This is a discussion on Re: openssl smime and performance - Openssl ; Ok thanks for the information Stephen. On Jan 16, 2008 3:14 PM, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote: > On Wed, Jan 16, 2008, Fabien Penso wrote: > > > > What key size are you using? If it is something large ...
Ok thanks for the information Stephen.
On Jan 16, 2008 3:14 PM, Dr. Stephen Henson
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2008, Fabien Penso wrote:
> > > What key size are you using? If it is something large like 8192 bits it will
> > > take longer. You also have the overhead of running the openssl command each
> > > time.
> > standard "RSA Public Key: (4096 bit)", nothing fancy. I feel like 17
> > seconds per 100 mails is slow. I was hoping I would find a way to go
> > faster.
> Well a quick test on my laptop with:
> openssl speed rsa4096
> Gives 6.7 signs/s which isn't that far from what you are seeing. Try a smaller
> key size. 2048 bits is fine and gives 44.2 sign/s on my setup.
> A 1024 bit key would be faster still but their use is now being discouraged.
> Dr Stephen N. Henson. Email, S/MIME and PGP keys: see homepage
> OpenSSL project core developer and freelance consultant.
> Homepage: http://www.drh-consultancy.demon.co.uk
> __________________________________________________ ____________________
> OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
> User Support Mailing List firstname.lastname@example.org
> Automated List Manager email@example.com
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List firstname.lastname@example.org
Automated List Manager email@example.com