
>evidence of your reading comprehension problem, Deco, given
>that I clearly stated that I never said that you wrote the
>quote. Rather, I said that Art Deco wrote the quote, Deco,
>and that's because Art Deco did write the quote, as
>evidenced by the message ID that I provided the first time
>you made the accusation. Further evidence of your counting
>problem, Deco, given that your posting total hadn't reached
>five digits at the time of your question.Also further
>evidence of your reading comprehension problem, Deco, given
>that the combined total from all posters was correctly
>reported to five digits over three years ago. Further
>evidence of your counting problem, Deco, given that Deco
>made it to four figures in a single year for three years
>running. Don't bother auditioning for "The Wizard of Oz",
>Deco. Having trouble remembering to which newsgroups you've
>followed me, Deco?Oh that's right.You don't need a memory.
>So, you admit to poking people, Deco, and you're comfortable
>doing so under normal circumstances.Seek professional help,
>Deco. Classic hypocrisy. Classic unsubstantiated and
>erroneous claim.Rather, most of the traffic in cooa consists
>of people responding to you, Deco, after you've added the
>newsgroup to the distribution, and then the ongoing
>follow-up to those articles.In other words, you're
>responsible for most of the traffic in cooa, Deco.
>24hoursupport.helpdesk alt.usage.english alt.2600
>alt.usenet.kooks alt.alien.researchalt.wee.davey.mom-a-fat-
>whore alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk aus.general
>alt.alien.visitors aus.invest alt.antichristnet aus.science
>alt.aratzio cam.misc alt.astronomy comp.lang.fortran
>alt.astronomy.art-deco comp.os.linux.advocacy alt.atheism
>comp.os.os2.advocacy alt.bad.clams comp.os.os2.apps
>alt.bible.prophecy comp.os.os2.misc alt.buzzard.rules
>comp.sys.mac alt.cascade demon.local
>alt.christnet.christianlife gac.physics.astronomy
>alt.christnet.prayer ne.weather alt.comedy.standup
>news.groups alt.conspriacy rec.arts.marching.drumcorps
>alt.culture.alaskarec.arts.movies.current- films
>alt.digestors.holy rec.arts.poems alt.fan.art-bell
>rec.arts.sf.written alt.fan.art-bell.art-deco
>rec.aviation.products alt.fan.keanu-reeves
>rec.gambling.lottery alt.fan.letter.m rec.music.classical
>alt.fan.madonna rec.org.mensa alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
>rec.sports.basketball.college alt.fan.states.new-jersey
>rec.sports.football.college alt.fan.states.texas
>rec.woodworking alt.fan.steveleyland sci.archaeology
>alt.flame sci.astro alt.****nozzles sci.electronics.basics
>alt.gothic sci.electronics.design alt.hackers.malicious
>sci.geo.earthquakes alt.home.repair sci.geo.geology
>alt.languages.french sci.math alt.messianic
>sci.med.cardiology alt.music.michael-jackson
>sci.philosophy.tech alt.music.white-power sci.physics
>alt.non.sequitur sci.physics.cond- matter alt.os.windows-xp
>sci.physics.relativity alt.paranet.ufo
>sci.psychology.psychotherapy alt.paranormal.crop-circles
>sci.skeptic alt.psychology.help sci.space.history
>alt.religion.christian sci.space.policy alt.religion.islam
>soc.culture.israel alt.religion.kibology soc.culture.jewish
>alt.revisionism soc.men alt.sailing.asa soc.singles
>alt.satellite.tv.europe soc.subculture.bondage- bdsm
>alt.sci.physics.new-theories talk.politics.misc
>alt.security.alarms triangle.general alt.snuhuk.food
>+drink.misc alt.society.liberalismuk.media.radio.bbc- r4
>alt.spirituality.radical-faerie uk.sci.astronomy alt.troll
>"A [Temporary] Dog" writes:
>What does that have to do with classical music, Dog? alias#
>todaytotalyear 5year 4year 3year 2 year 1
>-------------------------------------------------- ------
>deco 5523398943933722 2268 0 honestjohn 143 520 44590 0 0
>ah1081122 669 320 112 0 snarky 65 0 103 0 0 0 nobuyout 32
>559 5 0 0 0 homintern26 0 5 0 0 0 yardwork 19 0 0 0 0 0 goat
>15 0 3 0 0 0 meow 14 0 1 1 4 0 demon10 06011 0 0
>bisectional64333 154 377 0 dog44 5 0 0 0 0 smart 3 0 0 0 0 0
>harding 2 3 1 0 0 0 pinku 1 4 024 2 0 plastic 1 0 0 0 0 0
>pluto 144 8 0 0 0 riffuceus 1 0 0 0 0 0
>-------------------------- ----- ----- ----------- ------
>189974 11744 11359 11687 9100 10033 -- Art Deco writes:
>Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? Classic
>unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Classic erroneous
>presupposition. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.Still suffering
