1. I don't expect any thing developed specilay for me, I was just
wondering if there is any one out there that knew about a function
that already exists and does it.

2. I am not designing a system to break in 10 years, I am thinking of
better performance for the time until we need to find a better
solution.

BTW why will I run into trouble at 2015 it should be good up to 2037?
Am I missing some thing?

Thanks,

Joe

On 1/31/06, David Schwartz wrote:
>
> > I will not get certificates today for after 2045 because the
> > certificates that I am checking are certificates that already past a
> > validation check and have been inserted into my cache system, therefor
> > it is a certificate signed by our own system which does not sign for
> > more then 25 year. most are 1 year.
> >
> > Thanks Joe
>
> You may have a special case, but you can't expect the library to b=
e
> designed for your special case. You'll run into trouble after 2015 anyway=
--
> any special reason you're designing things to break in 10 years?
>
> DS
>
>
> __________________________________________________ ____________________
> OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
> Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
> Automated List Manager majordomo@openssl.org
>
__________________________________________________ ____________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager majordomo@openssl.org