Phillip Jones wrote:
>(I find it funny that the Bugzilla page shows 291 warnings
>using the HTML Validator extension)
>
>I'm finding so far the only two pages that appear to be correct is
>Mozilla's Home Page and my website.
>

There are plenty of non-bozos out there:
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=ht...w.clamwin.com/
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=ht...unitylinux.org
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=ht...ww.debian.org/
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://fark.com
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=ht...eecontrib.org/
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=ht...ww.gentoo.org/
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=ht...on-flow-chart/
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=ht...t-to-read.html
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.ic3.gov/
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=ht...es/lsmod8.html
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=ht....nerdkits.com/
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=ht...irregularities
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=ht...stering/kiosk/
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=ht...xtensions.html
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=ht...ction_fee.html
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://veecad.com/
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=ht....org/wiki/HTML