Seamonkey vs. Firefox 1.5 - Mozilla
This is a discussion on Seamonkey vs. Firefox 1.5 - Mozilla ; I'm currently still running Mozilla v1.7.12. A website I use has a feature which works correctly with IE, but not with Mozilla v1.7.12. The site's author says it works properly with Firefox v1.5, and believes the problem is due to ...
| | LinkBack | Tools |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| feature which works correctly with IE, but not with Mozilla v1.7.12. The site's author says it works properly with Firefox v1.5, and believes the problem is due to a problem with Javascript support in the older browser. I use Mozilla for both web browsing and mail/news, and I would prefer to stay with an integrated suite rather than Firefox/Thunderbird. My question: Is Seamonkey v1.0.1 based on Mozilla v1.7 or on Firefox v1.5? Thanks! John -- Q: What's the quickest way to get a mailbox full of spam? A: Post a message in ANY newsgroup using a real email address. Please reply in this newsgroup. Thank you. |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| John wrote: > I'm currently still running Mozilla v1.7.12. A website I use has a > feature which works correctly with IE, but not with Mozilla v1.7.12. The > site's author says it works properly with Firefox v1.5, and believes the > problem is due to a problem with Javascript support in the older browser. > > I use Mozilla for both web browsing and mail/news, and I would prefer to > stay with an integrated suite rather than Firefox/Thunderbird. My > question: Is Seamonkey v1.0.1 based on Mozilla v1.7 or on Firefox v1.5? > > Thanks! > > John SeaMonkey 1.0.1 uses the same Gecko Runtime Engine (GRE) as Firefox 1.5.0.2 so what works in FF 1.5.0.2 should also work in SM 1.0.1. SeaMonkey 1.0.1 and Firefox 1.5.0.2 are both based on GRE 1.8.0.2. -- Brian | REMOVE NOSPAM To E-Mail me .. http://www.mozilla.org | http://ilias.ca/mozilla/ | http://ilias.ca/ .. No keyboard found. Press F1 to continue. .. Internet "Help" Desk: http://www.deadtroll.com/video/helldeskcable.html |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Brian J. Graham wrote: > John wrote: > >> I'm currently still running Mozilla v1.7.12. A website I use has a >> feature which works correctly with IE, but not with Mozilla v1.7.12. >> The site's author says it works properly with Firefox v1.5, and >> believes the problem is due to a problem with Javascript support in >> the older browser. >> >> I use Mozilla for both web browsing and mail/news, and I would prefer >> to stay with an integrated suite rather than Firefox/Thunderbird. My >> question: Is Seamonkey v1.0.1 based on Mozilla v1.7 or on Firefox v1.5? >> >> Thanks! >> >> John > > > SeaMonkey 1.0.1 uses the same Gecko Runtime Engine (GRE) as Firefox > 1.5.0.2 so what works in FF 1.5.0.2 should also work in SM 1.0.1. > > SeaMonkey 1.0.1 and Firefox 1.5.0.2 are both based on GRE 1.8.0.2. > That's EXACTLY what I wanted to know. Thanks very much! John -- Q: What's the quickest way to get a mailbox full of spam? A: Post a message in any newsgroup using a real email address. Please reply in this newsgroup. Thank you. |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| John wrote: > Brian J. Graham wrote: > > >>John wrote: >> >> >>>I'm currently still running Mozilla v1.7.12. A website I use has a >>>feature which works correctly with IE, but not with Mozilla v1.7.12. >>>The site's author says it works properly with Firefox v1.5, and >>>believes the problem is due to a problem with Javascript support in >>>the older browser. >>> >>>I use Mozilla for both web browsing and mail/news, and I would prefer >>>to stay with an integrated suite rather than Firefox/Thunderbird. My >>>question: Is Seamonkey v1.0.1 based on Mozilla v1.7 or on Firefox v1.5? >>> >>>Thanks! >>> >>>John >> >> >>SeaMonkey 1.0.1 uses the same Gecko Runtime Engine (GRE) as Firefox >>1.5.0.2 so what works in FF 1.5.0.2 should also work in SM 1.0.1. >> >>SeaMonkey 1.0.1 and Firefox 1.5.0.2 are both based on GRE 1.8.0.2. >> > > That's EXACTLY what I wanted to know. Thanks very much! > > John how about posting a link to the site so others can go and check it out and see