Geoffrey Young wrote:
>> I realize this is "devish" but I wanted the larger audience for testing.
>>
>> I'd appreciate a sanity check from other members of our community. If it looks good, I think we can
>> roll 0.92-RC1 and then 0.92 RELEASE and save the mp1/mp2 split for 0.93.

>
> sounds reasonable - the API is currently broken, right?

I was not aware of anything thats broken currently.

> the changes you outlined in your other mail seem reasonable, namely
> pulling out common code to a common lib and making the handlers target
> specific. I'm actually liking this idea more and more, as distributing
> Apache::SL and Apache2::SL in the same package solves a lot of the
> Makefile tricks we'd need to come up with while not requiring changes by
> folks already migrated to mp2.

Ditto.

--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Philip M. Gollucci (pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) 323.219.4708
Consultant / http://p6m7g8.net/Resume/resume.shtml
Senior Software Engineer - TicketMaster - http://ticketmaster.com
1024D/A79997FA F357 0FDD 2301 6296 690F 6A47 D55A 7172 A799 97F

"In all that I've done wrong I know I must have done something right to
deserve a hug every morning and butterfly kisses at night."
__ ___ ___ ____ __
/ |/ /_ __/ __/ __ \/ /
/ /|_/ / // /\ \/ /_/ / /__
/_/ /_/\_, /___/\___\_\___/
<___/