This is a discussion on Re: making telnet secure - openssh ; Thanks All for your suggestions. On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 1:37 AM, Robert Hajime Lanning wrote: > On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 7:51 AM, Sudarshan Soma wrote: >> Thanks all for your valuable inputs. >> >> My telnet ...
Thanks All for your suggestions.
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 1:37 AM, Robert Hajime Lanning
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 7:51 AM, Sudarshan Soma
>> Thanks all for your valuable inputs.
>> My telnet server application has its own way of handling
>> authentication, commands supported,..
>> Hence i cant easily move to ssh. I know i can use SSH to use my own
>> authentication using PAM, but the other things such as commands
>> supported are all not easily done just by moving to ssh server.
>> Based on my requirements , i think tunelling(either stunnel or ssh
>> tuneling) is the best option to go with, if not please suggest any
>> other way you could think of?
>> With tunneling, Can i somehow avoid the client side setup of
>> specifying a non-standard port which will forward requests to sshd.
>> Can it be as easy as below: (I think its not possible, but i just want
>> to confirm that )
>> on the server:
>> - A tunneling port (7778) listens , which forward connections to my
>> application running at port 4050.
>> on the client:
>> use ssh to connect to port 7778. This will make the server port 7778
>> forward the connections to my application port 4050 and back in the
>> same way.
>> Please advice.
>> Best Regards,
> This will be a complex setup on the client side, but this is how ssh
> tunneling works.
> sshd listens on port 22, and has a configuration to allow the specific
> port forwarding you need.
> Accounts the clients will login to need to have a shell that just
> sleeps. (don't allow other commands to run)
> You need to configure the port forwarding: (openssh)
> ssh -N -L4050:localhost:4050 account@server-host
> then on the client:
> telnet localhost 4050
> And, did Galoka think the Ulus were too ugly to save?