Linux beats Windows in memory usage - Linux

This is a discussion on Linux beats Windows in memory usage - Linux ; On 2008-10-26, DFS was urged to write the following: > "After installing xserver-xgl the memory usage immediately went up to > 17179869180.0 GB for several packages." > > #28 at > http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.p...=freeze&page=3 > > > That's quite a beatdown... Known ...

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Linux beats Windows in memory usage

  1. Re: Linux beats Windows in memory usage

    On 2008-10-26, DFS was urged to write the following:
    > "After installing xserver-xgl the memory usage immediately went up to
    > 17179869180.0 GB for several packages."
    >
    > #28 at
    > http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.p...=freeze&page=3
    >
    >
    > That's quite a beatdown...


    Known bug in the Gnome system monitor thingy...

    --
    It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education.
    ~ Albert Einstein

  2. Linux beats Windows in memory usage

    "After installing xserver-xgl the memory usage immediately went up to
    17179869180.0 GB for several packages."

    #28 at
    http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.p...=freeze&page=3


    That's quite a beatdown...




  3. WINDUMMY FANBOYEES DISGUISED AS ANTI-LINUX SCARECROWS

    Micoshaft asstroturfing fraudster pounding the sock DFS
    wrote on behalf of Half Wits from Micoshaft Department of Marketing:



    > "After installing xserver-xgl the memory usage immediately went up to
    > 17179869180.0 GB for several packages."
    >
    > #28 at
    > http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.p...=freeze&page=3



    Whats with all these windummy fanboyees posting anti-linux scarecrow rants?

    Is this the face of new micoshaft after the defeat of PISTA and success
    of Linux for Ausus EEE?

    With the greatest of respect, the ubuntu forums show only how great the
    support forums are for Linux. Its something micoshaft hasn't got and
    can't compete with because its closed source and no windummy fanboyee
    can offer detailed tech support to the extent offered in Ubuntu help forums.



  4. Re: WINDUMMY FANBOYEES DISGUISED AS ANTI-LINUX SCARECROWS

    On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 20:55:25 GMT, 7 wrote:

    > Micoshaft asstroturfing fraudster pounding the sock DFS
    > wrote on behalf of Half Wits from Micoshaft Department of Marketing:
    >
    >
    >
    >> "After installing xserver-xgl the memory usage immediately went up to
    >> 17179869180.0 GB for several packages."
    >>
    >> #28 at
    >> http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.p...=freeze&page=3

    >
    >
    > Whats with all these windummy fanboyees posting anti-linux scarecrow rants?
    >
    > Is this the face of new micoshaft after the defeat of PISTA and success
    > of Linux for Ausus EEE?
    >
    > With the greatest of respect, the ubuntu forums show only how great the
    > support forums are for Linux. Its something micoshaft hasn't got and
    > can't compete with because its closed source and no windummy fanboyee
    > can offer detailed tech support to the extent offered in Ubuntu help forums.


    It appears Linux lacks a spell checker.

    --
    Moshe Goldfarb
    Collector of soaps from around the globe.
    Please visit The Hall of Linux Idiots:
    http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/
    Please Visit www.linsux.org

  5. Re: WINDUMMY FANBOYEES DISGUISED AS ANTI-LINUX SCARECROWS

    Moshe Goldfarb. wrote:
    >
    > It appears Linux lacks a spell checker.
    >


    What happened to 7? Who pushed this lunatic's button?

  6. Re: WINDUMMY FANBOYEES DISGUISED AS ANTI-LINUX SCARECROWS

    On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 17:56:33 -0400, Linux Pimps wrote:

    > Moshe Goldfarb. wrote:
    >>
    >> It appears Linux lacks a spell checker.
    >>

    >
    > What happened to 7? Who pushed this lunatic's button?


    He spent too much time in the birthing canal and was deprived of oxygen...

    --
    Moshe Goldfarb
    Collector of soaps from around the globe.
    Please visit The Hall of Linux Idiots:
    http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/
    Please Visit www.linsux.org

  7. Re: WINDUMMY FANBOYEES DISGUISED AS ANTI-LINUX SCARECROWS

    After takin' a swig o' grog, 7 belched out
    this bit o' wisdom:

    > Micoshaft asstroturfing fraudster pounding the sock DFS
    > wrote on behalf of Half Wits from Micoshaft Department of Marketing:
    >
    >> "After installing xserver-xgl the memory usage immediately went up to
    >> 17179869180.0 GB for several packages."
    >>
    >> #28 at
    >> http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.p...=freeze&page=3

    >
    > Whats with all these windummy fanboyees posting anti-linux scarecrow rants?


    Picture of DFS:

    http://www.moviecitynews.com/arrays/...scarecrow2.jpg

    > Is this the face of new micoshaft after the defeat of PISTA and success
    > of Linux for Ausus EEE?
    >
    > With the greatest of respect, the ubuntu forums show only how great the
    > support forums are for Linux. Its something micoshaft hasn't got and
    > can't compete with because its closed source and no windummy fanboyee
    > can offer detailed tech support to the extent offered in Ubuntu help forums.


    --
    The perfect lover is one who turns into a pizza at 4:00 A.M.
    -- Charles Pierce

+ Reply to Thread