Re: Typo ?
I forget the order of precedence -- does the unary ! have a higher
priority than the comparison operator !=3D ?
i.e., the original code is
if (!(data->state) !=3D BIO_CONN_S_OK)
What on earth is this supposed to do?
data->state =3D=3D (anything except 0):
!(data->state) =3D=3D 0.
if (0 !=3D BIO_CONN_S_OK)?
data->state =3D=3D 0:
!(data->state) =3D=3D 1.
if (1 !=3D BIO_CONN_S_OK)?
On 1/31/06, Fr=E9d=E9ric Donnat <email@example.com> wrote:[color=blue]
> Hi all,
> I 've already seen some mail about this commit.
> It sounds to me like a typo, but ...
> - Comment is "add missing parentheses"
> - diff is as follow
> - if (!data->state !=3D BIO_CONN_S_OK)
> + if (!(data->state !=3D BIO_CONN_S_OK))
> This is chnaging the beahavior of static long conn_ctrl(BIO *b, int cmd, =[/color]
long num, void *ptr) function.[color=blue]
> I think it is a typo (just like some other epople using openssl).
> Nils, could you please confirm me that, or explain me the reason why chan=[/color]
> Thanks in advance.
> OpenSSL Project [url]http://www.openssl.org[/url]
> Development Mailing List [email]firstname.lastname@example.org[/email]
> Automated List Manager [email]email@example.com[/email]
OpenSSL Project [url]http://www.openssl.org[/url]
Development Mailing List [email]firstname.lastname@example.org[/email]
Automated List Manager [email]email@example.com[/email]