Re: Tholen on Wikipedia. - OS2
This is a discussion on Re: Tholen on Wikipedia. - OS2 ; Art Deco wrote:
> ah wrote:
>>Art Deco wrote:
>>> ah wrote:
>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...
-
Re: Tholen on Wikipedia.
Art Deco wrote:
> ah wrote:
>>Art Deco wrote:
>>> ah wrote:
>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>tholen@antispam.ham wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah writes:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Who wrote?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Don Salad wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The claim was that "Tholen" was
>>doing
>>>>>>it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Non sequitur. At issue is the fact
>>>>that
>>>>>>>>>>there
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>more
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>than
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> person,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> identifed by name, who cared enough
>>to
>>>>>>do
>>>>>>>>>>the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>deleting,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>none
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>them
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> named "Tholen".
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Note: no response.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh, goodie! A "still no response"
>>>>cascade,
>>>>>>>>>>those
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>always
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> entertaining.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Note: no response.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Still suffering from reading
>>comprehension
>>>>>>>>>>>>problems,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>ah?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>The
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>above
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> constitutes a response.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Still suffering from reading comprehension
>>>>>>>>>>problems,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>tholen?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>The
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> above
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> constitutes a response.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Irrelevant, given that I didn't make any
>>note
>>>>>>of
>>>>>>>>a
>>>>>>>>>>>>non
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>response
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> way you did, ah.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Note: no response.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Note: tholen@antispam.ham did not take this
>>to
>>>>>>>>>>email.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>No
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> surprise,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> really.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Typical.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Where is the alleged typicality, ah?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Note: no response.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm well aware there is no response, ah. No need
>>>>to
>>>>>>>>tell
>>>>>>>>>>>>me
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>about
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>At issue is the fact that there is more than one
>>>>>>response
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>erroneously
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>noted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>as a non-response, Deco.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Where is the alleged issue of erroneously noted
>>>>>>plurality
>>>>>>>>>>of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> non-responses in repose, ah?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Classic obfuscation of the point, Deco.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic invective, as expected from someone who
>>>>allegedly
>>>>>>>>is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> non-responsive, ah.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Where is this alleged non-responsiveness, Deco?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic incentive, laced with paprika, as expected from
>>>>>>>>someone
>>>>>>>>>>>>who
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> erroneously plural.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Classic BBQ, Deco!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can smell the BBQ now, ah.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Texas vinegar, Deco!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yee-hah! Jester's dead!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Funny.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You know what a Texas deer is?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>No. Do tell.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Range cattle.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Wide, or narrow?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Them dogies with the long horns.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I et one of them, once.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The stars at night, are big and bright.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>The sheep and goats, don't sleep at night.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Run Away!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>IAWTP!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> IAWTIAWTP!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>IRTRTTOIAWTPIAWTPT.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> IBTIPAGOTAPTPWCATGCTAWTP.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>IBYFTHCIROLFAJFCWINYAWTP.
>>>>>
>>>>> IBWARAWRTTNFACSAPLWTACAWTP.
>>>>
>>>>IBYSTTATK.
>>>
>>> IATWDTIADLK.
>>
>>IBID.
>
> IAWTIBID.
IAAWTIBID.
-
Re: Tholen on Wikipedia.
"ah" wrote in message
news:46bb9a43$0$11830$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com...
> Art Deco wrote:
> > ah wrote:
> >>Art Deco wrote:
> >>> ah wrote:
> >>>>Art Deco wrote:
> >>>>> ah wrote:
> >>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
> >>>>>>> ah wrote:
> >>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>tholen@antispam.ham wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah writes:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Art Deco wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Who wrote?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Don Salad wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The claim was that "Tholen"
was
> >>doing
> >>>>>>it.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Non sequitur. At issue is
the fact
> >>>>that
> >>>>>>>>>>there
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>more
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>than
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>one
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> person,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> identifed by name, who cared
enough
> >>to
> >>>>>>do
> >>>>>>>>>>the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>deleting,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>none
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>them
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> named "Tholen".
