fixunix
Tags Register FAQ Members List Social Groups Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Firefox 3.0.3 vs Seamonkey 1.1.9 - Mozilla

This is a discussion on Firefox 3.0.3 vs Seamonkey 1.1.9 - Mozilla ; I have not upgraded Seamonkey yet but Firefox was just upgraded to 3.0.3 and I now have a problem with Firefox when printing to a .pdf. I have an old faithful version of Acrobat PDF Writer that I got somewhere ...


Fix Unix > Tools > Mozilla > Firefox 3.0.3 vs Seamonkey 1.1.9

Reply
 
LinkBack Tools
  #1  
Old 09-30-2008, 03:57 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 0
Default Firefox 3.0.3 vs Seamonkey 1.1.9

I have not upgraded Seamonkey yet but Firefox was just upgraded to 3.0.3
and I now have a problem with Firefox when printing to a .pdf.

I have an old faithful version of Acrobat PDF Writer that I got
somewhere along the line with some hardware that I bought. Anyway,
since going to 3.0.3, the PDF Writer puts out garbage.

If I have a blank page (eg. about:blank) and print it from Seamonkey,
the header says "about:blank" in readable characters.

If I do the same thing from Firefox the header says "D ERXW  EO D Q N
" with the characters overlaying each other.

Both Firefox and Seamonkey have the character encoding set to Unicode
(UTF-8).

I don't remember this happening with an earlier version of Firefox (but
I don't recall when the last time I used the PDF Writer to asve a .pdf
of a page).

Does anyone have any idea what is going on?
More importantly, does anyone know how I can get Firefox to work correctly?


--
The Frosted Flake
+------------------------ SPAM is for eating ------------------------+
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-30-2008, 05:16 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 0
Default Re: Firefox 3.0.3 vs Seamonkey 1.1.9

Frosted_Flake wrote:
> I have not upgraded Seamonkey yet but Firefox was just upgraded to 3.0.3
> and I now have a problem with Firefox when printing to a .pdf.
>
> I have an old faithful version of Acrobat PDF Writer that I got
> somewhere along the line with some hardware that I bought. Anyway,
> since going to 3.0.3, the PDF Writer puts out garbage.
>
> If I have a blank page (eg. about:blank) and print it from Seamonkey,
> the header says "about:blank" in readable characters.
>
> If I do the same thing from Firefox the header says "D ERXW  EO D Q N
> " with the characters overlaying each other.
>
> Both Firefox and Seamonkey have the character encoding set to Unicode
> (UTF-8).
>
> I don't remember this happening with an earlier version of Firefox (but
> I don't recall when the last time I used the PDF Writer to asve a .pdf
> of a page).
>
> Does anyone have any idea what is going on?
> More importantly, does anyone know how I can get Firefox to work correctly?
>
>

Just checked with IE 7, it works the same as Seamonkey (it does NOT
corrupt the output .pdf as does Firefox_.


--
The Frosted Flake
+------------------------ SPAM is for eating ------------------------+
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-30-2008, 12:38 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 0
Default Re: Firefox 3.0.3 vs Seamonkey 1.1.9

Frosted_Flake wrote:
> I have not upgraded Seamonkey yet but Firefox was just upgraded to 3.0.3
> and I now have a problem with Firefox when printing to a .pdf.
>
> I have an old faithful version of Acrobat PDF Writer that I got
> somewhere along the line with some hardware that I bought. Anyway,
> since going to 3.0.3, the PDF Writer puts out garbage.
>
> If I have a blank page (eg. about:blank) and print it from Seamonkey,
> the header says "about:blank" in readable characters.
>
> If I do the same thing from Firefox the header says "D ERXW  EO D Q N
> " with the characters overlaying each other.
>
> Both Firefox and Seamonkey have the character encoding set to Unicode
> (UTF-8).
>
> I don't remember this happening with an earlier version of Firefox (but
> I don't recall when the last time I used the PDF Writer to asve a .pdf
> of a page).
>
> Does anyone have any idea what is going on?
> More importantly, does anyone know how I can get Firefox to work correctly?
>
>

It appears that it is a known bug relating to Adobe PDF Writer & certain
printer drivers:

"Bug 454532 - Font glyphs incorrectly displayed with certain printer
drivers"

This comment contains an analysis of the problem:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=454532#c3

Its a bit long, and gets rather technical, so I'll quote the relevant,
user-friendly parts:

"After reading through all these bug reports there appears to be at
least two separate bugs:

1) Firefox always prints garbage with Adobe PDF Writer. No known workaround.

....

Acrobat 5 comes with two printer drivers: PDF Writer and Distiller.
Printing from Firefox 3 to Distiller works fine. Printing to PDF Writer
produces garbage.

