Enno wrote:
> in my experience, Class:BI is slow and a memory hog, allthough I must
> admit that those problems might be related to the implementation of the
> app that uses Class:BI here, instead of CDBI itself...


Of course it's slow compared to just using DBI. Any ORM would be. I
doubt it uses significantly more memory though.

Rose:B::Object and DBIx::Class make more efficient use of database
calls than Class:BI does. You can see a benchmark written by the
Rose:B::Object author here:
http://rose.sourceforge.net/wiki/ind...RDBO/Benchmark

- Perrin