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Note: no response.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh, goodie! A "still no
response"
> >>>>cascade,
> >>>>>>>>>>those
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>are
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>always
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> entertaining.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Note: no response.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Still suffering from reading
> >>comprehension
> >>>>>>>>>>>>problems,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>ah?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>The
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>above
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> constitutes a response.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Still suffering from reading
comprehension
> >>>>>>>>>>problems,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>tholen?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>The
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> above
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> constitutes a response.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Irrelevant, given that I didn't make
any
> >>note
> >>>>>>of
> >>>>>>>>a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>non
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>response
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> way you did, ah.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Note: no response.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Note: tholen@antispam.ham did not
take this
> >>to
> >>>>>>>>>>email.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>No
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> surprise,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> really.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Typical.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Where is the alleged typicality, ah?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Note: no response.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm well aware there is no response, ah.
No need
> >>>>to
> >>>>>>>>tell
> >>>>>>>>>>>>me
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>about
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>At issue is the fact that there is more than
one
> >>>>>>response
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>erroneously
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>noted
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>as a non-response, Deco.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Where is the alleged issue of erroneously
noted
> >>>>>>plurality
> >>>>>>>>>>of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> non-responses in repose, ah?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Classic obfuscation of the point, Deco.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic invective, as expected from someone
who
> >>>>allegedly
> >>>>>>>>is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> non-responsive, ah.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Where is this alleged non-responsiveness, Deco?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic incentive, laced with paprika, as
expected from
> >>>>>>>>someone
> >>>>>>>>>>>>who
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> erroneously plural.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Classic BBQ, Deco!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can smell the BBQ now, ah.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Texas vinegar, Deco!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yee-hah! Jester's dead!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Funny.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You know what a Texas deer is?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>No. Do tell.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Range cattle.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Wide, or narrow?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Them dogies with the long horns.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>I et one of them, once.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The stars at night, are big and bright.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>The sheep and goats, don't sleep at night.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Run Away!
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>IAWTP!
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> IAWTIAWTP!
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>IRTRTTOIAWTPIAWTPT.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> IBTIPAGOTAPTPWCATGCTAWTP.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>IBYFTHCIROLFAJFCWINYAWTP.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> IBWARAWRTTNFACSAPLWTACAWTP.
> >>>>
> >>>>IBYSTTATK.
> >>>
> >>> IATWDTIADLK.
> >>
> >>IBID.
> >
> > IAWTIBID.
>
> IAAWTIBID.
SLURP.
-
Re: Tholen on Wikipedia.
ah wrote:
>Art Deco wrote:
>> ah wrote:
>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>tholen@antispam.ham wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah writes:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Who wrote?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Don Salad wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The claim was that "Tholen" was
>>>doing
>>>>>>>it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Non sequitur. At issue is the
>fact
>>>>>that
>>>>>>>>>>>there
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>more
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>than
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> person,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> identifed by name, who cared
>enough
>>>to
>>>>>>>do
>>>>>>>>>>>the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>deleting,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>none
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>them
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> named "Tholen".
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Note: no response.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh, goodie! A "still no response"
>>>>>cascade,
>>>>>>>>>>>those
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>always
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> entertaining.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Note: no response.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Still suffering from reading
>>>comprehension
>>>>>>>>>>>>>problems,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>ah?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>The
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>above
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> constitutes a response.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Still suffering from reading
>comprehension
>>>>>>>>>>>problems,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>tholen?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>The
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> above
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> constitutes a response.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Irrelevant, given that I didn't make any
>>>note
>>>>>>>of
>>>>>>>>>a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>non
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>response
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> way you did, ah.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Note: no response.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Note: tholen@antispam.ham did not take
>this
>>>to
>>>>>>>>>>>email.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>No
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> surprise,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> really.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Typical.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Where is the alleged typicality, ah?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Note: no response.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm well aware there is no response, ah. No
>need
>>>>>to
>>>>>>>>>tell
>>>>>>>>>>>>>me
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>about
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>At issue is the fact that there is more than one
>>>>>>>response
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>erroneously
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>noted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>as a non-response, Deco.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Where is the alleged issue of erroneously noted
>>>>>>>plurality
>>>>>>>>>>>of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> non-responses in repose, ah?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Classic obfuscation of the point, Deco.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic invective, as expected from someone who
>>>>>allegedly
>>>>>>>>>is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> non-responsive, ah.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Where is this alleged non-responsiveness, Deco?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic incentive, laced with paprika, as expected
>from
>>>>>>>>>someone
>>>>>>>>>>>>>who
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> erroneously plural.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Classic BBQ, Deco!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can smell the BBQ now, ah.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Texas vinegar, Deco!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yee-hah! Jester's dead!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Funny.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You know what a Texas deer is?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>No. Do tell.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Range cattle.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Wide, or narrow?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Them dogies with the long horns.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I et one of them, once.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The stars at night, are big and bright.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>The sheep and goats, don't sleep at night.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Run Away!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>IAWTP!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> IAWTIAWTP!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>IRTRTTOIAWTPIAWTPT.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> IBTIPAGOTAPTPWCATGCTAWTP.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>IBYFTHCIROLFAJFCWINYAWTP.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> IBWARAWRTTNFACSAPLWTACAWTP.
