Great!
Can you commit the mingw64 other stuff?

On 11/1/08, Andy Polyakov via RT wrote:
> >> I managed to produce them myself with
> >> mingw-w64-bin_x86-64-linux_20080921.tar.bz2. Modified sha512.c is fine,

> >
> > Great!
> > My environment is gcc-4.3.2, binutils-CVS-head, mingw-w64-SVN-head as

>
>
> 20080921 is equipped with gcc-4.4.0 and whatever the rest it is equipped
> with.
>
>
> >> modified bn_lcl.h gives ~2x improvement. All tests pass except for the
> >> last Whirlpool test. It's a compiler bug, because if I drop optimization
> >> level to -O1 when compiling wp_block.c, the test passes.

> >
> > Can you please send this hank as attachment?

>
>
> http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=17580.
>
>
> >> Strangely enough the code in question is not compiled in VC-* build...
> >> Basically there is no need for GetModuleHandle("avdapi32") and
> >> consequent GetProcAddress calls, because the functions in question are
> >> present on all WinNT *and* Win9x. On latter they do nothing, but they
> >> are present, so that application won't suffer from startup errors if you
> >> link them explicitly.

> >
> > So do we need it or don't we?

>
>
> http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=17583. A.
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________ ____________________
> OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
> Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
> Automated List Manager majordomo@openssl.org
>

__________________________________________________ ____________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager majordomo@openssl.org