Re: Beware of the cunt here called Martin - OS2
This is a discussion on Re: Beware of the cunt here called Martin - OS2 ; Cause I'm a problem child, ye browbeaten carcass fit for hounds, methink
thou art a general offence, and every man should beat thee, ye
blasphemed:
> Medmänniskan ah skrev följande skiiiit i
> news:488ad7e9$0$33701$892e0abb@auth.newsreader.oct anews.com:
>
>> Cause I'm a ...
-
Re: Beware of the cunt here called Martin
Cause I'm a problem child, ye browbeaten carcass fit for hounds, methink
thou art a general offence, and every man should beat thee, ye
blasphemed:
> Medmänniskan ah skrev följande skiiiit i
> news:488ad7e9$0$33701$892e0abb@auth.newsreader.oct anews.com:
>
>> Cause I'm a problem child wrote:
>>> Medmänniskan ah skrev följande skiiiit i
>>> news:4886c488$0$33678$892e0abb@auth.newsreader.oct anews.com:
>>>
>>>> Art Deco wrote:
>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Froot Bat wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 20 May 2008 02:16:58 +0100, Simon
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Tue, 20 May 2008 00:58:03 +0000, Froot Bat
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Tue, 20 May 2008 01:50:11 +0100, Simon
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Tue, 20 May 2008 00:43:10 +0000, Froot Bat
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>No, I just don't count the voices in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>heads of
>>>>>>Altnet
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>subscribers
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>as different people.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>And I suppose you have proof that we're all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>the same
>>>>>>>>>>person?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>No, I didn't think so...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>And I suppose I need proof that you're all
> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>same
>>>>>>>>person?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>No, I didn't think so...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>If you're gonna claim that we are,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>We?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Yes, we. As in, "The nominative plural of "I"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>used to refer
>>>>>>>>to
>>>>>>>>>>>>the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>speaker and one or more other persons."
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LOL
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't know what's funnier; that you had to
> look
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> up the
>>>>>>>>>>meaning
>>>>>>>>>>>>of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "we" or that you put quotes around it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>*snicker*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>"snicker"? Are you a ten-year-old?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *snicker*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>then yes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I disagree.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Disagree as much as you like, stamp your feet
> if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>you wish
>>>>>>>>too,
>>>>>>>>>>>>you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>offered NO evidence.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, I'll leave the feet stamping to you,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> demanding "proof"
>>>>>>>>and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "evidence". I'll just continue to disagree that
> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have to
>>>>>>>>>>provide
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>So, do you have that proof or not?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>No, I didn't think so...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Do I need that proof or not?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>You're making the claim! You provide the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>evidence!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Or else?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>No, I didn't think so...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Anyway, what's your obsession with people who
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>post from
>>>>>>>>>>>>alt.net?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>How do you define "obsession"?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>A compulsive, often unreasonable idea or
> emotion.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Remarking that you are posting under more than
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one name is
>>>>>>an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> obsession? I'd call it an observation.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Every post you see in uk.media.tv.misc from an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>alt.net
>>>>>>user
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>you claim is from the same person.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Every post? You mean you and that other person
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (you)?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *snicker*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>*snicker*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *snicker*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>*snicker*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *snicker*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>*snicker*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *snicker*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>*snicker*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *snicker*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>*snicker*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *snicker*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>*snicker*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> *snicker*
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>*snicker*
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *snicker*
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>(you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>obviously check headers on all posts - another
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>obsession &
>>>>>>>>the
>>>>>>>>>>>>sign
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>netcop)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What's to check? The headers are there in plain
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sight. If
>>>>>>>>>>you're
>>>>>>>>>>>>so
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> upset or paranoid about other people seeing
> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> headers,
>>>>>>>>don't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> post.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BTW, I've cut the crosspost to five but left in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>additions
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> demon.local and altnet.general, since you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> obviously think
>>>>>>>>>>people
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are interested in your mindless, cry-baby
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ravings.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>*pops popcorn*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>*peels onions*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>*de-bones chicken*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>*rubs chicken*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>*drinks glass of tea*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>*waves stick of fat-wood*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>*slathers A-1 on the hot-dog family pack*
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>*eats half of chocolate cake before mom notices*
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>*whittles mallet*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>*has a ball*
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Come again?
