Alan Balmer crawled to the nearest keyboard and
summoned the courage to write:

>On Thu, 08 Apr 2004 21:46:52 GMT, greger@votenader.org wrote:
>
>>Spam from VoteNader.org? (Or naderexplore04.org)
>
>You didn't spam us before, but you're spamming us now? Good to know
>that this is the *genuine* spam, and not the false spam.

It's a frame-up. Note the hashbusting text tacked onto the end of the
OP. I point this out only in the interest of fairness as I am
DEFINITELY no fan of the reckless, egomaniacal spoiler candidate Ralph
Nader.


--
"The Great Satan put electricity in my toothpaste."

Charles Hawtrey wrote:

> Alan Balmer crawled to the nearest keyboard and
> summoned the courage to write:
>
>> On Thu, 08 Apr 2004 21:46:52 GMT, greger@votenader.org wrote:
>>
>>> Spam from VoteNader.org? (Or naderexplore04.org)
>>
>> You didn't spam us before, but you're spamming us now? Good to know
>> that this is the *genuine* spam, and not the false spam.
>
> It's a frame-up. Note the hashbusting text tacked onto the end of the
> OP. I point this out only in the interest of fairness as I am
> DEFINITELY no fan of the reckless, egomaniacal spoiler candidate Ralph
> Nader.

If he can spoil the chances for Kerry getting elected, then he's got my
applause.

Hey, it's an election year. Equal time.

-Doug

FIX THE ELECTION SYSTEM, DON'T BLAME NADER
From http://www.systemsthinker.com/writin...amenader.shtml

The "spoiler" issue is actually a flaw in our election system, and we
don't have to put up with it. We can fix that problem. We are working
to do just that in Ferndale, Michigan through a system called Instant
Runoff Voting. It is used all over the world, is endorsed by John
McCain, Howard Dean, and USA Today, and would make sure there are
never spoilers again in American elections. For more information
visit, http://www.firv.org and http://www.fairvote.org/irv

Democrats and Republicans need to stop complaining about third parties
"spoiling" elections unless they are willing to support Instant Runoff
Voting to ensure it never happens again. If they won't support this
common sense reform, then there is really no alternative to third
parties but to continue having their voices heard by running anyways.
Imagine if as much energy was put into fixing the fundamental problem
in the election system as is put towards discouraging and vilifying
third party candidates who really represent the victims of the system
enforced by the two major parties themselves.

Also See: http://www.firv.org/pressreleases/naderirvpr22204.html

Detroit Free Press article in support of IRV due to Nader:
http://www.freep.com/news/politics/d...5_20040225.htm

Oakland Press article in support of IRV due to Nader:
http://www.fairvote.org/editorials/oakland.htm

For more of Ferndale for Instant Runoff Voting In The News see
http://www.firv.org/inthenews.html



Doug Hoffman wrote in message news:...
> Charles Hawtrey wrote:
>
> > Alan Balmer crawled to the nearest keyboard and
> > summoned the courage to write:
> >
> >> On Thu, 08 Apr 2004 21:46:52 GMT, greger@votenader.org wrote:
> >>
> >>> Spam from VoteNader.org? (Or naderexplore04.org)
> >>
> >> You didn't spam us before, but you're spamming us now? Good to know
> >> that this is the *genuine* spam, and not the false spam.
> >
> > It's a frame-up. Note the hashbusting text tacked onto the end of the
> > OP. I point this out only in the interest of fairness as I am
> > DEFINITELY no fan of the reckless, egomaniacal spoiler candidate Ralph
> > Nader.
>
> If he can spoil the chances for Kerry getting elected, then he's got my
> applause.
>
> Hey, it's an election year. Equal time.
>
> -Doug

On 10 Apr 2004 04:01:18 -0700, howhow84@hotmail.com (Howard) wrote:

>The "spoiler" issue is actually a flaw in our election system, and we

*You* are a flaw in comp.sys.hp.hpux. This is off-topic. Go away.

--
Al Balmer
Balmer Consulting
removebalmerconsultingthis@att.net