The Retard Joseph Michael - Linux

This is a discussion on The Retard Joseph Michael - Linux ; From: J...@stellar.demon.co.uk (Joseph Michael) Subject: Indonesian Tea Date: 1999/03/14 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 454811792 X-Mail2News-Path: news.demon.net!stellar.demon.co.uk X-Trace: mail2news.demon.co.uk 921407871 mail2news:19664 mail2news mail2news.demon.co.uk Organization: Stellar Drive Reply-To: j...@stellar.demon.co.uk Newsgroups: uk.misc X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net Indonesian tea is apparently a very safe natural male contraceptive! ...

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: The Retard Joseph Michael

  1. The Retard Joseph Michael


    From: J...@stellar.demon.co.uk (Joseph Michael)
    Subject: Indonesian Tea
    Date: 1999/03/14
    Message-ID: <921407377snz@stellar.demon.co.uk>#1/1
    X-Deja-AN: 454811792
    X-Mail2News-Path: news.demon.net!stellar.demon.co.uk
    X-Trace: mail2news.demon.co.uk 921407871 mail2news:19664 mail2news mail2news.demon.co.uk
    Organization: Stellar Drive
    Reply-To: j...@stellar.demon.co.uk
    Newsgroups: uk.misc
    X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net

    Indonesian tea is apparently a very safe natural male contraceptive!
    (Story in BBC news servers)

    Right thats it! All tea is out.
    Actually I am a superstud and its awefully stressfull on the old thingy
    when u need a good night sleep.
    I reckon if I take Viagra, I'll come down a few levels to the same
    levels as reported by users perked up Viagra tablet users...
    what do you reckon?


    Monica Meets Dracula
    --------------------
    Dracula:
    Oh no its a Monica Lewinsky impeachment monster!!!
    I'll get impeached!
    Suck the living daylights out me she will!
    I'm out of here!


    Monica: Grra.ww.w. GRr...ww.w.w. Grraaaww..
    Awe No! Two pricks and he's gone!
    I was so looking forward to feeding time!
    I need food! I need protein!
    Don't leave me like this! Awe! Booo hooo hooo!
    Leave me some lettuce - I'll survive..! :-(


    *-------------------| http://www.stellar.demon.co.uk |-------------------*




    Il mittente di questo messaggio|The sender address of this
    non corrisponde ad un utente |message is not related to a real
    reale ma all'indirizzo fittizio|person but to a fake address of an
    di un sistema anonimizzatore |anonymous system
    Per maggiori informazioni |For more info
    https://www.mixmaster.it


  2. Re: The Retard Joseph Michael

    George Orwell wrote:

    >
    > F


    You know so much that you didn't notice management of his web site
    has moved to http://www.autopenhosting.org/robots/

    And as to his whereabouts - the last I heard it was Italy,
    but then again it could be a cover.
    I think aliens abducted him for sure!!!!

    http://artofhacking.com/IET/NEWTECH/...h_steldriv.htm


    'Newsgroups: alt.sci.physics.new-theories
    From: Joe@stellar.demon.co.uk (Joseph Michael)
    Subject: The Stellar Drive Engine
    Reply-To: Joe@stellar.demon.co.uk
    Date: Sun Sep 19 12:24:55 1993

    STELLAR DRIVE THEORY

    by J. Michael

    (C) Copyright J. Michael 1993


    (Revised 18-09-93 to correct error in penultimate sentence of
    paragraph 3 below.)


    The Stellar Drive Engine is an electromagnetic device for generating
    unidirectional thrust. It has no moving parts and generates
    unidirectional thrust based on a flaw in Maxwell's electromagnetic
    equations which manifests itself when two conductors carrying
    current with harmonics greater than the fundamental interact through
    their magnetic fields. The vector sum for these interacting magnetic
    fields is zero when the excitation is sinusoidal (which is in general
    agreement with default observations based on standard calculations)
    but they are not zero for sustained non-sinusoidal excitations.

    A simple way to explain how a Stellar Drive works is to take two
    electromagnets made from copper wire with an air core and glue
    them back to back with an intervening plastic rod between them.
    The importance of not using an iron core (normally used to enhance
    the electromagnet's strength) is that with an air core, the
    electromagnets are not magnetic when switched off. Using copper
    for the wire and plastic for the intervening rod makes the whole
    assembly non-magnetic. If the electromagnets have magnetic cores,
    or if there are any significant magnetic materials nearby, the device
    will not work at the expected efficiencies. Figure 1. shows the
    arrangement of the non-magnetic electromagnets and the plastic rod.

    When electromagnet one switches on, its field will propagate to
    electromagnet two. Before the field reaches electromagnet two,
    electromagnet one is switched off. Thus we get a travelling pulse of
    magnetic pulse that would eventually sweep past electromagnet two
    at the speed of light. As the pulse from electromagnet one arrives at
    electromagnet two, electromagnet two is switched on.
    Electromagnet two's field interacts with the passing field from
    electromagnet one and electromagnet two would be attracted to
    electromagnet one. (The arguments remain consistent whether the
    force is attraction or repulsion.)


    Electromagnet 1 Electromagnet 2

    :---: :---:
    : :------------------: :
    : : : : Figure 1
    : : : :
    : :------------------: :
    :___: plastic rod :___:



    While the field from electromagnet one is interacting with
    electromagnet two, the rod feels a unidirectional push towards
    electromagnet one. In free space, the rod and electromagnet assembly
    would be accelerated unidirectionally.

    The situation is true while the field from electromagnet one is
    passing over electromagnet two. To create the equal and opposite
    force, the magnetic field from electromagnet two races to
    electromagnet one to interact with it to create the equal and
    opposite. But here it encounters a problem. Electromagnet one is
    switched off and since there is nothing magnetic there it cannot
    interact with it and so it must pass through it unaffected.

    The consequence of this escaping field is that we have created local
    momentum. Once all the fields have escaped the device, there is no
    way of cancelling the locally generated momentum.

    After the field from electromagnet two has passed through
    electromagnet one, the momentum generating cycle can be repeated.
    Electromagnet one is pulsed on and off again and as the field passes
    through electromagnet two, it is also pulsed on and off again
    generating more momentum. In theory, the device can keep on
    accelerating forever if there was a method for energizing the coils on
    and off in the incredibly short periods needed for the interactions to
    be observable.

    Because magnetic fields travel at the speed of light c, the energizing
    method must be very quick so as to generate the appropriate pulsed
    magnetic fields.

