Re: What means ENGINE_DYNAMIC_SUPPORT macro?
Victor B. Wagner wrote:[color=blue]
> On 2006.11.14 at 10:59:41 +0000, Ben Laurie wrote:
>>> cvs log doesn't tell anything but "Fix various warnings"[/color]
>> If you compile with -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wstrict-prototypes
>> -Wmissing-declarations -Werror then you'll see the errors I'm fixing.[/color]
>> If people always did that before submitting code, then it wouldn't get
>> broken by fixes :-)[/color]
> Problem is that you probably don't test all the configuration
> variations. And we don't either.
> First of all, I suppose no one now except DJGPP users uses static
> We compile our code with -Wall. And there was only one warning remained,
> in gost_ameth.c which you really fixed by introducing temporary variable
> void *_pval. But we by default use
> ./config shared zlib
> (Although zlib support should not affect current ccgost code)
> Second, there are pieces of code not covered by tests. I rather wouldn't
> touch code I don't understand fully, if I don't have unit test suite to
> ensure that it would work after my modification.
> May be we should start from adding test suite for engine.[/color]
Sounds like a good plan.
> We have some collection of test scripts for PKI and SMIME operations
> which sometimes catch problems missed by standard make test.
> May be someone would integrate it into HEAD?[/color]
Also sounds like a good plan!
"There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he
doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff
OpenSSL Project [url]http://www.openssl.org[/url]
Development Mailing List [email]firstname.lastname@example.org[/email]
Automated List Manager [email]email@example.com[/email]