The Security of Free Software

,----[ Headings ]
| 1 SECURE FREEDOM
|
| 1.1 "TRUE FREENESS"
|
| 1.2 "THE COMMUNITY EFFECT"
|
| 2 SECURE TECHNOLOGY
|
| 2.1 "GIVEN ENOUGH EYEBALLS ALL BUGS ARE SHALLOW"
|
| 2.2 "TESTED BY THE BEST"
`----

http://www.libervis.com/article/the_..._free_software

[Security:] Mozilla Thunderbird vs. Microsoft Outlook

,----[ Quote ]
| For me, I’m going to stick with anything but Outlook for email for the
| reasons I’ve cited above.
`----

http://www.esecurityplanet.com/article.php/3702831

Outlook -- the botmaster-friendly mail client.


Related:

How secure are Linux, Window and Mac OS?

http://www.masuran.org/node/29

Why Windows is less secure than Linux

http://blogs.zdnet.com/threatchaos/?p=311


Linux more secure than Windows, national survey shows

http://www.xomba.com/linux_more_secu...l_survey_shows


Microsoft Windows: Insecure by Design

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp...nguage=printer


If Only We Knew Then What We Know Now About Windows XP

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...rss_technology


Why Windows is a security nightmare.

http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/...120110704.html


The Structural Failures of Windows

http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=15305


Linux Security: A Big Edge Over Windows

http://www.linuxinsider.com/rsstory/54742.html