    The device has no moving parts, yet it generates thrust. If it were to
    be rotated clockwise ninety degrees and placed on a weighting
    machine (that has no magnetic components nearby) we would see the
    weight of the device lessening . The weight loss would be
    proportional to the amount of power fed to the electromagnets.
    Changing the phase at which the electromagnets are turned on and
    off and the frequency with which they are turned on and off will also
    register proportional thrust. The mark space ratio of the rectangular
    wave used to turn the electromagnets would also affect the thrust
    generation characteristics of the drive.

    The Stellar Drive would appear to be violating Newton's third law
    but if we look closely it does not violate Newton's laws. The
    escaping fields have pulling power. The fields escaping to the left
    have more pulling power than to the right because the fields escaping
    to the right have interacted with electromagnet two and thereby
    diminished its strength whereas the field escaping to the left is much
    stronger because it has not interacted with anything. These fields
    will terminate on distant objects and pull them cancelling the locally
    generated momentum.

    This part of the theory more than anything else allows the Stellar
    Drive to exist because from a theoretical point of view, Newton's
    third law is violated locally only to be cancelled globally which is
    perfectly acceptable science. If the device did break Newton's third
    law in its entirety, then virtually all of physics would need to re-
    written and most scientists would find it difficult to accept such a
    theory because of the counter evidence gathered from centuries
    of work.

    The excitation of the electromagnets are assumed to be from a
    rectangular wave. Since the rectangular wave is merely the sum of
    sinusoidal functions given by a Fourier series, it is easy to see that
    in theory at least, the local momentum generating effects should start
    to appear if more than the fundamental harmonic is present in the
    excitation. Energizing the electromagnets with sinusoidal wave forms
    merely allows the radiating of energy in the form of photons which
    is what Maxwell's theory. Photons unfortunately yield virtually zero
    thrust. But turning the excitation to a rectangular wave yields
    extremely large thrust. The theoretical maximum is 50% of the force
    experienced between two electromagnets when they are fully
    switched on, turned into unidirectional thrust. The maths (not
    included) conveniently express unidirectional force generated as a
    percentage of the force measured between two electromagnets when
    they are fully on. This percentage changes as the frequency or shape
    of the excitation wave is changed, if the mark space ratio is altered
    and if the total power delivered to the electromagnets is changed due
    to unwanted physical phenomena (such as inductance). The designs
    for practical devices give 25% maximum but its likely to be much
    less than that when put into operation.

    The effects are large and should be measurable.

    If anyone wants to build a 'Star Wars' (as in the movie) type
    thrusters, building the Stellar Drive is the real way to proceed.
    Fabrication of high speed electromagnets is difficult but I have
    worked out a scheme for implementing it using GaAs photocell ring
    arrays fabricated onto the surface of a chip and illuminated by high
    speed laser pulses (in the picosecond region) to energise it. Because
    high speed lasers have low mark space ratios, the operation of the
    Stellar Drive Array could be severely affected. However, based on a
    consideration of total power consumed, a 100W laser shining over a
    large area array (around one square metre) should be able to generate
    around 1W of mechanical power in the form of unidirectional thrust
    with prototypes even if the mark space ratios are low.

    Improvements in the efficiency of the device can be worked out once
    the physics of picosecond magnetics is better understood.

    This device requires very little capital expenditure to build working
    prototypes compared to work done with ion drives, large thrusters.
    All we need is a GaAs chip to be manufactured and a picosecond
    laser facility to test it. The Stellar Drive is not an 'anti-gravity'
    machine but a proper unidirectional thrust generating engine. As
    such the device could for example control the flight of a missile
    without any control surfaces because of the way it creates forces
    within an object, eliminating the need for complex mechanical
    attitude and spin control systems. Because the Stellar Drive Engine
    can be turned on and off extremely quickly, it can be used to control
    the flight path of high speed projectiles where mechanical systems
    cannot intervene on time. It can also be used to stabilise high speed
    wings in supersonic flight against vibrations through its use to
    deliver a dampening force on the wing tip where no mechanical
    systems can compete because mechanical systems do not have the
    slew rate needed to achieve the desired result.

    It does not take much imagination to put Stellar Drives to military use
    in space. Small solar powered Stellar Drive engine based 'pebbles' (an
    object about a metre in size!) can be put into large high velocity
    holding orbits that can then be switched to target missiles in an all
    out ICBM offensive scenario. These pebbles would be deployed at
    the first hint of tension and would remain in orbit for months if
    necessary. It is much more cheaper than launching large rail guns
    which can be evaded by targets that change velocity. It is better than
    chemical propellant based pebbles because they need to be serviced
    frequently with fuel if they are deployed. Stellar Drive Engines have
    higher slew rate allowing the pebble to change directions much
    faster than mechanical systems will ever be able to do. The pebbles
    are powered by solar panels while in holding orbits but switch to
    chemical batteries when in interceptor mode. Enough pebbles are
    held in storage orbits that can be switched to graded interceptor
    orbits with intercept times in the order of minutes to tens of minutes.

    Satellites equipped with Stellar Drives and a power source such as a
    solar panel or nuclear battery can change their orbits frequently
    because they do not run out of fuel. It is possible to think of
    building dual use satellites that function in low earth orbits and at
    geostationary orbits.

    Because satellites need constant fuel to keep them in low altitude
    and non equatorial geostationary orbits (to repel the excess force of
    gravity), it is possible now to think of deploying Stellar Drive driven
    satellites that generate the counter balancing force to repel an excess
    gravity vector. These satellites are far more useful in that they have
    much narrower footprints and deliver a lot more power to the
    receiving aerials. They are also much easier to control because they
    don't need complex thruster orientation/firing sequences and
    associated complex orbital trajectories to achieve desired
    positioning in space.

    Stellar Drive engined planetary probes powered by nuclear batteries
    or solar cells can be sent off to reach their destinations more quickly
    because the drives can accelerate the probe half of the way and
    decelerate the other half of the journey. The intervening velocities
    reached can be quite high shortening the length of the whole
    journey.

    As for building systems that would take off and land from Earth (as
    in the movie 'Star Wars'), I believe there is a long way to go for
    increasing power to weight ratios before we see such vehicles.
    Regrettably, the device cannot provide warp drive. You may however
    accelerate for a year at a time at g and achieve simulated warp drive.
    Each additional year will add another warp factor. Unfortunately
    your sense of time will be slowed down that will allow you to get to
    your destination apparently at speeds greater than c but what really
    happens is that you will travel at speeds close to c while the rest of
    the Universe ages faster around you. Einstein worked this out in his
    theory of relativity and I have no idea at present on how to
    circumvent Einstein's time dilation effects.

