-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

The extents of Open Source Microsoft Licenses.

,----[ Quote ]
| So where does this leave us? GNOME has been encumbered with Microsoft
| patents. Microsoft clearly has no regard for anyone's intellectual property,
| albeit their own, and will stop at nothing to gain control or draw the life
| from new innovations in order to keep afloat their failing ideal. What can we
| do about it?
|
| Abandon Microsoft entirely, abandon their attempts at 'open source' and give
| complete non-compliance. Through all their underhanded tricks and lies there
| remains one feature inherent to all capitalistic business:
`----

http://stable-entropy.blogspot.com/2...microsoft.html


Yesterday:

Microsoft taints open source CodePlex well

,----[ Quote ]
| Microsoft is posting code to its much-trumpeted CodePlex open-source projects
| site using licenses and conditions that go against the principles of open
| source.
|
| The company has been posting projects under Microsoft licenses that stop you
| from running CodePlex projects on non-Windows platforms or restrict access to
| code.
`----

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/10...plex_licenses/


Related:

[April 1st] Mono to be renamed as Duo

,----[ Quote ]
| Mr de Icaza told those assembled that he had always had a dual purpose in
| starting the project - to provide an implementation of Microsoft's .NET
| development framework so that Linux developers could enjoy the wonderful
| programming tools built in Redmond and also to ensure that in future Linux
| became so integrated with Microsoft that it would not be possible to pull the
| two apart. * *
`----

http://www.itwire.com/content/view/17401/1148/


Miguel, Mono and Microsoft

,----[ Quote ]
| is Mono's role in the deal that of a hook to make customers write
| .NET applications because they can be run on Linux - only to find
| later on that they are armless or legless because of a change in
| the .NETspecifications, a change which Microsoft decides not to
| make public?
|
| [...]
|
| And here we have an individual who decides to replicate one of
| the proprietary company's development environments - for reasons
| best known to him alone - and keeps telling people that the reason
| he's doing it is so that he can pull people over from the
| proprietary company's side to his side!!!
`----

http://www.itwire.com.au/index.php?o...81&Itemid=1091


Mono? Mono!

,----[ Quote ]
| Note the lack of good faith:
|
| *Nobody said that "GNOME depends on Mono"; rather, Mono is pushed into GNOME,
| *distros are installing Tomboy and F-Spot and Beagle by default, and users
| *are intoxicated to believe that they can't live without Mono! *
|
| *"GNOME depends on libbeagle, a Mono program": Sir, we knew that libbeagle is
| *a C library! But why is it there? (Do you need a hint?)
|
| *"NDesk-DBus is replacing DBus in GNOME": I'm afraid this will happen one
| *day!
|
| *"Someday soon it will be practically impossible to write any app for GNOME
| *without being forced to use MONO": Yes, this is going to be true! (Alas...)
`----

http://beranger.org/index.php?page=d.../17-mono-mono-
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkjnTrQACgkQU4xAY3RXLo6M+gCgorkCFVWoZf 7zowuEdolSpGaN
bj4An07c6mJLwD1u8yhm+c49gC6PZyHy
=5Vw9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----