....

Possible solutions to this bug are:

....

2) Use Distiller instead of PDF Writer. And in more recent version of
Acrobat this is the only option."

And for a peek at the, perhaps not-so-distant future:

"3) Fix the remaining issues with the cairo PDF export and make this
available from the user interface. This is my preferred solution :-)."

And in a follow up to that, another developer responds:

"I agree with going with option 3 -- we should also detect PDF Writer
and notify the user that this isn't going to work and that they should
use Distiller or something. Doing this notification sounds painful,
though, but it's doable.
Also, we won't be able to fix that for firefox 3.0, would have to go
into 3.1.

So, it looks like FF will get native pdf printing ability.

--
Alex K.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-30-2008, 09:08 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 0
Default Re: Firefox 3.0.3 vs Seamonkey 1.1.9

Alex K. wrote:
> Frosted_Flake wrote:
>> I have not upgraded Seamonkey yet but Firefox was just upgraded to 3.0.3
>> and I now have a problem with Firefox when printing to a .pdf.
>>
>> I have an old faithful version of Acrobat PDF Writer that I got
>> somewhere along the line with some hardware that I bought. Anyway,
>> since going to 3.0.3, the PDF Writer puts out garbage.
>>
>> If I have a blank page (eg. about:blank) and print it from Seamonkey,
>> the header says "about:blank" in readable characters.
>>
>> If I do the same thing from Firefox the header says "D ERXW  EO D Q N
>> " with the characters overlaying each other.
>>
>> Both Firefox and Seamonkey have the character encoding set to Unicode
>> (UTF-8).
>>
>> I don't remember this happening with an earlier version of Firefox (but
>> I don't recall when the last time I used the PDF Writer to asve a .pdf
>> of a page).
>>
>> Does anyone have any idea what is going on?
>> More importantly, does anyone know how I can get Firefox to work correctly?
>>
>>

> It appears that it is a known bug relating to Adobe PDF Writer & certain
> printer drivers:
>
> "Bug 454532 - Font glyphs incorrectly displayed with certain printer
> drivers"
>
> This comment contains an analysis of the problem:
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=454532#c3
>
> Its a bit long, and gets rather technical, so I'll quote the relevant,
> user-friendly parts:
>
> "After reading through all these bug reports there appears to be at
> least two separate bugs:
>
> 1) Firefox always prints garbage with Adobe PDF Writer. No known workaround.
>
> ...
>
> Acrobat 5 comes with two printer drivers: PDF Writer and Distiller.
> Printing from Firefox 3 to Distiller works fine. Printing to PDF Writer
> produces garbage.
>
> ...
>
> Possible solutions to this bug are:
>
> ...
>
> 2) Use Distiller instead of PDF Writer. And in more recent version of
> Acrobat this is the only option."
>
> And for a peek at the, perhaps not-so-distant future:
>
> "3) Fix the remaining issues with the cairo PDF export and make this
> available from the user interface. This is my preferred solution :-)."
>
> And in a follow up to that, another developer responds:
>
> "I agree with going with option 3 -- we should also detect PDF Writer
> and notify the user that this isn't going to work and that they should
> use Distiller or something. Doing this notification sounds painful,
> though, but it's doable.
> Also, we won't be able to fix that for firefox 3.0, would have to go
> into 3.1.
>
> So, it looks like FF will get native pdf printing ability.
>

OK, I understand the problem butnot how to fix it. I do NOT have
Distiller and can't seem to locate where to get it (I do see something
about the availability of an update but I don't have the basic Distiller).

I'm unable (unwilling) to purchase a full blown Acrobat just to produce
a .pdf from a web page. All of the other options that I have seen,
using verious flavors of 'ghostscript' and such, seem way more
complicated than necessary.

Since creating a .pdf with the print process of Seamonkey still works
(until Seamonkey is 'fixed'), I'll just have to stick with that unless
someone out there knows where I can get a 'printer' for pdf's that works
with Firefox. Any hints???
--
The Frosted Flake
+------------------------ SPAM is for eating ------------------------+
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-30-2008, 09:29 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 0
Default Re: Firefox 3.0.3 vs Seamonkey 1.1.9

On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 14:08:53 -0700
Frosted_Flake wrote:

> Since creating a .pdf with the print process of Seamonkey still works
> (until Seamonkey is 'fixed'), I'll just have to stick with that
> unless someone out there knows where I can get a 'printer' for pdf's
> that works with Firefox. Any hints???