>from reading comprehension problems, Deco? Classic erroneous
>presupposition. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous
>claim.Still suffering from reading comprehension problems,
>Deco?There is no claim from me in the text that you quoted
>stating that I'm being forced to post by you. There is,
>however, text that notes the fact that you started
>cross-posting your replies to rec.sport.basketball.college,
>even though the articles to which you were replying weren't
>posted there in the first place.Among your replies that you
>started cross-posting to rec.sport.basketball.college were
>replies to digests, thus you were responsible for infecting
>rec.sport.basketball.college with the digests. How you
>somehow managed to twist that into some claim that I'm being
>forced to post by you demonstrates just how twisted your
>mind has become, Deco. demon.local is also infested with the
>digests, Deco, courtesy of you. Take, for example,
>Message-ID <070620081604116672%erfc-1024@usa.net>, which is
>"digest, volume 2454618" and appears in demon.local, but I
>didn't put it there, Deco.You did. Cue the spin doctoring by
>Deco. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.Still
>suffering from reading comprehension problems, Deco?
>Irrelevant, given that I never claimed that my posts aren't
>my posts, Deco.Of course, your posts are your posts, Deco.So
>are your cross-posts, Deco.Next tautology. Classic erroneous
>presupposition. Classic erroneous presupposition.Your
>reading comprehension problem is your problem, Deco. Classic
>unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.Still suffering from
>reading comprehension problems, Deco? What does your
>amusement with your reading comprehension problem have to do
>with OS/2, Deco? If that's your description for Google's
>archiving, Deco, so be it. Classic erroneous
>presupposition.You clearly haven't comprehended the nature
>of an obsession like yours, Deco. Classic unsubstantiated
>and erroneous claim.You clearly haven't comprehended the
>nature of an obsession like yours, Deco. Classic
>unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.Still suffering from
>reading comprehension problems, Deco?There is no such
>admission from me. What does your amusement with your
>reading comprehension problem have to do with OS/2, Deco?
>Classic erroneous presuppositions.Yep, that's plural,
>Deco.Your first presupposition is that I was bluffing.Your
>second presupposition is that you've satisfied the terms,
>when in fact you've done no such thing, thanks to your
>reading comprehension problem. Classic hallucination on your
>part, Deco. Classic erroneous presupposition. Practice what
>you preach, Deco.Think about what caused you to jump to yet
>another erroneous presupposition. Classic unsubstantiated
>and erroneous claim. Classic ambiguity. Still suffering from
>attribution problems, Deco? Classic unsubstantiated and
>erroneous claim. Classic ambiguity. Classic unsubstantiated
>and erroneous claim.Rather ironic, coming from someone whose
>obsession with me forced him to post multiple times in
>response to the same posting. Still suffering from
>attribution problems, Deco? Classic unsubstantiated and
>erroneous claim. Interesting that your regard your quoted
>text as "lamery", Deco. Classic unsubstantiated and
>erroneous claim. Classic erroneous presupposition. Who is
>"Tholen|nelohT", Deco?There is nobody in this newsgroup
>using that alias. Still suffering from attribution problems,
>Deco? Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Classic
>hallucination on your part, Deco. Who is "Tholen|nelohT",
>Deco?There is nobody in this newsgroup using that alias.
>Boilerplate spam from Art Deco, demonstrating that he still
>doesn't understand what a signature is for.How hypocritical
>of him, considering his own remarks: Deco is still operating
>under the delusion that his family name is Deco: Caught in a
>rather obvious lie, Deco has now started backpedalling:
>Classic inconsistency; first "only", now "either...or". But
>consider the implicationeco doesn't have a pair of
>neurons, and that's according to Deco himself. I see that
>you evaded the evidence for your psychic usenet astrology,
>Deco.No surprise there, really. Did you finally figure out
>what your earlier posting had to do with demon.local,
>Deco?You did, after all, add the newsgroup to the
>distribution and then ask what your posting had to do with
>that newsgroup. I see that you completely evaded the matter
