This is a discussion on Re: Patch: save/load state of SHA1 - v2 - Openssl ; On Tue, Jun 12, 2007, Goetz Babin-Ebell wrote: > --On Jun 12, 2007 18:28:49 +0200 Nanno Langstraat wrote: > > >v2 of the SHA save patch. > > Is there a special reason to limit it to SHA ? > ...
On Tue, Jun 12, 2007, Goetz Babin-Ebell wrote:
> --On Jun 12, 2007 18:28:49 +0200 Nanno Langstraatwrote:
>
> >v2 of the SHA save patch.
>
> Is there a special reason to limit it to SHA ?
> Why not a EVP_MD_CTX_{load|save} ?
>
That would be the preferred option since we've discouraged applications from
using the low level digest routines for some time.
Steve.
--
Dr Stephen N. Henson. Email, S/MIME and PGP keys: see homepage
OpenSSL project core developer and freelance consultant.
Funding needed! Details on homepage.
Homepage: http://www.drh-consultancy.demon.co.uk
__________________________________________________ ____________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager majordomo@openssl.org