Daniel Kolle writes:

> Cypherpunk@nyc.rr.com wrote:

>> Do youz like wabbits, trolen?

> Tholz is incapable of liking anything, Cypherpunk.

Who is "Tholz", Kolle? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that
alias.

:nelohT

>Daniel Kolle writes:
>
>> Cypherpunk@nyc.rr.com wrote:
>
>>> Do youz like wabbits, trolen?
>
>> Tholz is incapable of liking anything, Cypherpunk.
>
>Who is "Tholz", Kolle? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that
>alias.

Classic erroneous presupposition.

--
"Substantiation that you regard yourself as a God to be worhsipped [sic]
should be your concern, Deco."
-- David Tholen

Art Deco wrote:
> :nelohT
>
>>Daniel Kolle writes:
>>
>>> Cypherpunk@nyc.rr.com wrote:
>>
>>>> Do youz like wabbits, trolen?
>>
>>> Tholz is incapable of liking anything, Cypherpunk.
>>
>>Who is "Tholz", Kolle? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that
>>alias.
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition.

How ironic.
--
ah

Art Deco writes:

> :nelohT

Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?

>> Daniel Kolle wrote:

>>> Cypherpunk@nyc.rr.com wrote:

>>>> Do youz like wabbits, trolen?

>>> Tholz is incapable of liking anything, Cypherpunk.

>> Who is "Tholz", Kolle? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that
>> alias.

> Classic erroneous presupposition.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

ah wrote:
>Art Deco wrote:
>> :nelohT
>>
>>>Daniel Kolle writes:
>>>
>>>> Cypherpunk@nyc.rr.com wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Do youz like wabbits, trolen?
>>>
>>>> Tholz is incapable of liking anything, Cypherpunk.
>>>
>>>Who is "Tholz", Kolle? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that
>>>alias.
>>
>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>
>How ironic.

Classic pontification.

--
"Substantiation that you regard yourself as a God to be worhsipped [sic]
should be your concern, Deco."
-- David Tholen

:nelohT

>Art Deco writes:
>
>> :nelohT
>
>Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>
>>> Daniel Kolle wrote:
>
>>>> Cypherpunk@nyc.rr.com wrote:
>
>>>>> Do youz like wabbits, trolen?
>
>>>> Tholz is incapable of liking anything, Cypherpunk.
>
>>> Who is "Tholz", Kolle? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that
>>> alias.
>
>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>
>Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

Non sequitur.

--
"Substantiation that you regard yourself as a God to be worhsipped [sic]
should be your concern, Deco."
-- David Tholen

Art Deco writes:

> :nelohT

Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?

>>> :nelohT

>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?

Note: no response.

>>>> Daniel Kolle wrote:

>>>>> Cypherpunk@nyc.rr.com wrote:

>>>>>> Do youz like wabbits, trolen?

>>>>> Tholz is incapable of liking anything, Cypherpunk.

>>>> Who is "Tholz", Kolle? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that
>>>> alias.

>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.

>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

> Non sequitur.

Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

:nelohT

>Art Deco writes:
>
>> :nelohT
>
>Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>
>>>> :nelohT
>
>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>
>Note: no response.
>
>>>>> Daniel Kolle wrote:
>
>>>>>> Cypherpunk@nyc.rr.com wrote:
>
>>>>>>> Do youz like wabbits, trolen?
>
>>>>>> Tholz is incapable of liking anything, Cypherpunk.
>
>>>>> Who is "Tholz", Kolle? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that
>>>>> alias.
>
>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>
>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>> Non sequitur.
>
>Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

Illogical.

--
"Substantiation that you regard yourself as a God to be worhsipped [sic]
should be your concern, Deco."
-- David Tholen

Art Deco writes:

> :nelohT

Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?

>>> :nelohT

>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?

Note: no response.

>>>>> :nelohT

>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?

>> Note: no response.

Note: still no response.

>>>>>> Daniel Kolle wrote:

>>>>>>> Cypherpunk@nyc.rr.com wrote:

>>>>>>>> Do youz like wabbits, trolen?

>>>>>>> Tholz is incapable of liking anything, Cypherpunk.

>>>>>> Who is "Tholz", Kolle? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that
>>>>>> alias.

>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.

>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

>>> Non sequitur.

>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

> Illogical.

Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

:nelohT

>Art Deco writes:
>
>> :nelohT
>
>Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>
>>>> :nelohT
>
>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>
>Note: no response.

Response.
>
>>>>>> :nelohT
>
>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>
>>> Note: no response.
>
>Note: still no response.

Response.
>
>>>>>>> Daniel Kolle wrote:
>
>>>>>>>> Cypherpunk@nyc.rr.com wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>> Do youz like wabbits, trolen?
>
>>>>>>>> Tholz is incapable of liking anything, Cypherpunk.
>
>>>>>>> Who is "Tholz", Kolle? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that
>>>>>>> alias.
>
>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>
>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>> Non sequitur.
>
>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>> Illogical.
>
>Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

Classic erroneous presupposition.
>

--
"Substantiation that you regard yourself as a God to be worhsipped [sic]
should be your concern, Deco."
-- David Tholen

Art Deco writes:

> :nelohT

Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?

>>> :nelohT

>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?

Note: no response.

>>>>> :nelohT

>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?

>> Note: no response.

> Response.

I see that you didn't answer the question, Deco. No surprise there,
really.