    On a less technical note, some of you must be wondering why go to
    all this bother building all these things. In a round about way I have
    a motive. I personally believe that planets and planetsimals out
    number stars by anything from 2:1 to 5:1 in most stable galaxies and
    because of that I believe that life should have existed in millions of
    planets. The fact that life does not appear to be common and that we
    cannot see any beacons left by other intelligent life forms suggests
    to me far more sinister things are happening than meets the eye. The
    universe is too silent. When you see life and its struggles to exploit
    every niche for survival on just Earth alone, trying to comprehend
    the total silence of the cosmos is an insult to any intelligence. At the
    moment, I believe with our advanced SQUID devices and the like, it
    is far better to listen (e.g. the SETI programme) rather than talk (as
    we do by broadcasting radio waves in all directions in virtually all
    channels). The last thing we need is a hostile visitor that cannot
    tolerate any other forms of life. That a hostile culture dominates this
    part of the universe may be a pretty good one of two reasons why
    there is so little life to be found (the other reason being the sheer
    pessimistic statistics associated with probabilities of stable life
    systems evolving which may in the end turn out to be true). If we are
    faced with hostile culture situation we need to be ready.

    The physics of this device although fitting neatly into standard physics
    without violating Newton's laws, still leaves room for awful rewrites.
    For example, if the device works, it is not necessary for objects to
    reach escape velocity to leave the gravitational pull of another
    object. This line of argument is treading on dangerous territory since
    black holes are assumed to exist on the assumption that escape
    velocity is greater than c and so light must become trapped. There
    are many such niggling doubts that surface once the principles of the
    theory are accepted. For example, what happens at the microscopic
    quantum levels if interactions arise that lead to local momentum
    generation or if escaping fields carry momentum instead of
    'particles'.

    Incidentally, Feynman's ideas about magnetism as an extension of
    electrostatics are better suited to describing the Stellar Drive than
    standard classical models of magnetism. Since Feynman's model is
    totally equivalent to the classical model, we should not see any
    difference and that is just what we get when applied to the Stellar
    Drive.

    All in all, in this project there is a lot of work here for
    students, academics, reporters, research establishments, defence
    companies and Government agencies who get involved.




    AUTHOR'S NOTES

    Please download and distribute this document freely in bulletin
    boards, Internet etc., but don't alter copyrighted content without
    prior permission other than to give credit to say who you are and
    where you downloaded from.



    Anyone interested in involvement, donations or setting up research
    programmes can contact me through any of the following electronic
    methods:-

    Compuserve 100273,350
    Internet Joe@stellar.demon.co.uk
    Fax +44 81 800 9915

    Or through the old fashioned boring postal method:-

    Joe Michael
    23 Portland Rise
    London N4 2PT
    United Kingdom.


    Requests for posting of information bundles and updates will be
    catered at $8 which include a minimal administration charge &
    international post.

    I will reply to as many letters as I can. I am interested in any
    strictly academic comments and cater for letters with professional and
    reasonable maths content. I am weary of claims made by people who
    have 'invented' gyroscopic anti-gravity machines and I am keen to
    disprove any such mechanism to promote the Stellar Drive Engine in
    its place. Students and companies wishing to be educated more on
    the subject matter can arrange for posting of information bundles
    and updates. Alternatively, if there is a group of you out there that
    need a lecture, then that can be arranged too (I travel widely).


    Written by J. Michael

    (C) Copyright J. Michael 1993

    --
    Joseph Michael'


  3. Re: The Retard Joseph Michael

    "7" schreef in bericht
    news:J_oNk.78439$E41.1892@text.news.virginmedia.co m...
    > George Orwell wrote:
    >
    >>
    >> F

    >
    > You know so much that you didn't notice management of his web site
    > has moved to http://www.autopenhosting.org/robots/
    >
    > And as to his whereabouts - the last I heard it was Italy,
    > but then again it could be a cover.
    > I think aliens abducted him for sure!!!!
    >
    > http://artofhacking.com/IET/NEWTECH/...h_steldriv.htm


    "And as to *his* whereabouts" / " *his* web site", >> is this some "clever"
    move to deny that *your* Joseph Michael?
    lol ! Now run along Josh, nobody believes you!

