mike hudon wrote:

> why do I get empty squares whit no pictures and a red dot

T'would be nice to get more specifics, but try:

Tools>>Options>>Privacy

Select the General tab. Uncheck Block loading of remote images....

Lee

--
Leonidas Jones, Mozilla/Netscape Champion
Learn about the Champs! http://mozillachampions.ufaq.org
The UFAQ'S http://www.ufaq.org/
http://www.mozilla.org/community/etiquette.html
http://mozilla.com http://mozilla.org

Leonidas Jones wrote:
> mike hudon wrote:
>
>> why do I get empty squares whit no pictures and a red dot
>
> T'would be nice to get more specifics, but try:
>
> Tools>>Options>>Privacy
>
> Select the General tab. Uncheck Block loading of remote images....
>
> Lee
>
it is uncheck I do get pictures but some are empty whit a red dot what
else can I tell you

--
golf forever

mike hudon wrote:
> Leonidas Jones wrote:
>> mike hudon wrote:
>>
>>> why do I get empty squares whit no pictures and a red dot
>>
>> T'would be nice to get more specifics, but try:
>>
>> Tools>>Options>>Privacy
>>
>> Select the General tab. Uncheck Block loading of remote images....
>>
>> Lee
>>
> it is uncheck I do get pictures but some are empty whit a red dot
> what else can I tell you
>
See this article :
http://kb.mozillazine.org/Images_in_..._do_not_appear

Nir wrote:
> mike hudon wrote:
>> Leonidas Jones wrote:
>>> mike hudon wrote:
>>>
>>>> why do I get empty squares whit no pictures and a red dot
>>>
>>> T'would be nice to get more specifics, but try:
>>>
>>> Tools>>Options>>Privacy
>>>
>>> Select the General tab. Uncheck Block loading of remote images....
>>>
>>> Lee
>>>
>> it is uncheck I do get pictures but some are empty whit a red dot
>> what else can I tell you
>>
> See this article :
> http://kb.mozillazine.org/Images_in_..._do_not_appear

Seamonkey implements it much better don't you think?

moz flyer wrote:
> Nir wrote:
>> mike hudon wrote:
>>> Leonidas Jones wrote:
>>>> mike hudon wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> why do I get empty squares whit no pictures and a red dot
>>>>
>>>> T'would be nice to get more specifics, but try:
>>>>
>>>> Tools>>Options>>Privacy
>>>>
>>>> Select the General tab. Uncheck Block loading of remote images....
>>>>
>>>> Lee
>>>>
>>> it is uncheck I do get pictures but some are empty whit a red dot
>>> what else can I tell you
>>>
>> See this article :
>> http://kb.mozillazine.org/Images_in_..._do_not_appear
>
> Seamonkey implements it much better don't you think?

first you say TB 2.xa was the best, then you went to TB 1.0.8, now
you're saying SM is the best. Which is it?

--
"Oh! Heavens to Murgatroid. Exit, Stage Left!" -- Snagglepuss
http://www.toonopedia.com/snaggle.htm

Please do not email me for help. Reply to the newsgroup only. Thanks

Snagglepuss wrote:
> moz flyer wrote:
>> Nir wrote:
>>> mike hudon wrote:
>>>> Leonidas Jones wrote:
>>>>> mike hudon wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> why do I get empty squares whit no pictures and a red dot
>>>>>
>>>>> T'would be nice to get more specifics, but try:
>>>>>
>>>>> Tools>>Options>>Privacy
>>>>>
>>>>> Select the General tab. Uncheck Block loading of remote
>>>>> images....
>>>>>
>>>>> Lee
>>>>>
>>>> it is uncheck I do get pictures but some are empty whit a red
>>>> dot what else can I tell you
>>>>
>>> See this article :
>>> http://kb.mozillazine.org/Images_in_..._do_not_appear
>>
>> Seamonkey implements it much better don't you think?
>
> first you say TB 2.xa was the best, then you went to TB 1.0.8, now
> you're saying SM is the best. Which is it?
>
'Snagglepuss' , please see Lee's suggestion :
http://groups.google.com/group/mozil...af300b6d14cd22