>>>>>>> :nelohT

>>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?

>>>> Note: no response.

>> Note: still no response.

> Response.

I see that you didn't answer the question, Deco. No surprise there,
really.

>>>>>>>> Daniel Kolle wrote:

>>>>>>>>> Cypherpunk@nyc.rr.com wrote:

>>>>>>>>>> Do youz like wabbits, trolen?

>>>>>>>>> Tholz is incapable of liking anything, Cypherpunk.

>>>>>>>> Who is "Tholz", Kolle? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that
>>>>>>>> alias.

>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.

>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

>>>>> Non sequitur.

>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

>>> Illogical.

>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

> Classic erroneous presupposition.

Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

:nelohT

>> :nelohT
>
>Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>
>>>> :nelohT
>
>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>
>Note: no response.

Response.
>
>>>>>> :nelohT
>
>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>
>>> Note: no response.
>
>> Response.
>
>I see that you didn't answer the question, Deco. No surprise there,
>really.

Classic hallucination on your part, Tholen.
>
>>>>>>>> :nelohT
>
>>>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>
>>>>> Note: no response.
>
>>> Note: still no response.
>
>> Response.
>
>I see that you didn't answer the question, Deco. No surprise there,
>really.

Classic hallucination on your part, Tholen.
>
>>>>>>>>> Daniel Kolle wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>>> Cypherpunk@nyc.rr.com wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>>>> Do youz like wabbits, trolen?
>
>>>>>>>>>> Tholz is incapable of liking anything, Cypherpunk.
>
>>>>>>>>> Who is "Tholz", Kolle? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that
>>>>>>>>> alias.
>
>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>
>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>> Non sequitur.
>
>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>> Illogical.
>
>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>
>Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

On your part, Tholen.
>

--
"Substantiation that you regard yourself as a God to be worhsipped [sic]
should be your concern, Deco."
-- David Tholen

Art Deco writes:

> :nelohT

Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?

>>> :nelohT

>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?

Note: no response.

>>>>> :nelohT

>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?

>> Note: no response.

> Response.

I see that you didn't answer the question, Deco. No surprise there,
really.

>>>>>>> :nelohT

>>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?

>>>> Note: no response.

>>> Response.

>> I see that you didn't answer the question, Deco. No surprise there,
>> really.

> Classic hallucination on your part, Tholen.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim on your part, Deco.

>>>>>>>>> :nelohT

>>>>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?

>>>>>> Note: no response.

>>>> Note: still no response.

>>> Response.

>> I see that you didn't answer the question, Deco. No surprise there,
>> really.

> Classic hallucination on your part, Tholen.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim on your part, Deco.

>>>>>>>>>> Daniel Kolle wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>> Cypherpunk@nyc.rr.com wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>> Do youz like wabbits, trolen?

>>>>>>>>>>> Tholz is incapable of liking anything, Cypherpunk.

>>>>>>>>>> Who is "Tholz", Kolle? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that
>>>>>>>>>> alias.

>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.

>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

>>>>>>> Non sequitur.

>>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

>>>>> Illogical.

>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.

>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

> On your part, Tholen.

Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

:nelohT

>Cla

Posting problems again, Tholen? Nothing came through.

--
"Substantiation that you regard yourself as a God to be worhsipped [sic]
should be your concern, Deco."
-- David Tholen

Art Deco writes:

> :nelohT

Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?

>> Cla

> Posting problems again, Tholen?

What does your question have to do with college basketball, Deco?

> Nothing came through.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

Art Deco wrote:
> ah wrote:
>>Art Deco wrote:
>>> :nelohT
>>>
>>>>Daniel Kolle writes:
>>>>
>>>>> Cypherpunk@nyc.rr.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> Do youz like wabbits, trolen?
>>>>
>>>>> Tholz is incapable of liking anything, Cypherpunk.
>>>>
>>>>Who is "Tholz", Kolle? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that
>>>>alias.
>>>
>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>>
>>How ironic.
>
> Classic pontification.

On your part.
--
ah

tholen@antispam.ham wrote:
> Art Deco writes:
>
>> :nelohT
>
> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>
>>> Cla
>
>> Posting problems again, Tholen?
>
> What does your question have to do with college basketball, Deco?
>
>> Nothing came through.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

I can verify.
--
ah

ah wrote:
>tholen@antispam.ham wrote:
>> Art Deco writes:
>>
>>> :nelohT
>>
>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>>
>>>> Cla
>>
>>> Posting problems again, Tholen?
>>
>> What does your question have to do with college basketball, Deco?
>>
>>> Nothing came through.
>>
>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>I can verify.

He can verify.

--
"Substantiation that you regard yourself as a God to be worhsipped [sic]
should be your concern, Deco."
-- David Tholen

ah wrote:
>Art Deco wrote:
>> ah wrote:
>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>> :nelohT
>>>>
>>>>>Daniel Kolle writes:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Cypherpunk@nyc.rr.com wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Do youz like wabbits, trolen?
>>>>>
>>>>>> Tholz is incapable of liking anything, Cypherpunk.
>>>>>
>>>>>Who is "Tholz", Kolle? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that
>>>>>alias.
>>>>
>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>>>
>>>How ironic.
>>
>> Classic pontification.
>
>On your part.

Classic lack of specificity.

--
"Substantiation that you regard yourself as a God to be worhsipped [sic]
should be your concern, Deco."
-- David Tholen