    >
    >
    > 'Newsgroups: alt.sci.physics.new-theories
    > From: Joe@stellar.demon.co.uk (Joseph Michael)
    > Subject: The Stellar Drive Engine
    > Reply-To: Joe@stellar.demon.co.uk
    > Date: Sun Sep 19 12:24:55 1993
    >
    > STELLAR DRIVE THEORY
    >
    > by J. Michael
    >
    > (C) Copyright J. Michael 1993
    >
    >
    > (Revised 18-09-93 to correct error in penultimate sentence of
    > paragraph 3 below.)
    >
    >
    > The Stellar Drive Engine is an electromagnetic device for generating
    > unidirectional thrust. It has no moving parts and generates
    > unidirectional thrust based on a flaw in Maxwell's electromagnetic
    > equations which manifests itself when two conductors carrying
    > current with harmonics greater than the fundamental interact through
    > their magnetic fields. The vector sum for these interacting magnetic
    > fields is zero when the excitation is sinusoidal (which is in general
    > agreement with default observations based on standard calculations)
    > but they are not zero for sustained non-sinusoidal excitations.
    >
    > A simple way to explain how a Stellar Drive works is to take two
    > electromagnets made from copper wire with an air core and glue
    > them back to back with an intervening plastic rod between them.
    > The importance of not using an iron core (normally used to enhance
    > the electromagnet's strength) is that with an air core, the
    > electromagnets are not magnetic when switched off. Using copper
    > for the wire and plastic for the intervening rod makes the whole
    > assembly non-magnetic. If the electromagnets have magnetic cores,
    > or if there are any significant magnetic materials nearby, the device
    > will not work at the expected efficiencies. Figure 1. shows the
    > arrangement of the non-magnetic electromagnets and the plastic rod.
    >
    > When electromagnet one switches on, its field will propagate to
    > electromagnet two. Before the field reaches electromagnet two,
    > electromagnet one is switched off. Thus we get a travelling pulse of
    > magnetic pulse that would eventually sweep past electromagnet two
    > at the speed of light. As the pulse from electromagnet one arrives at
    > electromagnet two, electromagnet two is switched on.
    > Electromagnet two's field interacts with the passing field from
    > electromagnet one and electromagnet two would be attracted to
    > electromagnet one. (The arguments remain consistent whether the
    > force is attraction or repulsion.)
    >
    >
    > Electromagnet 1 Electromagnet 2
    >
    > :---: :---:
    > : :------------------: :
    > : : : : Figure 1
    > : : : :
    > : :------------------: :
    > :___: plastic rod :___:
    >
    >
    >
    > While the field from electromagnet one is interacting with
    > electromagnet two, the rod feels a unidirectional push towards
    > electromagnet one. In free space, the rod and electromagnet assembly
    > would be accelerated unidirectionally.
    >
    > The situation is true while the field from electromagnet one is
    > passing over electromagnet two. To create the equal and opposite
    > force, the magnetic field from electromagnet two races to
    > electromagnet one to interact with it to create the equal and
    > opposite. But here it encounters a problem. Electromagnet one is
    > switched off and since there is nothing magnetic there it cannot
    > interact with it and so it must pass through it unaffected.
    >
    > The consequence of this escaping field is that we have created local
    > momentum. Once all the fields have escaped the device, there is no
    > way of cancelling the locally generated momentum.
    >
    > After the field from electromagnet two has passed through
    > electromagnet one, the momentum generating cycle can be repeated.
    > Electromagnet one is pulsed on and off again and as the field passes
    > through electromagnet two, it is also pulsed on and off again
    > generating more momentum. In theory, the device can keep on
    > accelerating forever if there was a method for energizing the coils on
    > and off in the incredibly short periods needed for the interactions to
    > be observable.
    >
    > Because magnetic fields travel at the speed of light c, the energizing
    > method must be very quick so as to generate the appropriate pulsed
    > magnetic fields.
    >
    > The device has no moving parts, yet it generates thrust. If it were to
    > be rotated clockwise ninety degrees and placed on a weighting
    > machine (that has no magnetic components nearby) we would see the
    > weight of the device lessening . The weight loss would be
    > proportional to the amount of power fed to the electromagnets.
    > Changing the phase at which the electromagnets are turned on and
    > off and the frequency with which they are turned on and off will also
    > register proportional thrust. The mark space ratio of the rectangular
    > wave used to turn the electromagnets would also affect the thrust
    > generation characteristics of the drive.
    >
    > The Stellar Drive would appear to be violating Newton's third law
    > but if we look closely it does not violate Newton's laws. The
    > escaping fields have pulling power. The fields escaping to the left
    > have more pulling power than to the right because the fields escaping
    > to the right have interacted with electromagnet two and thereby
    > diminished its strength whereas the field escaping to the left is much
    > stronger because it has not interacted with anything. These fields
    > will terminate on distant objects and pull them cancelling the locally
    > generated momentum.
    >
    > This part of the theory more than anything else allows the Stellar
    > Drive to exist because from a theoretical point of view, Newton's
    > third law is violated locally only to be cancelled globally which is
    > perfectly acceptable science. If the device did break Newton's third
    > law in its entirety, then virtually all of physics would need to re-
    > written and most scientists would find it difficult to accept such a
    > theory because of the counter evidence gathered from centuries
    > of work.
    >
    > The excitation of the electromagnets are assumed to be from a
    > rectangular wave. Since the rectangular wave is merely the sum of
    > sinusoidal functions given by a Fourier series, it is easy to see that
    > in theory at least, the local momentum generating effects should start
    > to appear if more than the fundamental harmonic is present in the
    > excitation. Energizing the electromagnets with sinusoidal wave forms
    > merely allows the radiating of energy in the form of photons which
    > is what Maxwell's theory. Photons unfortunately yield virtually zero
    > thrust. But turning the excitation to a rectangular wave yields
    > extremely large thrust. The theoretical maximum is 50% of the force
    > experienced between two electromagnets when they are fully
    > switched on, turned into unidirectional thrust. The maths (not
    > included) conveniently express unidirectional force generated as a
    > percentage of the force measured between two electromagnets when
    > they are fully on. This percentage changes as the frequency or shape
    > of the excitation wave is changed, if the mark space ratio is altered
    > and if the total power delivered to the electromagnets is changed due
    > to unwanted physical phenomena (such as inductance). The designs
    > for practical devices give 25% maximum but its likely to be much
    > less than that when put into operation.
    >
    > The effects are large and should be measurable.
    >
    > If anyone wants to build a 'Star Wars' (as in the movie) type
    > thrusters, building the Stellar Drive is the real way to proceed.
    > Fabrication of high speed electromagnets is difficult but I have
    > worked out a scheme for implementing it using GaAs photocell ring
    > arrays fabricated onto the surface of a chip and illuminated by high
    > speed laser pulses (in the picosecond region) to energise it. Because
    > high speed lasers have low mark space ratios, the operation of the
    > Stellar Drive Array could be severely affected. However, based on a
    > consideration of total power consumed, a 100W laser shining over a
    > large area array (around one square metre) should be able to generate
    > around 1W of mechanical power in the form of unidirectional thrust
    > with prototypes even if the mark space ratios are low.
    >
    > Improvements in the efficiency of the device can be worked out once
    > the physics of picosecond magnetics is better understood.
    >
    > This device requires very little capital expenditure to build working
    > prototypes compared to work done with ion drives, large thrusters.
    > All we need is a GaAs chip to be manufactured and a picosecond
    > laser facility to test it. The Stellar Drive is not an 'anti-gravity'
    > machine but a proper unidirectional thrust generating engine. As
    > such the device could for example control the flight of a missile
