Roy Schestowitz wrote:
> Ms Brimelow did it!
>
> http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/index.php...w-did-it!.html



These wankers make my blood boil:

"In the absence of guidance from the law and its preparatory documents,
and in view of the existence of divergences of opinion regarding how the
computer program exclusion should be applied, it is considered
appropriate at this stage to refer the questions set out in the previous
section to the Enlarged Board of Appeal for its opinion"

There is no ****ing absence. At all. Article 52 of the EPC quite clearly
states that computer programs as such are not patentable. The pro swpat
lobby have been using dishonest and diversionary tactics like this for
years now. Someone needs to stamp on them.