phil-news-nospam@ipal.net wrote:
> Anyone know of a kernel patch for more virtual consoles of the text variety?
No. But how many virtual consoles do you need? Is the current limit of
64 virtual consoles too small?
--
Lew
This is a discussion on a patch for more virtual consoles? - Linux ; Anyone know of a kernel patch for more virtual consoles of the text variety? -- |---------------------------------------/----------------------------------| | Phil Howard KA9WGN (ka9wgn.ham.org) / Do not send to the address below | | first name lower case at ipal.net / spamtrap-2006-10-23-1106@ipal.net | ...
Anyone know of a kernel patch for more virtual consoles of the text variety?
--
|---------------------------------------/----------------------------------|
| Phil Howard KA9WGN (ka9wgn.ham.org) / Do not send to the address below |
| first name lower case at ipal.net / spamtrap-2006-10-23-1106@ipal.net |
|------------------------------------/-------------------------------------|
phil-news-nospam@ipal.net wrote:
> Anyone know of a kernel patch for more virtual consoles of the text variety?
No. But how many virtual consoles do you need? Is the current limit of
64 virtual consoles too small?
--
Lew
On 23 Oct 2006 11:43:36 -0700 Lew Pitcherwrote:
| phil-news-nospam@ipal.net wrote:
|> Anyone know of a kernel patch for more virtual consoles of the text variety?
|
| No. But how many virtual consoles do you need? Is the current limit of
| 64 virtual consoles too small?
Yup. I'm already using them all. I would have liked to see a whole major
dedicated to this. Many device classes have a whole major number where
one might never use more than 2 or 3 of them.
Right now I have to use screen. And it's more awkward. Of course it
would help if screen had a way to pre-start some sessions. But I'd
still rather have the console devices. I'll figure out keymaps to get
them to work.
--
|---------------------------------------/----------------------------------|
| Phil Howard KA9WGN (ka9wgn.ham.org) / Do not send to the address below |
| first name lower case at ipal.net / spamtrap-2006-10-24-1022@ipal.net |
|------------------------------------/-------------------------------------|
On 2006-10-24, phil-news-nospam@ipal.netwrote:
> On 23 Oct 2006 11:43:36 -0700 Lew Pitcherwrote:
>
>| phil-news-nospam@ipal.net wrote:
>|> Anyone know of a kernel patch for more virtual consoles of the text variety?
>|
>| No. But how many virtual consoles do you need? Is the current limit of
>| 64 virtual consoles too small?
>
> Yup. I'm already using them all. I would have liked to see a whole major
> dedicated to this. Many device classes have a whole major number where
> one might never use more than 2 or 3 of them.
It's just idle curiosity -- how do you use up 64 virtual
consoles?
--
Grant Edwards grante Yow! I think I'll do BOTH
at if I can get RESIDUALS!!
visi.com
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006 17:33:00 -0000 Grant Edwardswrote:
| On 2006-10-24, phil-news-nospam@ipal.netwrote:
|> On 23 Oct 2006 11:43:36 -0700 Lew Pitcherwrote:
|>
|>| phil-news-nospam@ipal.net wrote:
|>|> Anyone know of a kernel patch for more virtual consoles of the text variety?
|>|
|>| No. But how many virtual consoles do you need? Is the current limit of
|>| 64 virtual consoles too small?
|>
|> Yup. I'm already using them all. I would have liked to see a whole major
|> dedicated to this. Many device classes have a whole major number where
|> one might never use more than 2 or 3 of them.
|
| It's just idle curiosity -- how do you use up 64 virtual
| consoles?
Lots of stuff going on. 3 of them are used for 3 instances of X. The
rest are logged in on various aspects of things I'm doing.
I don't really need 256 of them. But a few more than I have now would
be nice. Then I could eliminate using screen.
--
|---------------------------------------/----------------------------------|
| Phil Howard KA9WGN (ka9wgn.ham.org) / Do not send to the address below |
| first name lower case at ipal.net / spamtrap-2006-10-24-1448@ipal.net |
|------------------------------------/-------------------------------------|