On 2006.10.20 at 13:51:47 +0200, Andy Polyakov wrote:

> Keep in mind that mingw defines _WIN32_WINNT=0x333, i.e. the intention
> was to target all NT versions [note that 0x333 actually covers even for
> Windows 9x, which has at least all 0x333 stubs, so that application can
> actually start]. As for winsock versioning. Upon latest modifications to
> b_sock.c I considered linking with wsock32 to be sufficient/appropriate
> for following reason. Systems equipped with ws2_32.dll do have wsock32
> too, and this wsock32.dll is actually linked with ws2_32.dll. Meaning
> that [legacy] application linked with wsock32 alone will actually bring
> even ws2_32.dll into address space. Now note that b_sock.c makes
> *global* lookups for getaddrinfo, meaning that application linked with

Hmm, actually -lws2_32 is not strictly neccessary.

Are there tests for IPV6 in BIO in the test suite?

__________________________________________________ ____________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager majordomo@openssl.org