whats going on. Maybe someone can recommend changes. There's one or two experts on javascript that pops in once in a while. -- Things to Ponder about: If the professor on Gilligan's Island can make a radio out of a coconut, why can't he fix a hole in a boat? |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| gwtc wrote: >>> John wrote: >>> >>> >>>> I'm currently still running Mozilla v1.7.12. A website I use has a >>>> feature which works correctly with IE, but not with Mozilla v1.7.12. >>>> The site's author says it works properly with Firefox v1.5, and >>>> believes the problem is due to a problem with Javascript support in >>>> the older browser. >>>> > > how about posting a link to the site so others can go and check it out > and see whats going on. Maybe someone can recommend changes. There's > one or two experts on javascript that pops in once in a while. > The Pathfinder Web Client, available via http://www.dxlabsuite.com/pathfinder/WebClient/ lets you type a callsign once and then search multiple web sites for QSL information with one mouse click per site. It can search 11 sites that provide information for callsigns from many countries, and it can search more than 70 country-specific online callbooks. The Pathfinder Web Client now provides an indication of whether a country-specific callbook is available as you type into its Target Callsign textbox. When the Target Callsign textbox is empty, the country-specific callbook search button is labeled "CBA: ?", and clicking it has no effect. As you type a callsign into the Target Callsign box, the Pathfinder Web Client attempts to identify the callsign's DXCC entity. If the entity is identified and a country-specific callbook is available, the country-specific callbook search button is labeled with the callsign's country's DXCC prefix. Typing VK9NS into the Target Callsign box, for example, will produce a "CBA: VK" button that when clicked will search the Australian online callbook. -- Q: What's the quickest way to get a mailbox full of spam? A: Post a message in any newsgroup using a real email address. Please reply in this newsgroup. Thank you. |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| John wrote: > I'm currently still running Mozilla v1.7.12. A website I use has a > feature which works correctly with IE, but not with Mozilla v1.7.12. > The site's author says it works properly with Firefox v1.5, and > believes the problem is due to a problem with Javascript support in > the older browser. > > I use Mozilla for both web browsing and mail/news, and I would prefer > to stay with an integrated suite rather than Firefox/Thunderbird. My > question: Is Seamonkey v1.0.1 based on Mozilla v1.7 or on Firefox v1.5? no. Both use the same rendering engine, at least in theory, but it's not really "based on" as most people would think of it. I have noticed, however, that Firefox will render sites which Seamonkey 1.0.1 will not. I used the "report a broken page" feature, hopefully that will result in a fix. Since the symptom was a total crash of SM and all windows, and I was an hour into a file download, I did NOT bookmark the page. I assume the developers will have it. -- -bill davidsen (davidsen@tmr.com) "Strange it is that SCO was a direct beneficiary of the effort by IBM to contribute technology to Linux. And they killed their own goose. It may not have been golden. But it was a goose. Now all they have is a dead bird. And when these cases finish up by eating the meat off the carcass, the bones will be buried somewhere. Or simply discarded out back." -groklaw, Jan 24, 2005 |
« Previous Thread
|
Next Thread »
| Tools | |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Firefox 3.0.3 vs Seamonkey 1.1.9 | unix | Mozilla | 7 | 10-01-2008 03:24 AM |
| What about firefox/seamonkey on DSL? | unix | Mozilla | 5 | 03-10-2008 04:50 AM |
| Re: Seamonkey vs Firefox? | unix | Mozilla | 5 | 03-09-2008 09:13 AM |
| Seamonkey vs Firefox? | unix | Mozilla | 13 | 03-08-2008 06:35 PM |
| Availability of Firefox 1.5.0.9, Firefox 2.0.0.1 and Seamonkey 1.0.7 | unix | Aix | 5 | 10-04-2007 12:38 AM |
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:39 AM.
