Good catch. I think +r was favored over =&r for a reason [like bug in
initial gcc port, note that the code was written prior Opteron was
released], but I've tested now =&r with gcc 3.2 and it's treated
correctly. So I throw it in and syncronize HEAD and 0.9.7-stable. Case
is dismissed. A.

__________________________________________________ ____________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager majordomo@openssl.org