This is a discussion on Re: Minimal configuration - Openssl ; On 10/20/06, Grant Mills wrote: > First, sorry for posting to -users and -dev. I'm not sure which is > more appropriate. > > I'm working on an embedded system with no operating system and am only > interested in ...
On 10/20/06, Grant Mills
> First, sorry for posting to -users and -dev. I'm not sure which is
> more appropriate.
> I'm working on an embedded system with no operating system and am only
> interested in signature verification. I've looked at the config and
> have decided to go with "no-threads no-zlib no-shared". But I'm
> having trouble deciding which "cpu/compiler" config to go with. I am
> using gcc and mips (not mipsel).
> I'm not worried about resources (have plenty of RAM). I'm only
> interested in verifying signatures. So some extra switches that strip
> out functions that handle encryption or signing would also be great.
> I am looking for the smallest libcrypt possible.
> Any advice would be appreciated. Thanks in advance.
> Grant Mills
Alternatively, if anyone could recommend another solution, I'd be
happy to listen. I get the feeling that I might be using a chain saw,
when a steak knife will do.
Again, thanks in advance.
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List firstname.lastname@example.org
Automated List Manager email@example.com