>Basically, a valid SNTP server is supposed to be sourced directly from
>a reference, never from a remote NTP server.


Just to clarify: the recommendation is that the SNTP server get it
directly from a reference in preference to gettting it from a remote
server via SNTP (That remote server may or may not be an NTP server as
well). But if the SNTP server gets it from a remote NTP server via
NTP, that's fine.

With both SNTP and NTP, it's always better to get time from a radio
clock rather than a remote server. But if you set up a multilevel SNTP
tree, the leaves are going to be less accurate than in an NTP tree of the
same depth. I.e. depth costs you more in SNTP than in NTP.

I think you have to take recommendations like this in the RFC with a
grain of salt, because the authors don't know what your requirements
are. Maybe <500 ms accuracy isn't worth the price of either a radio
clock or NTP to you. In that case, a 3-deep SNTP network could be the
best way to go.

--
Bryan Henderson Phone 408-621-2000
San Jose, California
_______________________________________________
questions mailing list
questions@lists.ntp.isc.org
https://lists.ntp.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/questions