4321 - Test Post - Please Ignore - Mandrake
This is a discussion on 4321 - Test Post - Please Ignore - Mandrake ; left_coast wrote:
> Bill Pfeifer wrote:
>
> > left_coast wrote:
> >> SD Tester wrote:
> >>
> >>> 4321 - Test Post - Please Ignore
> >>
> >> Welcome to the group. If your test post was ...
-
Re: 4321 - Test Post - Please Ignore
left_coast wrote:
> Bill Pfeifer wrote:
>
> > left_coast wrote:
> >> SD Tester wrote:
> >>
> >>> 4321 - Test Post - Please Ignore
> >>
> >> Welcome to the group. If your test post was intended for
> >> alt.os.linux.mandrake it was indeed successful. Regretfully there are
> >> those that will tell a lie [1][2] and say that it failed. I suggest you
> >> consider for yourself why someone would claim a successful post is a
> >> failure and judge there comments accordingly.
> >>
> >> [1] The defintion I use for "tell a lie" is:
> >>
> >> http://dictionary.cambridge.org/defi...1791&dict=CALD
> >>
> >> "tell a lie/lies
> >> to say something/things that are not true"
> >>
> >> Anyone that claims I meant anything other than "to say something/things
> >> that are not true" is not being truthful. Note the definition I use does
> >> NOT REQUIRE deceit either intended or otherwise.
> >>
> >> [2] The definition I use for "lie" is:
> >>
> >> "lie
> >> noun [C]
> >> something that you say which you know is not true"
> >>
> >> Again anyone that claims I meant something other than "something that you
> >> say which you know is not true" is not being truthful. Note I use the
> >> NOUN form of lie, NOT THE VERB, anyone trying to claim that I used the
> >> verb form is trying to claim I said something I did not. Again, the
> >> definition I use does not require deceit either intended or otherwise.
> >> Again, I suggest you consider why someone would do such a thing and judge
> >> their posts accordingly.
> >>
> >> I used "tell a lie" to impart a specific meaning, I included the
> >> clarifications here because there are those that try to claim I am saying
> >> something I am not saying.
> >
> > Has anybody ever told you how incredibly boring you are?
>
> Then don't read what I have to say. The simple fact is, I am correct in what
> I say. It is regrettable that you feel the need to make this about
> something other than the message at hand, there are way to many people
> already here doing just that. And yes, it is boring trying to constantly
> correct the miss-information spread by my detractors.
> --
> In prep for a move and the need to be more mobile, I have changed my usenet
> server. If anyone has any filters based on my posting host, you should
> update them now.
Ah, yes, of course you're correct.
You're always correct.
You cannot ever be incorrect.
But you're still incredibly boring.
-
Re: 4321 - Test Post - Please Ignore
On Tuesday 05 December 2006 22:30, billpfeifer@hotmail.com stood up and
addressed the masses in /alt.os.linux.mandrake/ as follows...:
> left_coast wrote:
>
>> Then don't read what I have to say. The simple fact is, I am correct in
>> what I say. It is regrettable that you feel the need to make this about
>> something other than the message at hand, there are way to many people
>> already here doing just that. And yes, it is boring trying to constantly
>> correct the miss-information spread by my detractors.
>> --
>> In prep for a move and the need to be more mobile, I have changed my
>> usenet server. If anyone has any filters based on my posting host, you
>> should update them now.
>
> Ah, yes, of course you're correct.
> You're always correct.
> You cannot ever be incorrect.
>
> But you're still incredibly boring.
Careful now, or he'll send a couple of complaints to your ISP, accusing you
of spamming and of breaching the /Netiquette./
Believe me, I know what I'm talking about... ;-)
--
With kind regards,
*Aragorn*
(registered GNU/Linux user #223157)
-
Re: [OT] 4321 - Test Post - Please Ignore
On 5 Dec 2006 13:30:55 -0800, billpfeifer@hotmail.com wrote:
Please trim your posts. Some people are on dial up and/or have to pay
by the byte. 
>
> Ah, yes, of course you're correct.
> You're always correct.
> You cannot ever be incorrect.
Just a cautionary FYI. You may want to be very careful with left_coast.
left_coast has ways of taking care of people he does not like.
matt_left_coast, left_coast, has been cyber stalking me for for over a year, 
so feel free to take the following with a grain of salt.
Sorry for the long urls.
If you are to continue dialog with left_coast you might want to plug this
lau1j3-35i.ln1@alta.sierrandays.org
in the Message ID: box at
http://groups.google.com/advanced_group_search
Knowing that, you can research his tactics in this thread
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.o...3f1a125921d989
Now, here is the /kicker/. Several of a Usenet group regulars were getting
fed up with his trolling posts and one of our very helpful regulars
put forth a thread to amend the newsgroup's
New Users - FAQ for alt.os.linux.mandrake/mandriva
document.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.o...b376278b811700
Left_coast immediately fired off at least 2 abuse reports within about
24 hours +/- processing time for all envolved.
As I misunderstand it, 1'st abuse report was a spam report and the
2'nd was "Subject line" breach of etiquette.
Thread started about 10:22, left_coast sent an abuse report, abuse dept
contacted Aragorn, he responded to abuse dept email, and at 11:22 posted
about left_coast's /backstabbing/ *dastardly* attempt to have him silenced.
At post 38, we see left_coast posting from a Usenet server which does
not provide his ip address and with an Acceptable Use Policy which
lets him get away with just about anything.
Proceed at your own risk. 
-
Re: [OT] 4321 - Test Post - Please Ignore
Bit Twister wrote:
> On 5 Dec 2006 13:30:55 -0800, billpfeifer@hotmail.com wrote:
>
> Please trim your posts. Some people are on dial up and/or have to pay
> by the byte. 
>
>> Ah, yes, of course you're correct.
>> You're always correct.
>> You cannot ever be incorrect.
>
>
> Just a cautionary FYI. You may want to be very careful with left_coast.
> left_coast has ways of taking care of people he does not like.
>
> matt_left_coast, left_coast, has been cyber stalking me for for over a year, 
> so feel free to take the following with a grain of salt.
> Sorry for the long urls.
>
>
> If you are to continue dialog with left_coast you might want to plug this
> lau1j3-35i.ln1@alta.sierrandays.org
> in the Message ID: box at
> http://groups.google.com/advanced_group_search
>
> Knowing that, you can research his tactics in this thread
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.o...3f1a125921d989
>
> Now, here is the /kicker/. Several of a Usenet group regulars were getting
> fed up with his trolling posts and one of our very helpful regulars
> put forth a thread to amend the newsgroup's
> New Users - FAQ for alt.os.linux.mandrake/mandriva
> document.
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.o...b376278b811700
>
> Left_coast immediately fired off at least 2 abuse reports within about
> 24 hours +/- processing time for all envolved.
>
> As I misunderstand it, 1'st abuse report was a spam report and the
> 2'nd was "Subject line" breach of etiquette.
>
> Thread started about 10:22, left_coast sent an abuse report, abuse dept
> contacted Aragorn, he responded to abuse dept email, and at 11:22 posted
> about left_coast's /backstabbing/ *dastardly* attempt to have him silenced.
>
> At post 38, we see left_coast posting from a Usenet server which does
> not provide his ip address and with an Acceptable Use Policy which
> lets him get away with just about anything.
>
> Proceed at your own risk. 
Thanks for the heads-up. That guy seems to be a real psycho.
(and incredibly boring)
I'll ignore him from now on.