On Tuesday 09 May 2006 20:34, Jonathan Vanasco wrote:
> On May 9, 2006, at 5:30 AM, Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote:
> > First of all, is it the intended behavior that libapreq2 should die
> > under these circumstances?

>
> yes.
>
> > If yes, are we supposed to deal with this by
> > putting each read of a cookie in an eval block?

>
> yes.


OK.

> Both are in the docs. =A0I had no idea either a few months ago.


Uh, right. I hadn't read that carefully enough. Sorry. We could use=20
better exception handling here... :-)

=2D-=20
Kjetil Kjernsmo
Information Systems Developer
Opera Software ASA