Re: Spanking "Owl" and laying other myths to rest : "VirtualDesktops" on Windows.
"Peter Köhlmann" <email@example.com> stated in post
firstname.lastname@example.org on 11/11/08 5:10 AM:
>>>> First: You can't drop using something you never used in the first
>> Nonsense and you know it.[/color]
> Nope. *Nothin* you posted so far indicates that you have *ever* used linux,
> apart from the test-install in a VM on your beloved Win-XP[/color]
Your opinion of what people have and have not done is beyond useless. As I
have repeatedly pointed out, with specific examples, your claims of
knowledge are clearly inaccurate. Here are some examples:
* Confusing a users IP with the IP of a web server or email provider
* Thinking Dreamweaver is *security* software.
* Being unable to figure out who you are writing to on a recurring
basis that is so common it is predictable
* How to get your Usenet client to not cross-post
* Misunderstanding people so bad you think they denied Ubuntu had
a print-to-PDF option
* Unable to figure out if interface consistency is important
* Unable to figure out, even when shown examples, how OpenOffice
mangled a file's spacing.
* Unable to figure out that a fully verifiable PDF is *not* "forged".
And that does not include your amazing ignorance about assembly language
after you claimed to have used it.
"For example, user interfaces are _usually_ better in commercial software.
I'm not saying that this is always true, but in many cases the user
interface to a program is the most important part for a commercial
company..." Linus Torvalds <http://www.tlug.jp/docs/linus.html>