|
#1
| |||
| |||
| I want to port JVM to Minix. Is anybody already working on it? And which JVM should I port? Suggestions please ! |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Siddharth Prakash Singh > Hey all, > I want to port JVM to Minix. Is anybody already working on it? Not that _I_ know of, but it could be > And which JVM should I port? Suggestions please ! AST has on occasion suggested Kaffe (www.kaffe.org). I don't know the details of this preference, but it's a clean implementation from scratch, which will probably make it easier to port than Sun's code. Regards, Jens -- Jens de Smit Student Computer Science | Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam jfdsmit@few.vu.nl | http://www.few.vu.nl/~jfdsmit "[In the end, people] get furious at IT that the goddamn magic isn't working" -- Stewart Dean |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| On Oct 30, 6:02*am, Siddharth Prakash Singh > Hey all, > > I want to port JVM to Minix. Is anybody already working on *it? > > And which JVM should I port? Suggestions please ! Hi Siddharth! Quick question...have you ported anything this big before? Just curious. A JVM is a large piece of code. I agree with Jens that Kaffe should probably be the JVM of choice. I actually started working on a port of Kaffe 1.0.7 last year about this time. Got it to build, but the code output from the java compiler wasn't correct and, sad to say, I let my port rot in favor of other things. I am not sure of the state of the code, but it is still sitting on my dev Minix system. (Uptime 309 days, 3 hours 18 minutes!) There are probably newer versions out there by now if you want to take on the port. I haven't seen any new port announcements in awhile, so it would be good to have some fresh toys to play with. It is getting close to the holiday season here, so I might even pull off another port or two before year end! Anyway, on the subject of Kaffe, if you want to take it on, I say go for it! If you think I can be of assistance, feel free to e-mail me. The Grue - James T. Sprinkle http://www.myspace.com/jamestsprinkle |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| On Oct 31, 2:20*am, The-G...@hotmail.com wrote: > On Oct 30, 6:02*am, Siddharth Prakash Singh > > > Hey all, > > > I want to port JVM to Minix. Is anybody already working on *it? > > > And which JVM should I port? Suggestions please ! > > Hi Siddharth! *Quick question...have you ported anything this big > before? *Just curious. *A JVM is a large piece of code. *I agree with > Jens that Kaffe should probably be the JVM of choice. *I actually > started working on a port of Kaffe 1.0.7 last year about this time. > Got it to build, but the code output from the java compiler wasn't > correct and, sad to say, I let my port rot in favor of other things. > I am not sure of the state of the code, but it is still sitting on my > dev Minix system. *(Uptime 309 days, 3 hours 18 minutes!) *There are > probably newer versions out there by now if you want to take on the > port. *I haven't seen any new port announcements in awhile, so it > would be good to have some fresh toys to play with. *It is getting > close to the holiday season here, so I might even pull off another > port or two before year end! *Anyway, on the subject of Kaffe, if you > want to take it on, I say go for it! *If you think I can be of > assistance, feel free to e-mail me. > > The Grue - James T. Sprinklehttp://www.myspace.com/jamestsprinkle Has anyone considered JNODE for this? I has explored it a long time ago - its basically a complete OS built in JAVA - ofcourse it has a JVM written in Java as well!!!...This could potentially be an easier port! |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| kashyap > Has anyone considered JNODE for this? I has explored it a long time > ago - its basically a complete OS built in JAVA - ofcourse it has a > JVM written in Java as well!!!...This could potentially be an easier > port! Exactly why would this be _easier_? From a quick glance, all I can say about the project is that it looks as if everything is in Java bytecode except for the nano-kernel and a few architecture-specific classes. From the site: "After the bootstrapper code, we're running plain java code.". So, JNode's java interpreter/JIT compiler/whatever is running on bare hardware, not as a process. JNode's JVM runs on top of this, as pure Java. What we need for MINIX is a program that runs as a user process and functions as an intermediary between a Java bytecode program and MINIX. I could be missing something here, but I don't think JNode will be useful in the effort to get Minix a working JVM. Regards, Jens -- Jens de Smit Student Computer Science | Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam jfdsmit@few.vu.nl | http://www.few.vu.nl/~jfdsmit "[In the end, people] get furious at IT that the goddamn magic isn't working" -- Stewart Dean |
![]() |
« Previous Thread
|
Next Thread »
| Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| porting | unix | Openssl | 0 | 04-08-2008 05:58 PM |
| X86 BSP Porting | unix | VxWorks | 0 | 11-24-2007 07:58 AM |
| porting help | unix | SGI | 0 | 10-05-2007 09:09 AM |
| Porting Z/OS to AIX | unix | Aix | 2 | 10-04-2007 12:57 AM |
| Porting | unix | Windows CE | 1 | 10-01-2007 01:33 PM |
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:31 AM.