Nir wrote:
> Snagglepuss wrote:
>> moz flyer wrote:
>>> Nir wrote:
>>>> mike hudon wrote:
>>>>> Leonidas Jones wrote:
>>>>>> mike hudon wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> why do I get empty squares whit no pictures and a red dot
>>>>>>
>>>>>> T'would be nice to get more specifics, but try:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tools>>Options>>Privacy
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Select the General tab. Uncheck Block loading of remote
>>>>>> images....
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Lee
>>>>>>
>>>>> it is uncheck I do get pictures but some are empty whit a red
>>>>> dot what else can I tell you
>>>>>
>>>> See this article :
>>>> http://kb.mozillazine.org/Images_in_..._do_not_appear
>>>
>>> Seamonkey implements it much better don't you think?
>>
>> first you say TB 2.xa was the best, then you went to TB 1.0.8, now
>> you're saying SM is the best. Which is it?
>>
> 'Snagglepuss' , please see Lee's suggestion :
> http://groups.google.com/group/mozil...af300b6d14cd22
well, I could say the same thing about your post:
http://groups.google.com/group/mozil...4349bc6af7c39c,
but I won't

--
"Oh! Heavens to Murgatroid. Exit, Stage Left!" -- Snagglepuss
http://www.toonopedia.com/snaggle.htm

Please do not email me for help. Reply to the newsgroup only. Thanks

Snagglepuss wrote:
> Nir wrote:
>> Snagglepuss wrote:
>>> moz flyer wrote:
>>>> Nir wrote:
>>>>> mike hudon wrote:
>>>>>> Leonidas Jones wrote:
>>>>>>> mike hudon wrote:

>> 'Snagglepuss' , please see Lee's suggestion :
>> http://groups.google.com/group/mozil...af300b6d14cd22
>>
>>
> well, I could say the same thing about your post:
> http://groups.google.com/group/mozil...4349bc6af7c39c,
> but I won't
>

Thanks for your consideration Snagglepuss. and if you check it the time
of two messages you will find that i have posted message 6minutes before
Lee did. Actually i want to make others aware about 'a fact'

Nir wrote:
> Snagglepuss wrote:
>> Nir wrote:
>>> Snagglepuss wrote:
>>>> moz flyer wrote:
>>>>> Nir wrote:
>>>>>> mike hudon wrote:
>>>>>>> Leonidas Jones wrote:
>>>>>>>> mike hudon wrote:
>
>>> 'Snagglepuss' , please see Lee's suggestion :
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/mozil...af300b6d14cd22
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> well, I could say the same thing about your post:
>> http://groups.google.com/group/mozil...4349bc6af7c39c,
>>
>> but I won't
>>
>
> Thanks for your consideration Snagglepuss. and if you check it the time
> of two messages you will find that i have posted message 6minutes before
> Lee did. Actually i want to make others aware about 'a fact'

What fact Nir?

The fact that people here only know about the application UI and nothing
about code behind it.

Nir wrote:
> Snagglepuss wrote:
>> Nir wrote:
>>> Snagglepuss wrote:
>>>> moz flyer wrote:
>>>>> Nir wrote:
>>>>>> mike hudon wrote:
>>>>>>> Leonidas Jones wrote:
>>>>>>>> mike hudon wrote:
>
>>> 'Snagglepuss' , please see Lee's suggestion :
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/mozil...af300b6d14cd22
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> well, I could say the same thing about your post:
>> http://groups.google.com/group/mozil...4349bc6af7c39c,
>>
>> but I won't
>>
>
> Thanks for your consideration Snagglepuss. and if you check it the time
> of two messages you will find that i have posted message 6minutes before
> Lee did. Actually i want to make others aware about 'a fact'

What "fact?" That some posters here have hostilities towards other posters

--
"Oh! Heavens to Murgatroid. Exit, Stage Left!" -- Snagglepuss
http://www.toonopedia.com/snaggle.htm

