On May 9, 2006, at 5:30 AM, Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote:

> First of all, is it the intended behavior that libapreq2 should die
> under these circumstances?

yes.

> If yes, are we supposed to deal with this by
> putting each read of a cookie in an eval block?

yes.

Both are in the docs. I had no idea either a few months ago.

The issue that i've come up with, is that some malformed cookies will
cause a segault when parsed. I'm hoping that the next libapreq will
fix that.