Re: Enable gcc's -fstack-protector-all by default?
Darren Tucker wrote:[color=blue]
> Rick Jones wrote:
>> Just general conservativeness would seem to suggest that until a
>> broader number of platforms can be covered, it might not be time to
>> become the default.[/color]
> I should have said "enabled by default if the compiler supports it". If
> the compiler doesn't, configure continues to behave as before.[/color]
I inferred that. I'm just thinking that if there isn't certainty of it
being sufficiently neutral on a broad swath of platforms, even if the
compiler supports it it might be best to leave things be for the moment.
ever the paranoid luddite :)
openssh-unix-dev mailing list