    > without any control surfaces because of the way it creates forces
    > within an object, eliminating the need for complex mechanical
    > attitude and spin control systems. Because the Stellar Drive Engine
    > can be turned on and off extremely quickly, it can be used to control
    > the flight path of high speed projectiles where mechanical systems
    > cannot intervene on time. It can also be used to stabilise high speed
    > wings in supersonic flight against vibrations through its use to
    > deliver a dampening force on the wing tip where no mechanical
    > systems can compete because mechanical systems do not have the
    > slew rate needed to achieve the desired result.
    >
    > It does not take much imagination to put Stellar Drives to military use
    > in space. Small solar powered Stellar Drive engine based 'pebbles' (an
    > object about a metre in size!) can be put into large high velocity
    > holding orbits that can then be switched to target missiles in an all
    > out ICBM offensive scenario. These pebbles would be deployed at
    > the first hint of tension and would remain in orbit for months if
    > necessary. It is much more cheaper than launching large rail guns
    > which can be evaded by targets that change velocity. It is better than
    > chemical propellant based pebbles because they need to be serviced
    > frequently with fuel if they are deployed. Stellar Drive Engines have
    > higher slew rate allowing the pebble to change directions much
    > faster than mechanical systems will ever be able to do. The pebbles
    > are powered by solar panels while in holding orbits but switch to
    > chemical batteries when in interceptor mode. Enough pebbles are
    > held in storage orbits that can be switched to graded interceptor
    > orbits with intercept times in the order of minutes to tens of minutes.
    >
    > Satellites equipped with Stellar Drives and a power source such as a
    > solar panel or nuclear battery can change their orbits frequently
    > because they do not run out of fuel. It is possible to think of
    > building dual use satellites that function in low earth orbits and at
    > geostationary orbits.
    >
    > Because satellites need constant fuel to keep them in low altitude
    > and non equatorial geostationary orbits (to repel the excess force of
    > gravity), it is possible now to think of deploying Stellar Drive driven
    > satellites that generate the counter balancing force to repel an excess
    > gravity vector. These satellites are far more useful in that they have
    > much narrower footprints and deliver a lot more power to the
    > receiving aerials. They are also much easier to control because they
    > don't need complex thruster orientation/firing sequences and
    > associated complex orbital trajectories to achieve desired
    > positioning in space.
    >
    > Stellar Drive engined planetary probes powered by nuclear batteries
    > or solar cells can be sent off to reach their destinations more quickly
    > because the drives can accelerate the probe half of the way and
    > decelerate the other half of the journey. The intervening velocities
    > reached can be quite high shortening the length of the whole
    > journey.
    >
    > As for building systems that would take off and land from Earth (as
    > in the movie 'Star Wars'), I believe there is a long way to go for
    > increasing power to weight ratios before we see such vehicles.
    > Regrettably, the device cannot provide warp drive. You may however
    > accelerate for a year at a time at g and achieve simulated warp drive.
    > Each additional year will add another warp factor. Unfortunately
    > your sense of time will be slowed down that will allow you to get to
    > your destination apparently at speeds greater than c but what really
    > happens is that you will travel at speeds close to c while the rest of
    > the Universe ages faster around you. Einstein worked this out in his
    > theory of relativity and I have no idea at present on how to
    > circumvent Einstein's time dilation effects.
    >
    > On a less technical note, some of you must be wondering why go to
    > all this bother building all these things. In a round about way I have
    > a motive. I personally believe that planets and planetsimals out
    > number stars by anything from 2:1 to 5:1 in most stable galaxies and
    > because of that I believe that life should have existed in millions of
    > planets. The fact that life does not appear to be common and that we
    > cannot see any beacons left by other intelligent life forms suggests
    > to me far more sinister things are happening than meets the eye. The
    > universe is too silent. When you see life and its struggles to exploit
    > every niche for survival on just Earth alone, trying to comprehend
    > the total silence of the cosmos is an insult to any intelligence. At the
    > moment, I believe with our advanced SQUID devices and the like, it
    > is far better to listen (e.g. the SETI programme) rather than talk (as
    > we do by broadcasting radio waves in all directions in virtually all
    > channels). The last thing we need is a hostile visitor that cannot
    > tolerate any other forms of life. That a hostile culture dominates this
    > part of the universe may be a pretty good one of two reasons why
    > there is so little life to be found (the other reason being the sheer
    > pessimistic statistics associated with probabilities of stable life
    > systems evolving which may in the end turn out to be true). If we are
    > faced with hostile culture situation we need to be ready.
    >
    > The physics of this device although fitting neatly into standard physics
    > without violating Newton's laws, still leaves room for awful rewrites.
    > For example, if the device works, it is not necessary for objects to
    > reach escape velocity to leave the gravitational pull of another
    > object. This line of argument is treading on dangerous territory since
    > black holes are assumed to exist on the assumption that escape
    > velocity is greater than c and so light must become trapped. There
    > are many such niggling doubts that surface once the principles of the
    > theory are accepted. For example, what happens at the microscopic
    > quantum levels if interactions arise that lead to local momentum
    > generation or if escaping fields carry momentum instead of
    > 'particles'.
    >
    > Incidentally, Feynman's ideas about magnetism as an extension of
    > electrostatics are better suited to describing the Stellar Drive than
    > standard classical models of magnetism. Since Feynman's model is
    > totally equivalent to the classical model, we should not see any
    > difference and that is just what we get when applied to the Stellar
    > Drive.
    >
    > All in all, in this project there is a lot of work here for
    > students, academics, reporters, research establishments, defence
    > companies and Government agencies who get involved.
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > AUTHOR'S NOTES
    >
    > Please download and distribute this document freely in bulletin
    > boards, Internet etc., but don't alter copyrighted content without
    > prior permission other than to give credit to say who you are and
    > where you downloaded from.
    >
    >
    >
    > Anyone interested in involvement, donations or setting up research
    > programmes can contact me through any of the following electronic
    > methods:-
    >
    > Compuserve 100273,350
    > Internet Joe@stellar.demon.co.uk
    > Fax +44 81 800 9915
    >
    > Or through the old fashioned boring postal method:-
    >
    > Joe Michael
    > 23 Portland Rise
    > London N4 2PT
    > United Kingdom.
    >
    >
    > Requests for posting of information bundles and updates will be
    > catered at $8 which include a minimal administration charge &
    > international post.
    >
    > I will reply to as many letters as I can. I am interested in any
    > strictly academic comments and cater for letters with professional and
    > reasonable maths content. I am weary of claims made by people who
    > have 'invented' gyroscopic anti-gravity machines and I am keen to
    > disprove any such mechanism to promote the Stellar Drive Engine in
    > its place. Students and companies wishing to be educated more on
    > the subject matter can arrange for posting of information bundles
    > and updates. Alternatively, if there is a group of you out there that
    > need a lecture, then that can be arranged too (I travel widely).
    >
    >
    > Written by J. Michael
    >
    > (C) Copyright J. Michael 1993
    >
    > --
    > Joseph Michael'
    >


















































































































































































































































































































