>>>
>>>
>>> I be Martin is french frensh or fron france
>>
>> Vu tink fo?
>
> CAuseI'm a problemchild
Not a problem, child.
*plonk*
--
Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member: Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Official Overseer of Kooks & Trolls in 24hoursupport.helpdesk
-
Re: Beware of the cunt here called Martin
Medmänniskan "Albulidae Nicotinovorans Errones"
skrev följande
skiiiit i news:djb877$cxr$h@alt.astronomy.trashy-brown-berry.net.burma:
> Cause I'm a problem child, ye browbeaten carcass fit for hounds,
methink
> thou art a general offence, and every man should beat thee, ye
> blasphemed:
>
>> Medmänniskan ah skrev följande skiiiit i
>> news:488ad7e9$0$33701$892e0abb@auth.newsreader.oct anews.com:
>>
>>> Cause I'm a problem child wrote:
>>>> Medmänniskan ah skrev följande skiiiit i
>>>> news:4886c488$0$33678$892e0abb@auth.newsreader.oct anews.com:
>>>>
>>>>> Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Froot Bat wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 20 May 2008 02:16:58 +0100, Simon
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Tue, 20 May 2008 00:58:03 +0000, Froot Bat
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Tue, 20 May 2008 01:50:11 +0100, Simon
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Tue, 20 May 2008 00:43:10 +0000, Froot
Bat
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>No, I just don't count the voices in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>heads of
>>>>>>>Altnet
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>subscribers
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>as different people.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>And I suppose you have proof that we're
all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>the same
>>>>>>>>>>>person?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>No, I didn't think so...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>And I suppose I need proof that you're all
>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>same
>>>>>>>>>person?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>No, I didn't think so...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>If you're gonna claim that we are,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>We?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Yes, we. As in, "The nominative plural of "I"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>used to refer
>>>>>>>>>to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>speaker and one or more other persons."
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LOL
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't know what's funnier; that you had to
>> look
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> up the
>>>>>>>>>>>meaning
>>>>>>>>>>>>>of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "we" or that you put quotes around it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>*snicker*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>"snicker"? Are you a ten-year-old?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *snicker*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>then yes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I disagree.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Disagree as much as you like, stamp your feet
>> if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>you wish
>>>>>>>>>too,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>offered NO evidence.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, I'll leave the feet stamping to you,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> demanding "proof"
>>>>>>>>>and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "evidence". I'll just continue to disagree
that
>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have to
>>>>>>>>>>>provide
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>So, do you have that proof or not?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>No, I didn't think so...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Do I need that proof or not?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>You're making the claim! You provide the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>evidence!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Or else?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>No, I didn't think so...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Anyway, what's your obsession with people
who
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>post from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>alt.net?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>How do you define "obsession"?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>A compulsive, often unreasonable idea or
>> emotion.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Remarking that you are posting under more
than
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one name is
>>>>>>>an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> obsession? I'd call it an observation.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Every post you see in uk.media.tv.misc from
an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>alt.net
>>>>>>>user
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>you claim is from the same person.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Every post? You mean you and that other
person
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (you)?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *snicker*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>*snicker*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *snicker*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>*snicker*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *snicker*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>*snicker*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *snicker*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>*snicker*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *snicker*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>*snicker*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *snicker*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>*snicker*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *snicker*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>*snicker*
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *snicker*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>(you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>obviously check headers on all posts -
another
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>obsession &
>>>>>>>>>the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>sign
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>netcop)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What's to check? The headers are there in
plain
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sight. If
>>>>>>>>>>>you're
>>>>>>>>>>>>>so
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> upset or paranoid about other people seeing
>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> headers,
>>>>>>>>>don't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> post.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BTW, I've cut the crosspost to five but left
in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>additions
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> demon.local and altnet.general, since you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> obviously think
>>>>>>>>>>>people
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are interested in your mindless, cry-baby
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ravings.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>*pops popcorn*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>*peels onions*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>*de-bones chicken*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>*rubs chicken*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>*drinks glass of tea*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>*waves stick of fat-wood*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>*slathers A-1 on the hot-dog family pack*
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>*eats half of chocolate cake before mom notices*
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>*whittles mallet*
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>*has a ball*
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Come again?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I be Martin is french frensh or fron france
>>>
>>> Vu tink fo?