>of your cross-posting to irrelevant newsgroups, Deco.No
>surprise there, really. How ironic. What does your ongoing
>"kookdance" have to do with the irrelevant newsgroups to
>which you cross-post, Deco?Not that I'm really expecting an
>answer from you, Deco. Courtesy of you, Deco. So, Deco is
>responding to one of his sockpuppets.Seek professional help,
>Deco. No wonder you misuse and misspell so many words, Deco,
>but it's up to you if you want to look like a fool. Further
>evidence of your reading comprehension problem, Deco, given
>that I clearly stated that I never said that you wrote the
>quote. Rather, I said that Art Deco wrote the quote, Deco,
>and that's because Art Deco did write the quote, as
>evidenced by the message ID that I provided the first time
>you made the accusation. Further evidence of your counting
>problem, Deco, given that your posting total hadn't reached
>five digits at the time of your question.Also further
>evidence of your reading comprehension problem, Deco, given
>that the combined total from all posters was correctly
>reported to five digits over three years ago. Further
>evidence of your counting problem, Deco, given that Deco
>made it to four figures in a single year for three years
>running. Don't bother auditioning for "The Wizard of Oz",
>Deco. Having trouble remembering to which newsgroups you've
>followed me, Deco?Oh that's right.You don't need a memory.
>So, you admit to poking people, Deco, and you're comfortable
>doing so under normal circumstances.Seek professional help,
>Deco. Classic hypocrisy. Classic unsubstantiated and
>erroneous claim.Rather, most of the traffic in cooa consists
>of people responding to you, Deco, after you've added the
>newsgroup to the distribution, and then the ongoing
>follow-up to those articles.In other words, you're
>responsible for most of the traffic in cooa, Deco.
>24hoursupport.helpdesk alt.usage.english alt.2600
>alt.usenet.kooks alt.alien.researchalt.wee.davey.mom-a-fat-
>whore alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk aus.general
>alt.alien.visitors aus.invest alt.antichristnet aus.science
>alt.aratzio cam.misc alt.astronomy comp.lang.fortran
>alt.astronomy.art-deco comp.os.linux.advocacy alt.atheism
>comp.os.os2.advocacy alt.bad.clams comp.os.os2.apps
>alt.bible.prophecy comp.os.os2.misc alt.buzzard.rules
>comp.sys.mac alt.cascade demon.local
>alt.christnet.christianlife gac.physics.astronomy
>alt.christnet.prayer ne.weather alt.comedy.standup
>news.groups alt.conspriacy rec.arts.marching.drumcorps
>alt.culture.alaskarec.arts.movies.current- films
>alt.digestors.holy rec.arts.poems alt.fan.art-bell
>rec.arts.sf.written alt.fan.art-bell.art-deco
>rec.aviation.products alt.fan.keanu-reeves
>rec.gambling.lottery alt.fan.letter.m rec.music.classical
>alt.fan.madonna rec.org.mensa alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
>rec.sports.basketball.college alt.fan.states.new-jersey
>rec.sports.football.college alt.fan.states.texas
>rec.woodworking alt.fan.steveleyland sci.archaeology
>alt.flame sci.astro alt.****nozzles sci.electronics.basics
>alt.gothic sci.electronics.design alt.hackers.malicious
>sci.geo.earthquakes alt.home.repair sci.geo.geology
>alt.languages.french sci.math alt.messianic
>sci.med.cardiology alt.music.michael-jackson
>sci.philosophy.tech alt.music.white-power sci.physics
>alt.non.sequitur sci.physics.cond- matter alt.os.windows-xp
>sci.physics.relativity alt.paranet.ufo
>sci.psychology.psychotherapy alt.paranormal.crop-circles
>sci.skeptic alt.psychology.help sci.space.history
>alt.religion.christian sci.space.policy alt.religion.islam
>soc.culture.israel alt.religion.kibology soc.culture.jewish
>alt.revisionism soc.men alt.sailing.asa soc.singles
>alt.satellite.tv.europe soc.subculture.bondage- bdsm
>alt.sci.physics.new-theories talk.politics.misc
>alt.security.alarms triangle.general alt.snuhuk.food
>+drink.misc alt.society.liberalismuk.media.radio.bbc- r4
>alt.spirituality.radical-faerie uk.sci.astronomy alt.troll
>"A [Temporary] Dog" writes:
>What does that have to do with college basketball, Dog? Marc
>Bissonnette writes: What does
>that have to do with college basketball, Bissonnette? Pluto
>writes: What does your speculation have to do with college
>basketball, Pluto? Porsche Monkey For Life writes: What does
>that have to do with college basketball, Porsche?
>WindsorFox writes: What does
>your question have to do with college basketball, Windsor?

