I think so. At the very least, it points out that there's something
that needs to be added.

My opinion, this is only my own opinion.

-Kyle H

On 12/1/06, Nils Larsch via RT wrote:
>
> via RT wrote:
> > Some X509v3 OIDs from RFC 2459 are currently missing from objects.txt:
> >
> > * X509v3 Certificate Issuer
> > * X509v3 Issuing Distribution Point
> > * X509v3 Subject Directory Attributes
> >
> > All the other OIDs from the RFC are already included in OpenSSL. The
> > attached patch introduces the above OIDs.

>
> does it really makes sense to add OIDs when openssl is not
> able to parse these extensions ?
>
> Cheers,
> Nils

__________________________________________________ ____________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager majordomo@openssl.org