Art Deco wrote:

>Archie Leach wrote:
>>Art Deco wrote:
>>
>>>MU wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 17:07:59 +0000 (UTC), Cary Kittrell wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> It's a side effect of the mockery he receives for declaring
>>>>> that knowing the calorie ratings of foods is worthless.
>>>>
>>>>Practically, it is. Since there is no such thing as certified caloric
>>>>intakes.
>>>
>>>A strawman. The existence or non-existence of any certifications for
>>>the energy densities of food is irrelevant to the fact that energy
>>>densities of food vary greatly.
>>>>
>>>>> Why? Because if you eat the food, then you can't
>>>>> also burn that same food in a bomb calorimeter to detrmine its
>>>>> caloric value. Get it?
>>>>
>>>>Yes, true, next.....
>>>>
>>>>> If your table of calories
>>>>> lists a pound of butter at 3000 calories, that's
>>>>> worthless information -- because the pound of
>>>>> butter they tested isn't the pound of butter
>>>>> you consumed.
>>>>
>>>>Could very well be the case. Did the entire pound enter the body for calorc
>>>>use? Do you chemically analyze your poo-poo?
>>>
>>>Which has nothing to do with Chung's bogus claims that being constantly
>>>hungry automatically results in complete health and supplies the energy
>>>needed for elite-level endurance sports.
>>>>
>>>>> No, I am not making this up. Chung's most gifted
>>>>> and creative detractors could not come with something
>>>>> this whack.
>>>>
>>>>Count me in. Feel free to disqualify anything I have posted here. you won't
>>>>b/c you can't.
>>>>
>>>>> Getting back to his dragging e=mc^2 into all this,
>>>>> immodesty compels me to re-post my response
>>>>> :
>>>>
>>>>Go ahead. Surely it's better than school yard name-calling, honest argument
>>>>is.
>>>>
>>>>If you are honest. and you are not.
>>>
>>>
>>>How ironic.
>>>
>>
>>Hi, Tholen!
>
>Hi, Tholen!

Hi, Tholen!

Archie Leach wrote:
>Art Deco wrote:
>
>>Archie Leach wrote:
>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>
>>>>MU wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 17:07:59 +0000 (UTC), Cary Kittrell wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> It's a side effect of the mockery he receives for declaring
>>>>>> that knowing the calorie ratings of foods is worthless.
>>>>>
>>>>>Practically, it is. Since there is no such thing as certified caloric
>>>>>intakes.
>>>>
>>>>A strawman. The existence or non-existence of any certifications for
>>>>the energy densities of food is irrelevant to the fact that energy
>>>>densities of food vary greatly.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Why? Because if you eat the food, then you can't
>>>>>> also burn that same food in a bomb calorimeter to detrmine its
>>>>>> caloric value. Get it?
>>>>>
>>>>>Yes, true, next.....
>>>>>
>>>>>> If your table of calories
>>>>>> lists a pound of butter at 3000 calories, that's
>>>>>> worthless information -- because the pound of
>>>>>> butter they tested isn't the pound of butter
>>>>>> you consumed.
>>>>>
>>>>>Could very well be the case. Did the entire pound enter the body for calorc
>>>>>use? Do you chemically analyze your poo-poo?
>>>>
>>>>Which has nothing to do with Chung's bogus claims that being constantly
>>>>hungry automatically results in complete health and supplies the energy
>>>>needed for elite-level endurance sports.
>>>>>
>>>>>> No, I am not making this up. Chung's most gifted
>>>>>> and creative detractors could not come with something
>>>>>> this whack.
>>>>>
>>>>>Count me in. Feel free to disqualify anything I have posted here. you won't
>>>>>b/c you can't.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Getting back to his dragging e=mc^2 into all this,
>>>>>> immodesty compels me to re-post my response
>>>>>> :
>>>>>
>>>>>Go ahead. Surely it's better than school yard name-calling, honest argument
>>>>>is.
>>>>>
>>>>>If you are honest. and you are not.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>How ironic.
>>>>
>>>
>>>Hi, Tholen!
>>
>>Hi, Tholen!
>
>Hi, Tholen!

Hi, Tholen!

--
Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco
Official "Usenet psychopath and born-again LLPOF minion",
as designated by Brad Guth
COOSN-266-06-39716

"Art Deco" wrote in message
news:011220071813249713%erfc@caballista.org...
> Archie Leach wrote:
> >Art Deco wrote:
> >
> >>Archie Leach wrote:
> >>>Art Deco wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>MU wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 17:07:59 +0000 (UTC), Cary Kittrell wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> It's a side effect of the mockery he receives for declaring
> >>>>>> that knowing the calorie ratings of foods is worthless.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Practically, it is. Since there is no such thing as certified
caloric
> >>>>>intakes.
> >>>>
> >>>>A strawman. The existence or non-existence of any certifications
for
> >>>>the energy densities of food is irrelevant to the fact that energy
> >>>>densities of food vary greatly.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Why? Because if you eat the food, then you can't
> >>>>>> also burn that same food in a bomb calorimeter to detrmine its
> >>>>>> caloric value. Get it?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Yes, true, next.....
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> If your table of calories
> >>>>>> lists a pound of butter at 3000 calories, that's
> >>>>>> worthless information -- because the pound of
> >>>>>> butter they tested isn't the pound of butter
> >>>>>> you consumed.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Could very well be the case. Did the entire pound enter the body
for calorc
> >>>>>use? Do you chemically analyze your poo-poo?
> >>>>
> >>>>Which has nothing to do with Chung's bogus claims that being
constantly
> >>>>hungry automatically results in complete health and supplies the
energy
> >>>>needed for elite-level endurance sports.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> No, I am not making this up. Chung's most gifted
> >>>>>> and creative detractors could not come with something
> >>>>>> this whack.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Count me in. Feel free to disqualify anything I have posted here.
you won't
> >>>>>b/c you can't.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Getting back to his dragging e=mc^2 into all this,
> >>>>>> immodesty compels me to re-post my response
> >>>>>> :
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Go ahead. Surely it's better than school yard name-calling,
honest argument
> >>>>>is.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>If you are honest. and you are not.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>How ironic.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>Hi, Tholen!
> >>
> >>Hi, Tholen!
> >
> >Hi, Tholen!
>
> Hi, Tholen!

Hi, Pedo Deco!