27 kbytes of Tholen lames, including 87 instances of "Classic" Tholen
lames, not one word of which was preceded by a number and a > at the
start of a line (the Tholen quoting style), and posted separately to
three different newsgroups.

--
Teh Way of Teh Tholen|nelohT:

* lie
* deny
* IKYABWAI
* grammar/typo pounce
* 'tard lame
* "you did it too"
* snip-n-run

:nelohT Double email

>15459> You know the drill, I'm forcing you to post.
>
>Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Rather ironic, coming
>from someone whose obsession with me forced him to post multiple
>times in response to the same posting.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Rather ironic, coming
from someone whose obsession with me forced him to post multiple times
in response to the same posting.

>15460> 2,700 words of lamery
>
>Interesting that your regard your quoted text as "lamery", Deco.

Interesting that your regard your quoted text as having been typed by
someone else, Tholen.
>
>15460> that you posted separately to three different
>15460> newsgroups, Tholen.
>
>Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

That's a lie, Tholen.

--
Teh Way of Teh Tholen|nelohT:

* lie
* deny
* IKYABWAI
* grammar/typo pounce
* 'tard lame
* "you did it too"
* snip-n-run

:nelohT Double email

Tholen digest analysis results:

"classic" lames -- 92
medical/mental lames -- 71
IKYABWAI lames -- 27
grammar/typo pounces -- 3
"you did it first" -- 30
net.copping -- 35
length -- 30 kbytes

Details:

Posted to comp.os.os2.advocacy by Tholen:

>Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?

Words typed and posted to usenet by Tholen inside his latest "Re:
digest..." posts.

>That's because you don't post your "lames" that way, Deco.

Words typed and posted to usenet by Tholen inside his latest "Re:
digest..." posts.

>Illogical, given that I don't type your "lames", Deco.

Words typed and posted to usenet by Tholen inside his latest "Re:
digest..." posts.

>How ironic, coming from someone who still hasn't posted any Message-ID
>indicating that I ever claimed to be forced to post by anyone.

Words typed and posted to usenet by Tholen inside his latest "Re:
digest..." posts.

>Interesting that your regard the content of the digests, which lately
>has been mostly yours, to be "frothy", Deco. So you finally admit to
>infesting those cross-posted newsgroups with the digests, just as I
>said, Deco.

Words typed and posted to usenet by Tholen inside his latest "Re:
digest..." posts.

>Classic inappropriate description, given that the cascades were
>perpetuated by you and your kook friends, Deco. You even
>hypocritically
>claimed to hate cascades while in the process of perpetuating those
>very
>cascades, Deco.

