This is a discussion on Re: Request for LPK patch to be merged - openssh ; On 7 Dec 2007, at 11:58, Chris Wilson wrote: > Hi all, > > I sent this message a few weeks ago and so far have not had any > reply. Is > there another procedure for requesting such changes? ...
On 7 Dec 2007, at 11:58, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Hi all,
> I sent this message a few weeks ago and so far have not had any
> reply. Is
> there another procedure for requesting such changes?
I am one of the maintainers of the patch. The current release is not
suitable for merging as it is too invasive. We are working on writing
a cleaner version, and I have emailed enabling patches to the list
before, but it seems of limited interested to the OpenSSH developers.
Our attempts to take small easily reviewable steps on our way to a
cleaner implementation have been met with, well, no reaction what so
See: http://marc.info/?l=openssh-unix-dev...5024604825&w=2 and
more recently: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.network.openssh.devel/
The latter bug is now four months old, no reply yet.
So, I wouldn't hold out much hope.
http://www.inversepath.com - Chief R & D Engineer
Inverse Path Ltd, 63 Park Road, Peterborough, PE1 2TN, UK
Registered in England: 5555973
openssh-unix-dev mailing list