>>>>>
>>>>>IBYSTTATK.
>>>>
>>>> IATWDTIADLK.
>>>
>>>IBID.
>>
>> IAWTIBID.
>
>IAAWTIBID.
IAAAWTIBID.
--
Official Overseer of Kooks and Saucerheads for alt.astronomy
Trainer and leash holder of:
Honest "Clockbrain" John
nightbat "fro0tbat" of alt.astronomy
Tom "TommY Crackpotter" Potter
"You really are one of the litsiest people I know, Mr. Deco."
--Kali, quoted endlessly by David Tholen as evidence of "something"
"I am claiming that you believe ah's family name is "ah",
Deco, and I substantiated that claim."
--David Tholen
"Quite a kook-out, Deco. You've been frothing even more
ever since I demonstrated how you believe that ah's family
name is "ah"."
--David Tholen
-
Re: Tholen on Wikipedia.
Art Deco wrote:
> ah wrote:
>>Art Deco wrote:
>>> ah wrote:
>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>tholen@antispam.ham wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah writes:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Who wrote?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Don Salad wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The claim was that "Tholen" was
>>>>doing
>>>>>>>>it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Non sequitur. At issue is the
>>fact
>>>>>>that
>>>>>>>>>>>>there
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>more
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>than
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> person,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> identifed by name, who cared
>>enough
>>>>to
>>>>>>>>do
>>>>>>>>>>>>the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>deleting,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>none
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>them
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> named "Tholen".
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Note: no response.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh, goodie! A "still no response"
>>>>>>cascade,
>>>>>>>>>>>>those
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>always
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> entertaining.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Note: no response.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Still suffering from reading
>>>>comprehension
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>problems,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>ah?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>The
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>above
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> constitutes a response.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Still suffering from reading
>>comprehension
>>>>>>>>>>>>problems,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>tholen?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>The
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> above
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> constitutes a response.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Irrelevant, given that I didn't make any
>>>>note
>>>>>>>>of
>>>>>>>>>>a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>non
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>response
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> way you did, ah.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Note: no response.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Note: tholen@antispam.ham did not take
>>this
>>>>to
>>>>>>>>>>>>email.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>No
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> surprise,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> really.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Typical.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Where is the alleged typicality, ah?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Note: no response.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm well aware there is no response, ah. No
>>need
>>>>>>to
>>>>>>>>>>tell
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>me
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>about
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>At issue is the fact that there is more than one
>>>>>>>>response
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>erroneously
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>noted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>as a non-response, Deco.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Where is the alleged issue of erroneously noted
>>>>>>>>plurality
>>>>>>>>>>>>of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> non-responses in repose, ah?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Classic obfuscation of the point, Deco.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic invective, as expected from someone who
>>>>>>allegedly
>>>>>>>>>>is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> non-responsive, ah.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Where is this alleged non-responsiveness, Deco?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic incentive, laced with paprika, as expected
>>from
>>>>>>>>>>someone
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>who
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> erroneously plural.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Classic BBQ, Deco!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can smell the BBQ now, ah.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Texas vinegar, Deco!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yee-hah! Jester's dead!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Funny.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You know what a Texas deer is?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>No. Do tell.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Range cattle.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Wide, or narrow?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Them dogies with the long horns.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I et one of them, once.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The stars at night, are big and bright.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>The sheep and goats, don't sleep at night.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Run Away!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>IAWTP!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> IAWTIAWTP!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>IRTRTTOIAWTPIAWTPT.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> IBTIPAGOTAPTPWCATGCTAWTP.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>IBYFTHCIROLFAJFCWINYAWTP.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> IBWARAWRTTNFACSAPLWTACAWTP.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>IBYSTTATK.
