On 11/11/05, Curt, WE7U wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Nov 2005, Curt, WE7U wrote:
>
> > Is there an easy way to get the "none" option back into OpenSSH? In
> > order to do TCP/IP over amateur radio in the U.S. (and most other
> > countries) we must not use encryption to obscure the meaning of our
> > info, but we are allowed to use authentication to set up the links.

> Is there no answer back from the devel. team on this one? We've
> been struggling to keep this option compiled in and it's been
> getting harder to find old enough versions that the patches will
> apply to, and harder to compile such on newer systems.


Don't the high-performance networking patch guys also keep a none
option available. afaik they have working patches for the latest and
greatest openssh versions.

> I got one reply off-sig from someone who keeps newer patches
> available, but why should this be necessary? If there's a
> demonstrated need from some group of users can't this function be
> included in the sources as it used to be? It can be made more
> difficult to accidentally compile in as a default, perhaps a
> special #define or something that needs to be set or uncommented.


No comment here... developer decision But I wouldn't mind if the
none version from hpn would be included... as long as it's never ever
used as a default and prints a huge warning if it ever is used
without some switch/configoption to disable the warning

> Again, this is for use over amateur radio links, and the FCC doesn't
> allow us to encrypt over radio links. We're allowed to
> authenticate, but not encrypt the data over a link.


That sucks

--
Mark Janssen -- maniac(at)maniac.nl -- pgp: 0x357D2178 | ,''`. |
Unix / Linux Open-Source and Internet Consultant @ Snow.nl | : :' : |
Maniac.nl MarkJanssen.nl NerdNet.nl Unix.nl | `. `' |
Skype: markmjanssen ICQ: 129696007 irc: FooBar on undernet | `- |

_______________________________________________
openssh-unix-dev mailing list
openssh-unix-dev@mindrot.org
http://www.mindrot.org/mailman/listi...enssh-unix-dev