I like PDFCreator, .
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-30-2008, 11:12 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 0
Default Re: Firefox 3.0.3 vs Seamonkey 1.1.9

Frosted_Flake wrote:
> Alex K. wrote:
>> Frosted_Flake wrote:
>>> I have not upgraded Seamonkey yet but Firefox was just upgraded to 3.0.3
>>> and I now have a problem with Firefox when printing to a .pdf.
>>>
>>> I have an old faithful version of Acrobat PDF Writer that I got
>>> somewhere along the line with some hardware that I bought. Anyway,
>>> since going to 3.0.3, the PDF Writer puts out garbage.
>>>
>>> If I have a blank page (eg. about:blank) and print it from Seamonkey,
>>> the header says "about:blank" in readable characters.
>>>
>>> If I do the same thing from Firefox the header says "D ERXW  EO D Q N
>>> " with the characters overlaying each other.
>>>
>>> Both Firefox and Seamonkey have the character encoding set to Unicode
>>> (UTF-8).
>>>
>>> I don't remember this happening with an earlier version of Firefox (but
>>> I don't recall when the last time I used the PDF Writer to asve a .pdf
>>> of a page).
>>>
>>> Does anyone have any idea what is going on?
>>> More importantly, does anyone know how I can get Firefox to work correctly?
>>>
>>>

>> It appears that it is a known bug relating to Adobe PDF Writer & certain
>> printer drivers:
>>
>> "Bug 454532 - Font glyphs incorrectly displayed with certain printer
>> drivers"
>>
>> This comment contains an analysis of the problem:
>> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=454532#c3
>>
>> Its a bit long, and gets rather technical, so I'll quote the relevant,
>> user-friendly parts:
>>
>> "After reading through all these bug reports there appears to be at
>> least two separate bugs:
>>
>> 1) Firefox always prints garbage with Adobe PDF Writer. No known workaround.
>>
>> ...
>>
>> Acrobat 5 comes with two printer drivers: PDF Writer and Distiller.
>> Printing from Firefox 3 to Distiller works fine. Printing to PDF Writer
>> produces garbage.
>>
>> ...
>>
>> Possible solutions to this bug are:
>>
>> ...
>>
>> 2) Use Distiller instead of PDF Writer. And in more recent version of
>> Acrobat this is the only option."
>>
>> And for a peek at the, perhaps not-so-distant future:
>>
>> "3) Fix the remaining issues with the cairo PDF export and make this
>> available from the user interface. This is my preferred solution :-)."
>>
>> And in a follow up to that, another developer responds:
>>
>> "I agree with going with option 3 -- we should also detect PDF Writer
>> and notify the user that this isn't going to work and that they should
>> use Distiller or something. Doing this notification sounds painful,
>> though, but it's doable.
>> Also, we won't be able to fix that for firefox 3.0, would have to go
>> into 3.1.
>>
>> So, it looks like FF will get native pdf printing ability.
>>

> OK, I understand the problem butnot how to fix it. I do NOT have
> Distiller and can't seem to locate where to get it (I do see something
> about the availability of an update but I don't have the basic Distiller).
>
> I'm unable (unwilling) to purchase a full blown Acrobat just to produce
> a .pdf from a web page. All of the other options that I have seen,
> using verious flavors of 'ghostscript' and such, seem way more
> complicated than necessary.
>
> Since creating a .pdf with the print process of Seamonkey still works
> (until Seamonkey is 'fixed'), I'll just have to stick with that unless
> someone out there knows where I can get a 'printer' for pdf's that works
> with Firefox. Any hints???

Get foxit reader.
free, and about 10 times faster than acrobat.
Dont forget to de-activate acrobat browser support,
then install foxit reader.
Last, click on a pdf, and tell FF to use foxit.
I think I also deleted some acrobat dll, am not sure.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-01-2008, 02:00 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 0
Default Re: Firefox 3.0.3 vs Seamonkey 1.1.9

