Thank you very much for the information.

--- Erwann ABALEA wrote:

> Bonsoir,
>=20
> Hodie VI Id. Iun. MMVII est, durgaprasad jammula
> scripsit:
> > This question is regarding the extended key usage
> > extension implementation which differs from the
> > specification [RFC 2459].
> >=20
> > I read RFC 2459 in
> > http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2459.html section

> 4.2.1.13
> > Extended key usage field.=20

>=20
> The corresponding paragraph of the RFC3280 (RFC2459
> is obsolete, and
> superseded by RFC3280) reads:
>=20
> "If the extension is present, then the certificate
> MUST only be used
> for one of the purposes indicated."
>=20
> RFC3280 is much more clear and unambigous than
> RFC2459.
>=20
> --=20
> Erwann ABALEA
>

__________________________________________________ ____________________
> OpenSSL Project =20
> http://www.openssl.org
> Development Mailing List =20
> openssl-dev@openssl.org
> Automated List Manager =20
> majordomo@openssl.org
>=20




=20
__________________________________________________ _______________________=
___________
Building a website is a piece of cake. Yahoo! Small Business gives you al=
l the tools to get online.
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/webhosting=20
__________________________________________________ ____________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager majordomo@openssl.org