>>>>>
>>>>> IATWDTIADLK.
>>>>
>>>>IBID.
>>>
>>> IAWTIBID.
>>
>>IAAWTIBID.
>
> IAAAWTIBID.
IAAWTBASTID.
-
Re: Tholen on Wikipedia.
ah wrote:
>Art Deco wrote:
>> ah wrote:
>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>tholen@antispam.ham wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah writes:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Who wrote?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Don Salad wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The claim was that "Tholen" was
>>>>>doing
>>>>>>>>>it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Non sequitur. At issue is the
>>>fact
>>>>>>>that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>there
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>more
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>than
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> person,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> identifed by name, who cared
>>>enough
>>>>>to
>>>>>>>>>do
>>>>>>>>>>>>>the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>deleting,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>none
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>them
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> named "Tholen".
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Note: no response.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh, goodie! A "still no response"
>>>>>>>cascade,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>those
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>always
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> entertaining.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Note: no response.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Still suffering from reading
>>>>>comprehension
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>problems,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>ah?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>The
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>above
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> constitutes a response.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Still suffering from reading
>>>comprehension
>>>>>>>>>>>>>problems,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>tholen?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>The
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> above
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> constitutes a response.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Irrelevant, given that I didn't make
>any
>>>>>note
>>>>>>>>>of
>>>>>>>>>>>a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>non
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>response
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> way you did, ah.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Note: no response.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Note: tholen@antispam.ham did not take
>>>this
>>>>>to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>email.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>No
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> surprise,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> really.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Typical.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Where is the alleged typicality, ah?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Note: no response.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm well aware there is no response, ah. No
>>>need
>>>>>>>to
>>>>>>>>>>>tell
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>me
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>about
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>At issue is the fact that there is more than
>one
>>>>>>>>>response
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>erroneously
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>noted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>as a non-response, Deco.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Where is the alleged issue of erroneously noted
>>>>>>>>>plurality
>>>>>>>>>>>>>of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> non-responses in repose, ah?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Classic obfuscation of the point, Deco.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic invective, as expected from someone who
>>>>>>>allegedly
>>>>>>>>>>>is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> non-responsive, ah.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Where is this alleged non-responsiveness, Deco?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic incentive, laced with paprika, as expected
>>>from
>>>>>>>>>>>someone
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>who
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> erroneously plural.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Classic BBQ, Deco!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can smell the BBQ now, ah.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Texas vinegar, Deco!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yee-hah! Jester's dead!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Funny.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You know what a Texas deer is?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>No. Do tell.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Range cattle.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Wide, or narrow?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Them dogies with the long horns.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I et one of them, once.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The stars at night, are big and bright.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>The sheep and goats, don't sleep at night.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Run Away!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>IAWTP!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> IAWTIAWTP!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>IRTRTTOIAWTPIAWTPT.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> IBTIPAGOTAPTPWCATGCTAWTP.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>IBYFTHCIROLFAJFCWINYAWTP.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> IBWARAWRTTNFACSAPLWTACAWTP.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>IBYSTTATK.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> IATWDTIADLK.
>>>>>
>>>>>IBID.
>>>>
>>>> IAWTIBID.
>>>
>>>IAAWTIBID.
>>
>> IAAAWTIBID.
>
>IAAWTBASTID.
IAAAWTKASKADE.
--
Official Overseer of Kooks and Saucerheads for alt.astronomy
Trainer and leash holder of:
Honest "Clockbrain" John
nightbat "fro0tbat" of alt.astronomy
Tom "TommY Crackpotter" Potter
"You really are one of the litsiest people I know, Mr. Deco."
--Kali, quoted endlessly by David Tholen as evidence of "something"
"I am claiming that you believe ah's family name is "ah",
Deco, and I substantiated that claim."
--David Tholen
"Quite a kook-out, Deco. You've been frothing even more
ever since I demonstrated how you believe that ah's family
name is "ah"."
--David Tholen