Sjouke Burry wrote:
> Frosted_Flake wrote:
>> Alex K. wrote:
>>> Frosted_Flake wrote:
>>>> I have not upgraded Seamonkey yet but Firefox was just upgraded to
>>>> 3.0.3 and I now have a problem with Firefox when printing to a .pdf.
>>>>
>>>> I have an old faithful version of Acrobat PDF Writer that I got
>>>> somewhere along the line with some hardware that I bought. Anyway,
>>>> since going to 3.0.3, the PDF Writer puts out garbage.
>>>>
>>>> If I have a blank page (eg. about:blank) and print it from
>>>> Seamonkey, the header says "about:blank" in readable characters.
>>>>
>>>> If I do the same thing from Firefox the header says "D ERXW  EO D Q N
>>>> " with the characters overlaying each other.
>>>>
>>>> Both Firefox and Seamonkey have the character encoding set to
>>>> Unicode (UTF-8).
>>>>
>>>> I don't remember this happening with an earlier version of Firefox
>>>> (but I don't recall when the last time I used the PDF Writer to asve
>>>> a .pdf of a page).
>>>>
>>>> Does anyone have any idea what is going on?
>>>> More importantly, does anyone know how I can get Firefox to work
>>>> correctly?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> It appears that it is a known bug relating to Adobe PDF Writer & certain
>>> printer drivers:
>>>
>>> "Bug 454532 - Font glyphs incorrectly displayed with certain printer
>>> drivers"
>>>
>>> This comment contains an analysis of the problem:
>>> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=454532#c3
>>>
>>> Its a bit long, and gets rather technical, so I'll quote the relevant,
>>> user-friendly parts:
>>>
>>> "After reading through all these bug reports there appears to be at
>>> least two separate bugs:
>>>
>>> 1) Firefox always prints garbage with Adobe PDF Writer. No known
>>> workaround.
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>> Acrobat 5 comes with two printer drivers: PDF Writer and Distiller.
>>> Printing from Firefox 3 to Distiller works fine. Printing to PDF Writer
>>> produces garbage.
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>> Possible solutions to this bug are:
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>> 2) Use Distiller instead of PDF Writer. And in more recent version of
>>> Acrobat this is the only option."
>>>
>>> And for a peek at the, perhaps not-so-distant future:
>>>
>>> "3) Fix the remaining issues with the cairo PDF export and make this
>>> available from the user interface. This is my preferred solution :-)."
>>>
>>> And in a follow up to that, another developer responds:
>>>
>>> "I agree with going with option 3 -- we should also detect PDF Writer
>>> and notify the user that this isn't going to work and that they should
>>> use Distiller or something. Doing this notification sounds painful,
>>> though, but it's doable.
>>> Also, we won't be able to fix that for firefox 3.0, would have to go
>>> into 3.1.
>>>
>>> So, it looks like FF will get native pdf printing ability.
>>>

>> OK, I understand the problem butnot how to fix it. I do NOT have
>> Distiller and can't seem to locate where to get it (I do see something
>> about the availability of an update but I don't have the basic
>> Distiller).
>>
>> I'm unable (unwilling) to purchase a full blown Acrobat just to
>> produce a .pdf from a web page. All of the other options that I have
>> seen, using verious flavors of 'ghostscript' and such, seem way more
>> complicated than necessary.
>>
>> Since creating a .pdf with the print process of Seamonkey still works
>> (until Seamonkey is 'fixed'), I'll just have to stick with that unless
>> someone out there knows where I can get a 'printer' for pdf's that
>> works with Firefox. Any hints???

> Get foxit reader.
> free, and about 10 times faster than acrobat.
> Dont forget to de-activate acrobat browser support,
> then install foxit reader.
> Last, click on a pdf, and tell FF to use foxit.
> I think I also deleted some acrobat dll, am not sure.

Foxit shows the same problem. The problem is NOT with reading a .pdf,
it is in CREATING the .pdf.

I already use Foxit Reader as my primary .pdf reading/displaying
application.


--
The Frosted Flake
+------------------------ SPAM is for eating ------------------------+
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-01-2008, 03:24 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 0
Default Re: Firefox 3.0.3 vs Seamonkey 1.1.9

Frosted_Flake wrote:

>>

> OK, I understand the problem butnot how to fix it. I do NOT have
> Distiller and can't seem to locate where to get it (I do see something
> about the availability of an update but I don't have the basic Distiller).
>
> I'm unable (unwilling) to purchase a full blown Acrobat just to produce
> a .pdf from a web page. All of the other options that I have seen,
> using verious flavors of 'ghostscript' and such, seem way more
> complicated than necessary.
>
> Since creating a .pdf with the print process of Seamonkey still works
> (until Seamonkey is 'fixed'), I'll just have to stick with that unless
> someone out there knows where I can get a 'printer' for pdf's that works
> with Firefox. Any hints???


I use Primo PDF download free from http://www.primopdf.com/
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What about firefox/seamonkey on DSL? unix Mozilla 5 03-10-2008 04:50 AM
Re: Seamonkey vs Firefox? unix Mozilla 5 03-09-2008 09:13 AM
Seamonkey vs Firefox? unix Mozilla 13 03-08-2008 06:35 PM
Availability of Firefox 1.5.0.9, Firefox 2.0.0.1 and Seamonkey 1.0.7 unix Aix 5 10-04-2007 12:38 AM
Seamonkey vs. Firefox 1.5 unix Mozilla 5 04-26-2006 09:16 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:37 AM.