Re: Tholen, the Usenet fence post: Re: digest, volume 2454416 - OS2

This is a discussion on Re: Tholen, the Usenet fence post: Re: digest, volume 2454416 - OS2 ; > =?UTF-8?B?wqrCusKqIHJyb2Nr?= wrote: > > tholen@antispam.ham wrote: > >> DVH writes: >> >> >>> That Tholen really is an athole. >> >> >> Classic ambiguity. >> > > ****head. > ****head....

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Re: Tholen, the Usenet fence post: Re: digest, volume 2454416

  1. Re: Tholen, the Usenet fence post: Re: digest, volume 2454416

    >
    =?UTF-8?B?wqrCusKqIHJyb2Nr?= wrote:
    >
    > tholen@antispam.ham wrote:
    >
    >> DVH writes:
    >>
    >>
    >>> That Tholen really is an athole.

    >>
    >>
    >> Classic ambiguity.
    >>

    >
    > ****head.
    >

    ****head.

  2. Re: Tholen, the Usenet fence post: Re: digest, volume 2454416

    Riffulon writes:

    > Tung Mai Sak wrote:


    >> bug4DEB0BA2 wrote:


    >>> invalid@address.here wrote:


    >>>>> DVH wrote:


    >>>>>> That Tholen really is an athole.


    >>>>> Classic ambiguity.


    >>>> ****head.


    >>> ****head.


    >> RICK MY BARRSACK


    > Wipe that **** out of my hat, you cunt.


    What does that have to do with OS/2, Riffulon?


+ Reply to Thread