This is a discussion on RE: nasm vs. masm - Openssl ; Cool. I figured you guys are mostly testing with nasm so that's what I'm using. But I was just curious if anybody has done any benchmark tests to see whether one assembler generated more efficient assembly than the other that ...
Cool. I figured you guys are mostly testing with nasm so that's what
I'm using. But I was just curious if anybody has done any benchmark
tests to see whether one assembler generated more efficient assembly
than the other that would result in noticeably better performance.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-openssl-users@openssl.org [mailtowner-openssl-
> users@openssl.org] On Behalf Of Dr. Stephen Henson
> Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 4:22 AM
> To: openssl-users@openssl.org
> Subject: Re: nasm vs. masm
>=20
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2007, Edward Chan wrote:
>=20
> > Anybody have any idea which assembler is preferred when building
with
> > VC8?
> >
>=20
> Currently you can use either but in future nasm will be the only
supported
> assembler. This is the case with 0.9.9-dev.
>=20
> Steve.
> --
> Dr Stephen N. Henson. Email, S/MIME and PGP keys: see homepage
> OpenSSL project core developer and freelance consultant.
> Funding needed! Details on homepage.
> Homepage: http://www.drh-consultancy.demon.co.uk
> __________________________________________________ ____________________
> OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
> User Support Mailing List openssl-users@openssl.org
> Automated List Manager majordomo@openssl.org
__________________________________________________ ____________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List openssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager majordomo@openssl.org