  4. Re: The Retard Joseph Michael

    Clogwog wrote:

    > "7" schreef in bericht
    > news:J_oNk.78439$E41.1892@text.news.virginmedia.co m...
    >> George Orwell wrote:
    >>
    >>>
    >>> F

    >>
    >> You know so much that you didn't notice management of his web site
    >> has moved to http://www.autopenhosting.org/robots/
    >>
    >> And as to his whereabouts - the last I heard it was Italy,
    >> but then again it could be a cover.
    >> I think aliens abducted him for sure!!!!
    >>
    >> http://artofhacking.com/IET/NEWTECH/...h_steldriv.htm

    >
    > "And as to *his* whereabouts" / " *his* web site", >> is this some
    > "clever" move to deny that *your* Joseph Michael?
    > lol ! Now run along Josh, nobody believes you!



    Eh? I thought you were the clever one forgetting
    to mention the web site is now at http://www.autopenhosting.org/robots/
    You should be rushing in there as you did to look
    up domain registration details and exposing the
    master of disguise behind that web site.
    Show us all how clever you are fool!



    >> 'Newsgroups: alt.sci.physics.new-theories
    >> From: Joe@stellar.demon.co.uk (Joseph Michael)
    >> Subject: The Stellar Drive Engine
    >> Reply-To: Joe@stellar.demon.co.uk
    >> Date: Sun Sep 19 12:24:55 1993
    >>
    >> STELLAR DRIVE THEORY
    >>
    >> by J. Michael
    >>
    >> (C) Copyright J. Michael 1993
    >>
    >>
    >> (Revised 18-09-93 to correct error in penultimate sentence of
    >> paragraph 3 below.)
    >>
    >>
    >> The Stellar Drive Engine is an electromagnetic device for generating
    >> unidirectional thrust. It has no moving parts and generates
    >> unidirectional thrust based on a flaw in Maxwell's electromagnetic
    >> equations which manifests itself when two conductors carrying
    >> current with harmonics greater than the fundamental interact through
    >> their magnetic fields. The vector sum for these interacting magnetic
    >> fields is zero when the excitation is sinusoidal (which is in general
    >> agreement with default observations based on standard calculations)
    >> but they are not zero for sustained non-sinusoidal excitations.
    >>
    >> A simple way to explain how a Stellar Drive works is to take two
    >> electromagnets made from copper wire with an air core and glue
    >> them back to back with an intervening plastic rod between them.
    >> The importance of not using an iron core (normally used to enhance
    >> the electromagnet's strength) is that with an air core, the
    >> electromagnets are not magnetic when switched off. Using copper
    >> for the wire and plastic for the intervening rod makes the whole
    >> assembly non-magnetic. If the electromagnets have magnetic cores,
    >> or if there are any significant magnetic materials nearby, the device
    >> will not work at the expected efficiencies. Figure 1. shows the
    >> arrangement of the non-magnetic electromagnets and the plastic rod.
    >>
    >> When electromagnet one switches on, its field will propagate to
    >> electromagnet two. Before the field reaches electromagnet two,
    >> electromagnet one is switched off. Thus we get a travelling pulse of
    >> magnetic pulse that would eventually sweep past electromagnet two
    >> at the speed of light. As the pulse from electromagnet one arrives at
    >> electromagnet two, electromagnet two is switched on.
    >> Electromagnet two's field interacts with the passing field from
    >> electromagnet one and electromagnet two would be attracted to
    >> electromagnet one. (The arguments remain consistent whether the
    >> force is attraction or repulsion.)
    >>
    >>
    >> Electromagnet 1 Electromagnet 2
    >>
    >> :---: :---:
    >> : :------------------: :
    >> : : : : Figure 1
    >> : : : :
    >> : :------------------: :
    >> :___: plastic rod :___:
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> While the field from electromagnet one is interacting with
    >> electromagnet two, the rod feels a unidirectional push towards
    >> electromagnet one. In free space, the rod and electromagnet assembly
    >> would be accelerated unidirectionally.
    >>
    >> The situation is true while the field from electromagnet one is
    >> passing over electromagnet two. To create the equal and opposite
    >> force, the magnetic field from electromagnet two races to
    >> electromagnet one to interact with it to create the equal and
    >> opposite. But here it encounters a problem. Electromagnet one is
    >> switched off and since there is nothing magnetic there it cannot
    >> interact with it and so it must pass through it unaffected.
    >>
    >> The consequence of this escaping field is that we have created local
    >> momentum. Once all the fields have escaped the device, there is no
    >> way of cancelling the locally generated momentum.
    >>
    >> After the field from electromagnet two has passed through
    >> electromagnet one, the momentum generating cycle can be repeated.
    >> Electromagnet one is pulsed on and off again and as the field passes
    >> through electromagnet two, it is also pulsed on and off again
    >> generating more momentum. In theory, the device can keep on
    >> accelerating forever if there was a method for energizing the coils on
    >> and off in the incredibly short periods needed for the interactions to
    >> be observable.
    >>
    >> Because magnetic fields travel at the speed of light c, the energizing
    >> method must be very quick so as to generate the appropriate pulsed
    >> magnetic fields.
    >>
    >> The device has no moving parts, yet it generates thrust. If it were to
    >> be rotated clockwise ninety degrees and placed on a weighting
    >> machine (that has no magnetic components nearby) we would see the
    >> weight of the device lessening . The weight loss would be
    >> proportional to the amount of power fed to the electromagnets.
    >> Changing the phase at which the electromagnets are turned on and
    >> off and the frequency with which they are turned on and off will also
    >> register proportional thrust. The mark space ratio of the rectangular
    >> wave used to turn the electromagnets would also affect the thrust
    >> generation characteristics of the drive.
    >>
    >> The Stellar Drive would appear to be violating Newton's third law
    >> but if we look closely it does not violate Newton's laws. The
    >> escaping fields have pulling power. The fields escaping to the left
    >> have more pulling power than to the right because the fields escaping
    >> to the right have interacted with electromagnet two and thereby
    >> diminished its strength whereas the field escaping to the left is much
    >> stronger because it has not interacted with anything. These fields
    >> will terminate on distant objects and pull them cancelling the locally
    >> generated momentum.
    >>
    >> This part of the theory more than anything else allows the Stellar
    >> Drive to exist because from a theoretical point of view, Newton's
    >> third law is violated locally only to be cancelled globally which is
    >> perfectly acceptable science. If the device did break Newton's third
    >> law in its entirety, then virtually all of physics would need to re-
    >> written and most scientists would find it difficult to accept such a
    >> theory because of the counter evidence gathered from centuries
    >> of work.
    >>
    >> The excitation of the electromagnets are assumed to be from a
    >> rectangular wave. Since the rectangular wave is merely the sum of
    >> sinusoidal functions given by a Fourier series, it is easy to see that
    >> in theory at least, the local momentum generating effects should start
    >> to appear if more than the fundamental harmonic is present in the
    >> excitation. Energizing the electromagnets with sinusoidal wave forms
    >> merely allows the radiating of energy in the form of photons which
    >> is what Maxwell's theory. Photons unfortunately yield virtually zero
    >> thrust. But turning the excitation to a rectangular wave yields
    >> extremely large thrust. The theoretical maximum is 50% of the force
    >> experienced between two electromagnets when they are fully
    >> switched on, turned into unidirectional thrust. The maths (not
    >> included) conveniently express unidirectional force generated as a
    >> percentage of the force measured between two electromagnets when
    >> they are fully on. This percentage changes as the frequency or shape
    >> of the excitation wave is changed, if the mark space ratio is altered
    >> and if the total power delivered to the electromagnets is changed due
    >> to unwanted physical phenomena (such as inductance). The designs
    >> for practical devices give 25% maximum but its likely to be much
    >> less than that when put into operation.
    >>
    >> The effects are large and should be measurable.
    >>
    >> If anyone wants to build a 'Star Wars' (as in the movie) type
    >> thrusters, building the Stellar Drive is the real way to proceed.
    >> Fabrication of high speed electromagnets is difficult but I have
    >> worked out a scheme for implementing it using GaAs photocell ring
    >> arrays fabricated onto the surface of a chip and illuminated by high
    >> speed laser pulses (in the picosecond region) to energise it. Because
    >> high speed lasers have low mark space ratios, the operation of the
    >> Stellar Drive Array could be severely affected. However, based on a
    >> consideration of total power consumed, a 100W laser shining over a
    >> large area array (around one square metre) should be able to generate