Please do not email me for help. Reply to the newsgroup only. Thanks

Snagglepuss wrote:
> Nir wrote:
>> Snagglepuss wrote:
>>> Nir wrote:
>>>> Snagglepuss wrote:
>>>>> moz flyer wrote:
>>>>>> Nir wrote:
>>>>>>> mike hudon wrote:
>>>>>>>> Leonidas Jones wrote:
>>>>>>>>> mike hudon wrote:
>>
>>>> 'Snagglepuss' , please see Lee's suggestion :
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/mozil...af300b6d14cd22
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> well, I could say the same thing about your post:
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/mozil...4349bc6af7c39c,
>>>
>>> but I won't
>>>
>>
>> Thanks for your consideration Snagglepuss. and if you check it the time
>> of two messages you will find that i have posted message 6minutes before
>> Lee did. Actually i want to make others aware about 'a fact'
>
> What "fact?" That some posters here have hostilities towards other posters
>
That you can deny a person participation by ignoring them. pfft

On 2006-12-20 01:02 (-0700 UTC), moz flyer wrote:



> [ . . . P]eople here only know about the application UI and nothing
> about code behind it.

Here, go nuts:
;
.

Or check out from CVS:

(substituting the appropriate product). But, under Windows, you'll need cygwin.

BTW, which part of 'end-user support' confuses you?

/b.

--
'There is caution, and there is irrational paranoia.' -- Ron Hunter

On 20/12/2006 09:47, CET - what odd quirk of fate caused moz flyer to
generate the following:? :
> Snagglepuss wrote:
>
>> Nir wrote:
>>
>>> Snagglepuss wrote:
>>>
>>>> Nir wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Snagglepuss wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> moz flyer wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nir wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> mike hudon wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Leonidas Jones wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> mike hudon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> 'Snagglepuss' , please see Lee's suggestion :
>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/mozil...af300b6d14cd22
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> well, I could say the same thing about your post:
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/mozil...4349bc6af7c39c,
>>>>
>>>> but I won't
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Thanks for your consideration Snagglepuss. and if you check it the time
>>> of two messages you will find that i have posted message 6minutes before
>>> Lee did. Actually i want to make others aware about 'a fact'
>>>
>> What "fact?" That some posters here have hostilities towards other posters
>>
>>
> That you can deny a person participation by ignoring them. pfft
>
"to participate" means to take part in, to submit helpful and/or
reasonable suggestions!

GARTH - when did *YOU* submit a reasonable suggestion since trolling
these groups ??
*NEVER* because you are unknowlegable and plain STUPID - you don't even
understand the difference between an OS and an Application!

reg

reg

squaredancer wrote:
> On 20/12/2006 09:47, CET - what odd quirk of fate caused moz flyer to
> generate the following:? :
>> Snagglepuss wrote:
>>
>>> Nir wrote:
>>>
>>>> Snagglepuss wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Nir wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Snagglepuss wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> moz flyer wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Nir wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> mike hudon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Leonidas Jones wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> mike hudon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> 'Snagglepuss' , please see Lee's suggestion :
>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/mozil...af300b6d14cd22
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> well, I could say the same thing about your post:
>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/mozil...4349bc6af7c39c,
>>>>>
>>>>> but I won't
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Thanks for your consideration Snagglepuss. and if you check it the time
>>>> of two messages you will find that i have posted message 6minutes
>>>> before
>>>> Lee did. Actually i want to make others aware about 'a fact'
>>>>
>>> What "fact?" That some posters here have hostilities towards other
>>> posters
>>>
>>>
>> That you can deny a person participation by ignoring them. pfft
>>
> "to participate" means to take part in, to submit helpful and/or
> reasonable suggestions!
>
> GARTH - when did *YOU* submit a reasonable suggestion since trolling
> these groups ??
> *NEVER* because you are unknowlegable and plain STUPID - you don't even
> understand the difference between an OS and an Application!
>
> reg
>
> reg

jokes on you brother