Words typed and posted to usenet by Tholen inside his latest "Re:
digest..." posts.

>Ah, so you also admit to infesting "all across usenet" with digests,
>Deco.

Words typed and posted to usenet by Tholen inside his latest "Re:
digest..." posts.

>What does your entertainment have to do with OS/2, Deco?

Words typed and posted to usenet by Tholen inside his latest "Re:
digest..." posts.

>Classic erroneous presupposition.

Words typed and posted to usenet by Tholen inside his latest "Re:
digest..." posts.

>Meanwhile, your hands are very dirty, Deco, considering how you often
>add numerous irrelevant newsgroups to the distribution of your "lame"
>replies. You even tried to justify doing so with comp.os.os2.advocacy
>on the grounds that it was a dead newsgroup, but that justification
>can't be applied to rec.music.classical and
>rec.sport.basketball.college,
>to name just two of the newsgroups to which you've obsessively
>followed
>me, Deco. Care to try another justification, Deco?

Words typed and posted to usenet by Tholen inside his latest "Re:
digest..." posts.

>Who are you allegedly speaking for when you say "us", Deco?

Words typed and posted to usenet by Tholen inside his latest "Re:
digest..." posts.

>Classic erroneous presupposition. You unwittingly contradicted
>yourself in the span of a single sentence, Deco. Logically, if
>something is "multi-posted", then there is a single version of it
>and it would be unnecessary to specify any version. The fact that
>you saw different versions proves that they can't be multi-posted,
>Deco. Of course, such reasoning is obviously beyond your limited
>abilities, Deco.

Words typed and posted to usenet by Tholen inside his latest "Re:
digest..." posts.

>Classic ambiguity.

Words typed and posted to usenet by Tholen inside his latest "Re:
digest..." posts.

>Classic contradiction, given that you just said that the newsgroup is
>"r.m.c", Deco.

Words typed and posted to usenet by Tholen inside his latest "Re:
digest..." posts.

>One finds a posting of yours again, Deco.

Words typed and posted to usenet by Tholen inside his latest "Re:
digest..." posts.

>I could have just as easily replied to a post of yours in any of a
>hundred different newsgroups that you've infested, Deco.

Words typed and posted to usenet by Tholen inside his latest "Re:
digest..." posts.

>How ironic, coming from someone who decided that his replies needed to
>be seen by the folks in over a hundred different, irrelevant
>newsgroups.
>A partial listing of newsgroups that you've infested appears below,
>Deco.

Words typed and posted to usenet by Tholen inside his latest "Re:
digest..." posts.

>Classic erroneous presupposition.

Words typed and posted to usenet by Tholen inside his latest "Re:
digest..." posts.

>Classic erroneous presupposition. I've written no such line, Deco.
>Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, Deco?

Words typed and posted to usenet by Tholen inside his latest "Re:
digest..." posts.

>Classic erroneous presupposition.

Words typed and posted to usenet by Tholen inside his latest "Re:
digest..." posts.

>Thus the digests also infested demon.local, courtesy of you, Deco.

Words typed and posted to usenet by Tholen inside his latest "Re:
digest..." posts.

>It figures that you would try to downplay the significance of the
>evidence that other newsgroups are infested with the digests courtesy
>of you, Deco.

Words typed and posted to usenet by Tholen inside his latest "Re:
digest..." posts.

>Classic illogic.

Words typed and posted to usenet by Tholen inside his latest "Re:
digest..." posts.

>Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

Words typed and posted to usenet by Tholen inside his latest "Re:
digest..." posts.

>Classic redundancy.

Words typed and posted to usenet by Tholen inside his latest "Re:
digest..." posts.

>Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, Deco? The "Re:"
>appears on my postings as well, Deco. That's because they're replies
>to your postings, Deco.

Words typed and posted to usenet by Tholen inside his latest "Re:
digest..." posts.

>Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

Words typed and posted to usenet by Tholen inside his latest "Re:
digest..." posts.

>Classic erroneous presupposition.

Words typed and posted to usenet by Tholen inside his latest "Re:
digest..." posts.

>Classic erroneous presupposition