    >> around 1W of mechanical power in the form of unidirectional thrust
    >> with prototypes even if the mark space ratios are low.
    >>
    >> Improvements in the efficiency of the device can be worked out once
    >> the physics of picosecond magnetics is better understood.
    >>
    >> This device requires very little capital expenditure to build working
    >> prototypes compared to work done with ion drives, large thrusters.
    >> All we need is a GaAs chip to be manufactured and a picosecond
    >> laser facility to test it. The Stellar Drive is not an 'anti-gravity'
    >> machine but a proper unidirectional thrust generating engine. As
    >> such the device could for example control the flight of a missile
    >> without any control surfaces because of the way it creates forces
    >> within an object, eliminating the need for complex mechanical
    >> attitude and spin control systems. Because the Stellar Drive Engine
    >> can be turned on and off extremely quickly, it can be used to control
    >> the flight path of high speed projectiles where mechanical systems
    >> cannot intervene on time. It can also be used to stabilise high speed
    >> wings in supersonic flight against vibrations through its use to
    >> deliver a dampening force on the wing tip where no mechanical
    >> systems can compete because mechanical systems do not have the
    >> slew rate needed to achieve the desired result.
    >>
    >> It does not take much imagination to put Stellar Drives to military use
    >> in space. Small solar powered Stellar Drive engine based 'pebbles' (an
    >> object about a metre in size!) can be put into large high velocity
    >> holding orbits that can then be switched to target missiles in an all
    >> out ICBM offensive scenario. These pebbles would be deployed at
    >> the first hint of tension and would remain in orbit for months if
    >> necessary. It is much more cheaper than launching large rail guns
    >> which can be evaded by targets that change velocity. It is better than
    >> chemical propellant based pebbles because they need to be serviced
    >> frequently with fuel if they are deployed. Stellar Drive Engines have
    >> higher slew rate allowing the pebble to change directions much
    >> faster than mechanical systems will ever be able to do. The pebbles
    >> are powered by solar panels while in holding orbits but switch to
    >> chemical batteries when in interceptor mode. Enough pebbles are
    >> held in storage orbits that can be switched to graded interceptor
    >> orbits with intercept times in the order of minutes to tens of minutes.
    >>
    >> Satellites equipped with Stellar Drives and a power source such as a
    >> solar panel or nuclear battery can change their orbits frequently
    >> because they do not run out of fuel. It is possible to think of
    >> building dual use satellites that function in low earth orbits and at
    >> geostationary orbits.
    >>
    >> Because satellites need constant fuel to keep them in low altitude
    >> and non equatorial geostationary orbits (to repel the excess force of
    >> gravity), it is possible now to think of deploying Stellar Drive driven
    >> satellites that generate the counter balancing force to repel an excess
    >> gravity vector. These satellites are far more useful in that they have
    >> much narrower footprints and deliver a lot more power to the
    >> receiving aerials. They are also much easier to control because they
    >> don't need complex thruster orientation/firing sequences and
    >> associated complex orbital trajectories to achieve desired
    >> positioning in space.
    >>
    >> Stellar Drive engined planetary probes powered by nuclear batteries
    >> or solar cells can be sent off to reach their destinations more quickly
    >> because the drives can accelerate the probe half of the way and
    >> decelerate the other half of the journey. The intervening velocities
    >> reached can be quite high shortening the length of the whole
    >> journey.
    >>
    >> As for building systems that would take off and land from Earth (as
    >> in the movie 'Star Wars'), I believe there is a long way to go for
    >> increasing power to weight ratios before we see such vehicles.
    >> Regrettably, the device cannot provide warp drive. You may however
    >> accelerate for a year at a time at g and achieve simulated warp drive.
    >> Each additional year will add another warp factor. Unfortunately
    >> your sense of time will be slowed down that will allow you to get to
    >> your destination apparently at speeds greater than c but what really
    >> happens is that you will travel at speeds close to c while the rest of
    >> the Universe ages faster around you. Einstein worked this out in his
    >> theory of relativity and I have no idea at present on how to
    >> circumvent Einstein's time dilation effects.
    >>
    >> On a less technical note, some of you must be wondering why go to
    >> all this bother building all these things. In a round about way I have
    >> a motive. I personally believe that planets and planetsimals out
    >> number stars by anything from 2:1 to 5:1 in most stable galaxies and
    >> because of that I believe that life should have existed in millions of
    >> planets. The fact that life does not appear to be common and that we
    >> cannot see any beacons left by other intelligent life forms suggests
    >> to me far more sinister things are happening than meets the eye. The
    >> universe is too silent. When you see life and its struggles to exploit
    >> every niche for survival on just Earth alone, trying to comprehend
    >> the total silence of the cosmos is an insult to any intelligence. At the
    >> moment, I believe with our advanced SQUID devices and the like, it
    >> is far better to listen (e.g. the SETI programme) rather than talk (as
    >> we do by broadcasting radio waves in all directions in virtually all
    >> channels). The last thing we need is a hostile visitor that cannot
    >> tolerate any other forms of life. That a hostile culture dominates this
    >> part of the universe may be a pretty good one of two reasons why
    >> there is so little life to be found (the other reason being the sheer
    >> pessimistic statistics associated with probabilities of stable life
    >> systems evolving which may in the end turn out to be true). If we are
    >> faced with hostile culture situation we need to be ready.
    >>
    >> The physics of this device although fitting neatly into standard physics
    >> without violating Newton's laws, still leaves room for awful rewrites.
    >> For example, if the device works, it is not necessary for objects to
    >> reach escape velocity to leave the gravitational pull of another
    >> object. This line of argument is treading on dangerous territory since
    >> black holes are assumed to exist on the assumption that escape
    >> velocity is greater than c and so light must become trapped. There
    >> are many such niggling doubts that surface once the principles of the
    >> theory are accepted. For example, what happens at the microscopic
    >> quantum levels if interactions arise that lead to local momentum
    >> generation or if escaping fields carry momentum instead of
    >> 'particles'.
    >>
    >> Incidentally, Feynman's ideas about magnetism as an extension of
    >> electrostatics are better suited to describing the Stellar Drive than
    >> standard classical models of magnetism. Since Feynman's model is
    >> totally equivalent to the classical model, we should not see any
    >> difference and that is just what we get when applied to the Stellar
    >> Drive.
    >>
    >> All in all, in this project there is a lot of work here for
    >> students, academics, reporters, research establishments, defence
    >> companies and Government agencies who get involved.
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> AUTHOR'S NOTES
    >>
    >> Please download and distribute this document freely in bulletin
    >> boards, Internet etc., but don't alter copyrighted content without
    >> prior permission other than to give credit to say who you are and
    >> where you downloaded from.
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> Anyone interested in involvement, donations or setting up research
    >> programmes can contact me through any of the following electronic
    >> methods:-
    >>
    >> Compuserve 100273,350
    >> Internet Joe@stellar.demon.co.uk
    >> Fax +44 81 800 9915
    >>
    >> Or through the old fashioned boring postal method:-
    >>
    >> Joe Michael
    >> 23 Portland Rise
    >> London N4 2PT
    >> United Kingdom.
    >>
    >>
    >> Requests for posting of information bundles and updates will be
    >> catered at $8 which include a minimal administration charge &
    >> international post.
    >>
    >> I will reply to as many letters as I can. I am interested in any
    >> strictly academic comments and cater for letters with professional and
    >> reasonable maths content. I am weary of claims made by people who
    >> have 'invented' gyroscopic anti-gravity machines and I am keen to
    >> disprove any such mechanism to promote the Stellar Drive Engine in
    >> its place. Students and companies wishing to be educated more on
    >> the subject matter can arrange for posting of information bundles
    >> and updates. Alternatively, if there is a group of you out there that
    >> need a lecture, then that can be arranged too (I travel widely).
    >>
    >>
    >> Written by J. Michael
    >>
    >> (C) Copyright J. Michael 1993
    >>
    >> --
    >> Joseph Michael'
    >>



