***SPAM*** Atom complie error (with latest LinuxPPS) - NTP

This is a discussion on ***SPAM*** Atom complie error (with latest LinuxPPS) - NTP ; Dear All, I'm trying to get NTP and the latest 2.6 LinuxPPS patch working together. I'm having problems. I'm using the latest LinuxPPS (from the 'git' repository), NTP version 4.2.2p3 and Linux 2.6.17. LinuxPPS compiles fine and I can see ...

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: ***SPAM*** Atom complie error (with latest LinuxPPS)

  1. ***SPAM*** Atom complie error (with latest LinuxPPS)

    Dear All,

    I'm trying to get NTP and the latest 2.6 LinuxPPS patch working
    together. I'm having problems.

    I'm using the latest LinuxPPS (from the 'git' repository), NTP version
    4.2.2p3 and Linux 2.6.17.

    LinuxPPS compiles fine and I can see my PPS source ticking away at
    /proc/pps/00/assert.

    I've copied timepps.h to /usr/include/sys.

    When I try to compile NTP (with ot special configure options), I get
    these errors:

    refclock_atom.c: In function 'atom_shutdown':
    refclock_atom.c:227: error: invalid operands to binary !=
    refclock_atom.c: In function 'atom_ppsapi':
    refclock_atom.c:278: error: invalid operands to binary ==
    refclock_atom.c: In function 'atom_timer':
    refclock_atom.c:348: error: invalid operands to binary ==
    make[2]: *** [refclock_atom.o] Error 1
    make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/tom/ntp-4.2.2p3/ntpd'
    make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
    make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/tom/ntp-4.2.2p3'
    make: *** [all] Error 2

    I have attached my version of timepps.c and NTP's config.h

    Anyone know how to solve this?

    Tom

    _______________________________________________
    questions mailing list
    questions@lists.ntp.isc.org
    https://lists.ntp.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/questions

  2. Re: ***SPAM*** Atom complie error (with latest LinuxPPS)

    tom.playford@gmail.com (Tom Playford) writes:

    > Dear All,
    >
    > I'm trying to get NTP and the latest 2.6 LinuxPPS patch working
    > together. I'm having problems.


    As far as I know the kernel people dropped the PPS stuff from the kernel
    recently. Maybe www.kernel.org has some docs on that. Do you have the
    "3932m-2.17.8" version of the PPSkit-light-alpha patch?

    Regards,
    Ulrich
    [...]

+ Reply to Thread