>>
>> CAuseI'm a problemchild
>
>
> Not a problem, child.
>
> *plonk*
>
*plink*
--
Every night
Street light
I drink my booze
Some run
Some fight
I win they lose
What I need I like
What I don't I fight
N' I don't like you
So say bye bye
-
Re: Beware of the cunt here called Martin
Cause I'm a problem child wrote:
> Medmänniskan ah skrev följande skiiiit i
> news:488ad7e9$0$33701$892e0abb@auth.newsreader.oct anews.com:
>
>> Cause I'm a problem child wrote:
>>> Medmänniskan ah skrev följande skiiiit i
>>> news:4886c488$0$33678$892e0abb@auth.newsreader.oct anews.com:
>>>
>>>> Art Deco wrote:
>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Froot Bat wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 20 May 2008 02:16:58 +0100, Simon
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Tue, 20 May 2008 00:58:03 +0000, Froot Bat
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Tue, 20 May 2008 01:50:11 +0100, Simon
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Tue, 20 May 2008 00:43:10 +0000, Froot Bat
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>No, I just don't count the voices in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>heads of
>>>>>>Altnet
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>subscribers
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>as different people.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>And I suppose you have proof that we're all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>the same
>>>>>>>>>>person?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>No, I didn't think so...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>And I suppose I need proof that you're all
> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>same
>>>>>>>>person?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>No, I didn't think so...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>If you're gonna claim that we are,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>We?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Yes, we. As in, "The nominative plural of "I"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>used to refer
>>>>>>>>to
>>>>>>>>>>>>the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>speaker and one or more other persons."
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LOL
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't know what's funnier; that you had to
> look
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> up the
>>>>>>>>>>meaning
>>>>>>>>>>>>of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "we" or that you put quotes around it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>*snicker*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>"snicker"? Are you a ten-year-old?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *snicker*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>then yes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I disagree.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Disagree as much as you like, stamp your feet
> if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>you wish
>>>>>>>>too,
>>>>>>>>>>>>you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>offered NO evidence.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, I'll leave the feet stamping to you,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> demanding "proof"
>>>>>>>>and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "evidence". I'll just continue to disagree that
> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have to
>>>>>>>>>>provide
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>So, do you have that proof or not?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>No, I didn't think so...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Do I need that proof or not?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>You're making the claim! You provide the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>evidence!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Or else?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>No, I didn't think so...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Anyway, what's your obsession with people who
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>post from
>>>>>>>>>>>>alt.net?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>How do you define "obsession"?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>A compulsive, often unreasonable idea or
> emotion.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Remarking that you are posting under more than
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one name is
>>>>>>an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> obsession? I'd call it an observation.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Every post you see in uk.media.tv.misc from an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>alt.net
>>>>>>user
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>you claim is from the same person.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Every post? You mean you and that other person
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (you)?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *snicker*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>*snicker*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *snicker*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>*snicker*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *snicker*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>*snicker*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *snicker*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>*snicker*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *snicker*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>*snicker*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *snicker*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>*snicker*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> *snicker*
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>*snicker*
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *snicker*
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>(you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>obviously check headers on all posts - another
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>obsession &
>>>>>>>>the
>>>>>>>>>>>>sign
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>netcop)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What's to check? The headers are there in plain
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sight. If
>>>>>>>>>>you're
>>>>>>>>>>>>so
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> upset or paranoid about other people seeing
> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> headers,
>>>>>>>>don't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> post.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BTW, I've cut the crosspost to five but left in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>additions
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> demon.local and altnet.general, since you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> obviously think
>>>>>>>>>>people
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are interested in your mindless, cry-baby
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ravings.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>*pops popcorn*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>*peels onions*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>*de-bones chicken*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>*rubs chicken*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>*drinks glass of tea*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>*waves stick of fat-wood*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>*slathers A-1 on the hot-dog family pack*
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>*eats half of chocolate cake before mom notices*
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>*whittles mallet*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>*has a ball*
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Come again?
>>>
>>>
>>> I be Martin is french frensh or fron france
>>
>> Vu tink fo?
>
> CAuseI'm a problemchild
PYP!
--
ah