  5. Re: The Retard Joseph Michael

    "7" schreef in bericht
    newsIqNk.78498$E41.29494@text.news.virginmedia.com...
    > Clogwog wrote:
    >
    >> "7" schreef in bericht
    >> news:J_oNk.78439$E41.1892@text.news.virginmedia.co m...
    >>> George Orwell wrote:
    >>>
    >>>>
    >>>> F
    >>>
    >>> You know so much that you didn't notice management of his web site
    >>> has moved to http://www.autopenhosting.org/robots/
    >>>
    >>> And as to his whereabouts - the last I heard it was Italy,
    >>> but then again it could be a cover.
    >>> I think aliens abducted him for sure!!!!
    >>>
    >>> http://artofhacking.com/IET/NEWTECH/...h_steldriv.htm

    >>
    >> "And as to *his* whereabouts" / " *his* web site", >> is this some
    >> "clever" move to deny that *your* Joseph Michael?
    >> lol ! Now run along Josh, nobody believes you!

    >
    >
    > Eh? I thought you were the clever one forgetting
    > to mention the web site is now at http://www.autopenhosting.org/robots/
    > You should be rushing in there as you did to look
    > up domain registration details and exposing the
    > master of disguise behind that web site.


    GoDaddy, go!
    http://web.tiscali.it/fractalrobot/joe.gif

    --

    "Robodyne Cybernetics is offering a NEW TECHNOLOGY that is BIGGER than
    anything else before it. It is bigger than Microsoft, its bigger than IBM,
    its bigger than Intel, its bigger than GM, its bigger than Sony and its
    bigger than Mitsubishi."
    http://groups.google.com/group/alt.i...91646c333ddcde

    Signed, 7 AKA J. MICHAEL, king of retards.
    A Lifelong Windows Developer
    Pretend Linux "Advocate"
    Obsessive Freeloader
    Failed Promoter Of Proprietary, Patented Schemes
    All Around Fraud And Hypocrite
    Now, run along, Josh!


  6. Re: The Retard Joseph Michael

    On Tue, 28 Oct 2008 19:38:42 +0100, Clogwog wrote:

    > "7" schreef in bericht
    > newsIqNk.78498$E41.29494@text.news.virginmedia.com...
    >> Clogwog wrote:
    >>
    >>> "7" schreef in bericht
    >>> news:J_oNk.78439$E41.1892@text.news.virginmedia.co m...
    >>>> George Orwell wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> F
    >>>>
    >>>> You know so much that you didn't notice management of his web site
    >>>> has moved to http://www.autopenhosting.org/robots/
    >>>>
    >>>> And as to his whereabouts - the last I heard it was Italy,
    >>>> but then again it could be a cover.
    >>>> I think aliens abducted him for sure!!!!
    >>>>
    >>>> http://artofhacking.com/IET/NEWTECH/...h_steldriv.htm
    >>>
    >>> "And as to *his* whereabouts" / " *his* web site", >> is this some
    >>> "clever" move to deny that *your* Joseph Michael?
    >>> lol ! Now run along Josh, nobody believes you!

    >>
    >>
    >> Eh? I thought you were the clever one forgetting
    >> to mention the web site is now at http://www.autopenhosting.org/robots/
    >> You should be rushing in there as you did to look
    >> up domain registration details and exposing the
    >> master of disguise behind that web site.

    >
    > GoDaddy, go!
    > http://web.tiscali.it/fractalrobot/joe.gif
    >


    Looks like some form of ponzi scheme.

    --
    Moshe Goldfarb
    Collector of soaps from around the globe.
    Please visit The Hall of Linux Idiots:
    http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/
    Please Visit www.linsux.org

+ Reply to Thread