Lars-Erik Østerud wrote:
> Have tried to update my minimal skin (userChrome.css) to work with the
> 3.0 beta (Minefield), but it wasn't easy. Why do you change the names
> of element, remove name for elements (that still exist w/o name) etc?

I don't know the answer to the specific questions, but the developers
usually do changes, because they think the end result is better.
Breaking compatibility with older versions is hardly ever welcomed, but
if it isn't done, we would just have a browser which wouldn't ever improve.

--
Solutions for issues with Firefox:
http://kb.mozillazine.org/Category:Issues_%28Firefox%29

Aggro wrote:

> Breaking compatibility with older versions is hardly ever welcomed, but
> if it isn't done, we would just have a browser which wouldn't ever improve.

But removing "node" names for elements that are still there (so that
they can't be uniqly identified and accessed) and changing names of
other "nodes" (that are still there) doesn't add anything at all?

Just makes confusion (and CSS code need to support both FF2 and 3)
--
Lars-Erik - http://www.osterud.name - ICQ 7297605
My Firefox tweaks: http://osterud.name/firefox.html